Telstra restates fiscal guidance following ACCC ruling

In a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) on Monday, Australia's largest telco lowered its earnings forecasts for 2006/7 following the competition watchdog's decision to reduce the amount Telstra can charge third party broadband suppliers for access to some of its exchanges.

Telstra's revenue growth expectations are now 1.5 to two percent, compared to between two and 2.5 percent, which was the figure presented in the company's annual results earlier this month. Earnings before interest and tax are now expected to be between two and four percent, compared to between four and six percent previously.

The new guidance figures were expected after the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) ruled that Telstra could only charge one particular third party AU$17.70 per month for access to certain copper lines running from its suburban exchanges. This compared with the previous minimum access price for all third parties of AU$22 per month.

"Telstra notes that since Friday 11 August 2006, when the ACCC first issued an interim determination at AU$17.70 per month in Band 2, the ACCC has issues several other interim determinations at the same level and Telstra expects the same outcome in the remaining interim determinations," the Telstra statement said.

The pricing guidance set by the ACCC affects access to the copper lines that run directly into customers' premises from one of Telstra's suburban (Band 2) exchanges. For Band 1 (inner metropolitan), the ACCC set a price of AU$7.20 and for Band 3 (rural) a price of AU$34.20.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    The numbers don't add up Anonymous -- 21/08/06 (in reply to #120140504)

    Something smells off.

    Given the fact that Telstra have almost *no* customers on ULLs (most of them are on Telstra Wholesale DSL or SSS (Spectrum Sharing) - how can the price change affect their bottom line that much?

    ULL revenue = 0 customers x $17.70 = 0
    ULL revenue = 0 customers x $22 = 0

    How is the customer connected? Anonymous -- 21/08/06 (in reply to #120140515)

    Ignorance is bliss!! How do you think the DSL service gets to the home if not for the copper between the rival telco's DSLAM in the exchange to the customer's home. The whole premis of ULL (unbundled local loop) is that Telstra provides the copper for the last mile. The customer doesn't pay the ULL price, Optus, AAPT, iPrimus, etc pay the wholesale rate to Telstra.

    With the ACCC's assistance other companies get a leg up to compete with Telstra

    SSS vs ULL Jason Backshall -- 21/08/06 (in reply to #120140523)

    Most if not all of the ISPs out there currently use Spectrum Sharing - that is, where Telstra provide the voice service, and the ISP can utilise the upper part of the available spectrum to provide broadband services through DSL.

    This is quite different to ULL - where Telstra don't even provide a voice service, it's just copper with nothing. Last I checked, I couldn't find any provider using ULL, they're all on SSS (Spectrum Sharing).

    Pay attention thisis nothing to do with monopolies!!! Milton C Fodder -- 22/08/06 (in reply to #120140515)

    It would be good to have people fully understand the signifcance of the ULL. That is the copper from the exchange to the custonmer premises. So if No body uses it how does Optus, Primus etc provide telephone services.
    The issue here is more about rural and city users of the infrastructure. The further out from the GPO the more expensive to lease line.. Hence they will comptete in metro areas and not in rural... With the loop bundled line rental is the same no matter wher you live
    This is the issue. Let the ACC set the price...fine, but why should the LL be unbundled. It disadvantages the bush

    Please pay attention. Keith Styles -- 23/08/06 (in reply to #120140583)

    ULL means Unloaded Local Loop. No one uses it because it requires exchange equipment provided by the ISP or independent Telco. Telstra DOES NOT provide voice services on ULL. The overhead for Telstra maintenance is minimal.

    ALL ISP's including those you mentioned use SSS, which shares the local loop with Telstra. It has nothing to do with ULL. See Jason's comments above.
    Even though the ISP pays Telstra for the SSS service, they in turn pass the cost on to their customers. So we finish up paying more, when we should be paying less!

    Don't confuse the issue. The share holders love you. Maybe you are one? If you are, like all gamblers, your on a loosing streak.

    Many use ULLS Anonymous -- 25/08/06 (in reply to #120140652)

    Nobody uses ULLS? That will be news to Primus, Optus (especially XYZed), TransACT I think, and several others who do use ULLS. Sure, there are probably twice as many SSS/LSS connections out there with iiNet, Agile, TPG, and so forth - but there are plenty of ULLS connections out there today.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured