Telstra keeps ADSL2+ under wraps

Telstra has a "substantial" footprint of next-generation ADSL2+ technology in its telephone exchanges, but remains unwilling to offer the upgraded broadband service to customers, the telco said yesterday.

With Telstra's fibre to the node plans practically cancelled for now, attention has turned to the ADSL2+ technology the company has been deploying since January 2005. ADSL2+ allows speeds of up to 24Mbps and along with uncapped ADSL1 (up to 8Mbps) is being sold by an increasing number of Telstra's rivals. Telstra limits the ADSL broadband it sells to its own wholesale and retail customers to 1.5Mbps.

Greg Winn

"Let me put it this way. We have the capacity. We have DSL2+ in place," Telstra's chief operations officer Greg Winn told journalists in Melbourne yesterday in response to a question from ZDNet Australia.

"We don't have it turned on, for all the obvious reasons, and I'm not going to go there," he continued. "But from a network technology standpoint, if any of our competitors can do it, do you think we can't?"

Back in March 2005, Telstra's then managing director, data and online, Andrew Johnson said nearly all of Telstra's ADSL-enabled exchanges would have ADSL2+ capabilities by mid-2006.

Johnson said the then AU$210 million upgrade had been under way since January 2005. "By mid 2005, 200 exchanges covering about 500,000 premises will have ADSL2+ capability at a cost of AU$60 million," Johnson said.

"We have budgeted a further AU$150 million in financial year 05/06 for the purchase and installation of ADSL2+ technology and coverage will rapidly increase so that by mid-2006 nearly all ADSL-enabled exchanges will have ADSL2+ capability."

At the time Johnson said ADSL2+ technology would also be available to Telstra wholesale customers.

However, since that time Telstra has undergone a complete management reshuffle that has seen the company's direction change dramatically under the leadership of chief executive officer Sol Trujillo.

Winn declined to reveal the exact extent of Telstra's ADSL2+ capability. "But we have a substantial footprint," he said.

The Telstra executive said his company would respond in the marketplace to rivals' offerings.

"We're not afraid of anybody. We will compete in the marketplace. We're going to compete on broadband and we're going to compete on mobiles. We're a formidable competitor, mark my words on that one," he said.

Winn's comments came at the unveiling of the telco's new AU$50 million Integration Laboratory in the Victorian capital.

The facility will test much of the new technology forming the heart of the telco's next-generation network announced last November. For example, the DSL Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) needed to deliver ADSL services were on display.

Vendors Alcatel, Cisco, Juniper, Tellabs and Ericsson have all allocated staff and equipment to the laboratory to assist with the integration process.

Renai LeMay travelled to Melbourne as a guest of Telstra.

Talkback 10 comments

    Telstra ADSL2+? Anonymous -- 25/08/06 (in reply to #120140846)

    "We don't have it turned on, for all the obvious reasons, and I'm not going to go there,"
    Can someone enlighten me or point me to where Telstra has stated the obvious reasons for not switching on ADSL2+?

    Its obvious! Anonymous -- 25/08/06 (in reply to #120140847)

    If they actually turned on ADSL2+ everyone would find out that the FTTN emperor has no clothes - and Telstra wouldn't want that now, would they!

    Obvious reasons? NOT! Keith Styles -- 25/08/06

    If they have it WHY? isn't it turned ON?

    If I were a share holder and knew the blobs who run this company had spent $50m and plan to spend another $150m I'd want to know why the sob's aren't earning more for my investment.

    My guess is, as usual, they are still protecting their old analogue systems. Oh dear, so sad! The ADSL2+ ISP's are making a killing & Telstra "Mad Hatters" still think they control it all.

    The Comms Minister should be asking them WHY! they spent all that money and it's not earning the government any return. They are after all, the major share holder, still.

    Telstra ADSL2+ Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    Haven't turned on ADSL 2+ for obvious reasons? ONLY reason I can think of is that they're trying to get rid of customers like me...had Telstra ADSL, it was adequate. I'm gone, and I'm thrilled with my ADSL2+ (and it's the $5 cheaper than my Telstra ADSL was...)

    Sorry Telstra shareholders, you lose again.

    Frustrated... Darren -- 28/08/06

    Never mind the exchange updates, the politics of FTTN, and another stab at the stock market -- what about the inadequate wiring from the street to my house? This is the real problem. I'm suffering on Bigpond "Broadband" and after some extended research realised I was being ripped off by Telstra. After waiting for my local exchange to be upgraded, I was willing to jump ship to a cheaper ADSL2+ service from a competitor - only to be told that my house (10 years old, newish estate) doesn't have the correct cabling from the street to the house.... Allegedly Telstra skimped with the pair gain system and shared the lines allocated to the street. As Telstra doesn't offer ADSL2+ they are not obligated to upgrade the line.

    DIY Anonymous -- 28/08/06

    Got backhoe?
    Start diggin.. Rip it all up!

    Telstra ADSL2+ Andy Blunden -- 31/08/06

    Typical arrogance. We have the technology but we aren't going to release it. What sort of business is this? It should be out there now. Australia has the worst broadband performance in the western world and they want to keep it under wraps. Any business that spends this much money and then doesn't obtain a return on investment is culpible. Get it out there you idiots before your share price drops another dollar!

    Re ADSL2+ Anonymous -- 01/09/06 (in reply to #120142393)

    >Typical arrogance. We have the technology but we >aren't going to release it. What sort of business is this?

    Welcome to Telstra

    The sad truth Anonymous -- 01/09/06

    Having read the comments to this story, I cannot but empathise with the comments made. The comments regarding the cretins running our national telco are well made. This occurred as the direct result of Federal Government inspired (at the behest of their corporate masters) debraining of the organisation by a process of deliberately promoting idiots over anyone with the capacity for thought and offering the disgruntled remainder very attractive redundancy packages. In some cases this was overdone and some redundees actually had to be enticed back to their old positions (at higher wages and they got to keep their redundancy packages too!) through employment agencies (to save face) because no one, not those left behind, nor the private contractors brought in to take over, could figure out how to do the job. (it is not as easy as the general public often seems to think!) Any avenues for pursuit of fairness that employees once had to protest against this blatant action was surgically removed when it became clear that not everyone was as stupid as they would have liked them to be.
    Among those brought in at the highest level to orchestrate this was a low level (and incompetent) manager from one of the Bell subsidiaries in the US, who replace one of this country's most brilliant people, to head up the show. He subsequently squandered millions of our dollars by installing 1950s era coaxial cable technology for our cable tv system during the 1990s when fibre was available and could have been installed for the same or lower cost. That 's right we could have had Fibre to the Premises (FTTP) way back then!
    The artificial introduction of competition to a market that could not sustain it was simply the act of greedy big end of towners who mistakenly thought the telco was a gravy train. (as it is in the US and UK) The bits missing in their calculations were firstly and most obviously that the US has a population of 300 million in a similar area to this country that has only 20 million and they still had a telecom system that was inferior to ours, mainly because of profiteering by private telcos and zero regulation. Secondly the sheer capital value of the infrastructure in this country combined with the enormous intellectual property, (most of which was resident in the heads of the employees) was ridiculously underestimated and as a consequence the competitors went bust when they couldn't get any of their own stuff working despite huge hand outs and free assistance from the public telco at the behest of the Federal Government.
    Despite going bust, (still owing the public telco millions for the work they were supposed to pay for) some of the names persisted (as new entities) and by concentrating on only highly profitable low cost sectors of the market newer names entered, but there simply is not enough room in the market for more than one player and all continue to be heavily propped up by the public telco whom is also prevented from competing with them by, for example, not being allowed to lift the cap on ASDL 1 and not releasing ADSL 2+. What you do not seem to have picked up out of the comments in the article is that of course the public telco has ADSL 2+ ready and waiting to go. The other companies that supply it to you are only able to do so using the public telco's infrastructure, which I might add is subsidised by we the taxpayer to a ludicrous extent. We are in fact paying for it twice.
    The ultimate aim of this Government is to white ant the public telco to the point that it becomes unsustainable and worthless so that private hands can get a hold of it for practically nothing at the expense of we the taxpayers whom actually own it. Unless we stop just talking and actually do something there is no stopping this train. I could say so much more. Nothing is as it seems. The introduction of part privatisation and competition with the excuse that it was the only way to get prices down is an unmitigated lie. Until that time telco prices w

    Talk the Talk but can't walk the walk Kevin Emery -- 26/10/06

    What is that famous saying......

    You have to admit Telstra has a very good marketing department. It is just a pity the rest of the company can't keep up and deliver the services marketing talk about.

    Do they really have ADSL2+.... or is it just smoke and mirrors much like the FTTN.

    "I'm not afraid of anyone".... a bet a few roo's have thought that while standing in front of an oncoming road train...

    ADSL2+ is available now from most good ISP's so don't wait about for Telstra to find some real speed join one of the more progressive companies.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured