Telstra gets early end to ACCC fight

Telstra's battle with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) over the cost of access to its network could come to an early end, the telco has revealed.

Telstra has now had its constitutional challenge to the ACCC's "compulsory acquisition" of the ULL (unbundled local loop) referred to the High Court for early determination, according to the company.

The telco issued the legal challenge early this year after the competition watchdog cut the prices Telstra could charge rivals to use its network. The ACCC cut prices again this month, a move the company claimed could ultimately prevent investment in Australia's fibre-to-the-node network.

Telstra alleges the pricing that the ACCC has mandated is not enough to cover the costs the company incurs to run the infrastructure.

"This is property bought and paid for by Telstra's 1.6 million shareholders, [who] should not have their property taken without fair compensation which the Trade Practices Act fails to guarantee. Shareholders are currently denied this opportunity because the 'Constitutional safety net' provision contained in the Trade Practices Act is flawed," a statement from the company said.

The High Court is expected to hear the case in November this year and is expected to cost Telstra over AU$1 million in legal fees.

The ACCC refused to comment on Telstra's constitutional challenge.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Full of rubbish Jason Torrento -- 04/07/07

    That's what you get from Telstra.
    $1 million of those precious shareholder funds not invested in getting a investment return, no, but instead, they are going right out the window, in a legal challenge which time and time again, has proven Telstra to lose.

    They will lose this time, with the only win being the uncertainty they created among investors in the industry, who have levelled back the investment due to this legal action.

    The end result, competitors will continue investing, Telstra will whinge even louder and get ignored, and Australian consumers (the people that matter, even in the high court), will get a win for competition.

    I can understand "theft" and "compulsory acquisition", but they need to ask themselves, has any of that actually occurred? Telstra Wholesale's profit statements say No, they are still the most profitable within the Telstra arena.

    Justice. Sydney Lawrence -- 05/07/07 (in reply to #320082179)

    Jason while I have no reason to doubt your extensive knowledge of the law I think it may be best to leave the verdict to the High Court of Australia.

    The Real Problem Nathan Farquhar -- 05/07/07

    "This is property bought and paid for by Telstra's 1.6 million shareholders..." a statement from the company said.

    No it wasn't. This property was bought and paid for by the Government (from our taxes) before Telstra was sold off. Now that Telstra owns it they want to do their best to keep their monopoly and rip the Australian public off as much as possible.

    Thank God for the ACCC!

    Agreed Mame du Bois -- 05/07/07 (in reply to #320082208)

    Exactly, Telstra was built out of Australian tax-payers money.

    This is the exact reason why Telstra should have stayed government property.

    What frightens me is that there have been murmurs of privatising Australia Post. I hope the lessons from the Telstra debacle have been learned.

    That was then this is now Aaron, Sydney -- 05/07/07 (in reply to #320082208)

    Taxpayers built the company but now they got a commercial return and sold it off.

    Let Telstra invest their money their own way.

    Do we force Qantas to sell flights cheaper then it costs them, or commonwealth bank offer 2% home loans or NRMA free roadside service? The answer is NO!!! Why? Because they are private companies and are out to make a profit.

    Last time I checked the World Trade Centre was also demolished in the name of God.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured