Telstra rivals' slow march to fibre network

commentary A plan by Telstra's major rivals to build their own national fibre to the node (FTTN) broadband network appears to be moving at a glacial pace.

Renai LeMay, ZDNet Australia The group of telcos known as the G9 -- including high-profile companies like Optus, AAPT and Macquarie Telecom -- initially proposed the idea in April last year, in the midst of uncertainty as to whether Telstra's own plans would actually go ahead.

In August Telstra shelved its FTTN proposal until further notice, citing a disagreement with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) over the cost of providing services to the bush.

Since that time, the G9 has released scarcely any detail about their activities. While Telstra's wrangling with the ACCC was the stuff of daily record, in the last 10 months the G9's plans have seldom made the press in any form.

You would imagine the G9 would have taken every opportunity to grab the limelight with its own brain child. But the group appears to be a bit shy.

Of course, work is going on behind the scenes. Macquarie Telecom's national executive for Regulatory and Government Matt Healy told your writer last week that the G9 was continually updating the ACCC and the federal government on its progress.

In addition, South African bank Investec has been recruited to help out with some of the financial nitty-gritty involved in planning a multi-billion dollar network whose return on capital invested has already proven to be a sticky issue.

But why is it taking so long? Surely the G9 have a wealth of expertise in building networks by now ... and they're all motivated by the common goal of taking Telstra down. What details still need to be hammered out before action can be taken?

And what about keeping the rest of the nation in the loop?

In stark contrast, Telstra has used the same period to maximum advantage, polishing off a gruelling 10-month build of its new nationwide Next G mobile broadband network in October. And in February the telco kicked off a massive effort to try and enlist the public in its campaign for revised telecommunications regulations.

A few words of advice for Optus and its compatriots: it wouldn't be hard to enlist that same public in the cause of the G9 proposal.

After all, the Australian public in general has consistently demonstrated a healthy degree of cynicism for Telstra's rhetoric, and has not hesitated to send its money elsewhere in the last 10 years following the deregulation of the telecommunications sector.

While Telstra's proposal ultimately failed, maybe the telco has been able to take decisive action since that time because it doesn't have to reach agreement with other telcos about its plans.

Are too many cooks spoiling G9's broth? Is the group dithering, or is there hard work going on behind the scenes? Drop me a line directly at renai.lemay@zdnet.com.au.

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    Are they really interested? Anonymous -- 28/02/07

    Its the question you have to ask. They claim big, but really the FTTN G9 proposal was only made after Telstra threatened to hold them out of the system. I believe that they will never build the FTTN because they have a sweet deal with the copper lines, and the majority of users can get ADSL2+ or ADSL deals with them, if they cant they dont really treat it as a lost customer.

    Unless the government chucks them a looooooot of money (all of the BC funds) it wont happen, and the government is never quick about getting Telecommunications going in this country, so it will be decades before we see FTTN, and all the people who are stuck behind RIMs actually get a decent broadband deal.

    caution Anonymous -- 01/03/07

    I somewhat beleive that the G9 group are just being cautous. I would not put it past Telstra and the little mexican to all of a sudden go ahead with their FTTN plan once the G9 started their rollout, to try and stuff up the G9, ala the HCF rollout in Sydney.

    G9 BS Artists. Anonymous -- 01/03/07 (in reply to #320075517)

    If our looney tune Government gives one cent of my money to this G9 fiasco I will never vote for them again.

    RE: G9 BS Artists Tom -- 02/03/07 (in reply to #320075564)

    Perhaps you could explain why you think it is such a bad idea? Its all well and good to cry foul about something, but unless you can back it up you cant expect anyone to take you seriously ...

    The purpose of the G9 is to provide an equal access opportunity network to anyone that wishes to buy access to its services, including Telstra.

    This also included access at reasonable pricing, something Telstra couldnt guarantee.

    Obviously you are a Telstra shareholder, either that or you have failed to understand the true value that the G9's proposed network would bring to Australian internet and telecommunications.

    RE: G9 BS Artists Anonymous -- 05/03/07 (in reply to #320075638)

    The intent of the G9 is pretty obvious from their latest proposal.
    They want access to Telstra's copper network from the node to the house and are willing to pay Telstra $5/month for this for those customers they want to service. In exchange, they want legislation requireing Telstra to abandon it's copper network and buy access to their fibre network for each and every one of it's customers for $15/month and to prohibit Telstra from building it's own fibre network.

    Economic realities John Ellis -- 04/03/07

    Honestly, where is the incentive for either Telstra or G9 to build and maintain a nationwide FTTN network? The revenue per subscriber would be minuscule, and would need to be subsidized by premium content based services e.g. IPtv, VoD, pay-TV, home security monitoring, etc. All of these content and feature rich services need guaranteed high bandwidth to the node that both FTTN and HFC networks can provide, and if Telstra et al could ensure that the uptake would be adequate the network build would commence.

    With media ownership laws changing, I suspect that the politics and economics might make sense sooner rather than later, but before investment will flow these things need to be guaranteed (or as best as they can in the world of business). Telstra focusing on building out its 3G 850 network and retiring both GSM and CDMA (reduce duplication and costs) makes sense. This network will not only pay for itself with general usage, but the new handset technology with consumer push email, optimized browser and mobile broadband will provide new revenue opportunities – it’s a guaranteed money spinner, FTTN is not!

    Part of the problem is the Australian consumer, there is simply not enough subscribers pushing the envelope of converged usage as there are in other countries, therefore revenue per subscriber cannot be assured. It is a chicken and the egg, because most people would say “why spend so much to get so little, just make do with what I’ve got”, however what studies have proven is that when revenue and operation model for new technology matures and there are examples that can be referenced, providers will follow and deliver the service to make an assured dollar. This will require continual awareness campaigns, pilot projects etc, to ensure that the market is ready to take on the technology, in Australia the market is not!

    How long will Telstra, G9 and more importantly the government hold out is anyone’s guess, but the government cannot ignore the economic realities of Australia being what it is – not enough subscribers to justify such a significant capital outlay for non-government organizations – today!

    The government should have split Telstra, keeping what amounts to the network and wholesale part of the business and making the retail / ISP / directory business public. Oh well too late, you’ll just have to live with what you have, as I know enjoy my 100MB to my condo here in my Asian tropical home 

    Level playing field Anonymous -- 07/03/07

    The G9 group said the Telstra price for access to the proposed FTTN network was too high, the ACCC aggreed and set a price that Telstra rejected. Everyone agrees that there is no merit or need for two FTTN networks.

    So as long as the G9 rollout still covers all the area Telstra was going to cover and Telstra is only charged the previously set ACCC price everything will be fair and legislation/regulation to ensure there is only one network rolled out will be reasonable.

    Of cource if the G9 group tries to limit the rollout to profitable areas or wants to charge Telstra more it wont reflect very well on their ethics. If the ACCC agreed to a limited rollout or a price increase it would go a long way to substantiate the Telstra claim of bias from this organisation.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured