Telstra loses Hutch 3G network struggle

Telstra's attempt to appoint a person of its choice as the chairman of the "3GIS" mobile network it operates with rival Hutchison Telecom Australia was yesterday rejected by the Victorian Supreme Court.

"I am pleased, but not surprised to see the matter has been resolved in our favour," said HTA chief Nigel Dews.

"Telstra made an untenable claim to assume a greater say in the operations of 3GIS than they are entitled to. I hope that under the new management team, this kind of approach by Telstra is a thing of the past," he added.

The dispute arose following the announcement in February this year that Hutchison Australia intended to merge with Vodafone Australia, which Telstra claimed changed the operations of the 3GIS partnership that it has an equal stake in.

Telstra's case rested on a clause in the companies' initial agreement which stated that in the event of a "Change of Control" of Hutchison, Telstra could appoint its nominees as chairman of the shared network's board and the Technical Committee of 3GIS — the company that Telstra in 2004 had paid $450 million for a 50 per cent stake in.

On 20 March 2009 Telstra moved to appoint Stuart Lee in place of Hutchison's nominee Michael Young, which would have given Lee the right to cast votes at board meetings. However, yesterday the court ruled Telstra's nomination invalid, that it should not be entitled to cast votes at board meetings and that Telstra pay for Hutchisons' court costs.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    Bull in China Shop Alert Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 28/05/09

    Telstra's claim was always going to fail.

    But post-Sol, the large near-monopoly ought start realising that going about its business quietly, competing aggressively without ever claiming to need monopoly rights will get it far further than the 'bull in a china shop' approach used by Sol+Burgess.

    Contrast the Telstra approach to the Qantas one. Qantas price aggressively where necessary, still try to maximise margins on bits where there is little or no competition, and never make public claims about needing to 'own the skies'... and they have little regulatory interference. Telstra on the other hand wants to be known for 'bad play', let's everything get settled in court, and is its own biggest negative-PR machine.

    And poor customer service Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 29/05/09 (in reply to #320139110)

    Aside from Telstra in a media-sense being its own biggest negative-PR machine, at an individual customer level, they are still too much like shopping at a Russian department store during the Soviet era ("No, I'm forbidden from telling you why we won't supply the product you are after")
    But, they do have by-far the best coverage in the bush!

    The bully failed - again! Keith Styles -- 29/05/09

    A great opportunity for the New Telstra chief executive David Thodey to cut costs. Take an axe to the hugely expensive legal department and reallocate the costs of the endless legal battles to customer services & support. It could also save the public purse significant court & tribunal costs associated with the endless challenges leveled by Telstra every time anyone challenges their monopoly tactics.

    Will he? Probably not!

    It would let Telstra management "Compete" rather than try to bully & brow beat their way to success.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured