Telstra demands right to raise prices

Telstra has asked the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to ease regulation in urban areas -- giving it the opportunity to put up prices on over five million phone lines.

According to Telstra, competition is booming in fixed line telecoms and, as a result, the ACCC can afford to ease off on the regulation. The telco believes that competition is now sufficient in wholesale line rental and local call services, and it should be "wound back across large areas of metropolitan Australia".

Telstra is hoping to persuade the ACCC to withdraw regulation principally across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra, and to a lesser extent, Hobart, Darwin and regional centres including Geelong, Ballarat, the Gold Coast and Launceston.

In a submission to the ACCC this week, Telstra cites the growth in deployments of DSLAM infrastructure by rivals as evidence of increased competition in the space. A recent report by the ACCC and ACMA found that Australia now has 19 companies supplying DSLAMs, a number which has not increased since the previous year.

"The level of access regulation -- which seeks to simulate a competitive market outcome -- should be inversely proportional to the level of competition. Yet this principle does not seem to hold for access regulation administered by the ACCC within the Australian telecommunications industry. Indeed, despite the intense growth in competition within the industry over the last 10 years, Telstra is now required to supply more regulated access services than it did when the competitive regime was established in 1997," the telco said in its submission to the regulator.

Should the ACCC grant Telstra's requests, the telco would be able to set its own wholesale fees for 371 exchanges covering 5.2 million phone lines -- and potentially increase prices.

However, the telco has hinted that removing the regulation that allows the watchdog to set the wholesale pricing could potentially lead to cheaper prices.

"Unnecessary regulation results in unnecessary costs, market distortions and inefficient outcomes, and will disincent [sic] innovation and investment," the submission said.

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    Rather synical... Anonymous -- 11/07/07

    Telstra are in a situation where they can't legally make their rates cheaper for their customers because that would be "uncompetative". How do we know they don't want to give their own customer a better deal?

    Just because the media beats up on them to get better ratings doesn't mean they're evil. It would do massive amounts of good to the Telco if they leveraged this to lower their rates.

    Keep Telstra Honest Anonymous -- 12/07/07 (in reply to #320082570)

    History clearly shows that Telstra will charge as much as they think they can get away with. History also shows that they will do what they can to disadvantage their competitors.

    Telstra did this a few years ago with ADSL wholesale and it resulted in a competition notice. You can be damn sure that if they were free to do what they liked in these areas with fixed lines, they would be using their dominant position in three seconds flat.

    With the current Telstra management, that is even more true than previously.

    It might ‘do massive amounts of good to the Telco if they leveraged this to lower their rates’, but it would be bad for the competition. Legislation and competition are the only things that keep Telstra honest. I dread to think what the telecommunications landscape in Australia would be like if we had less of both.

    This can be clearly seen by the prices Telstra want to charge on their FTTN network and the prices they DO charge on Next G, all while forcing customers of their CDMA resellers to move to Telstra and pay these usually higher prices if they want the coverage, due to not wholesaling Next G. This is a perfect example of Telstra using their dominant market position to disadvantage their competitors.

    The sooner people realise that Telstra trying to go back to the old way of being a great big monopoly might help their share price, but will ultimately cost them in higher telecommunications process. Bit of a false economy really.

    Time to abandon Dreamworld. Sydney Lawrence -- 31/07/07 (in reply to #320082591)

    What Planet do you come from? I would suggest Dreamworld. You state "Telstra will charge whatever they can get away with" open your eyes this is what every business in Australia does now.

    Further you demonstrate ignorance when you say "Telstra do what they can to disadvantage opponents". I thought this was a fundamental of Australian business, as is demonstrated by the Optus TV adds which name Telstra in an insulting and disparaging manner.

    Face facts, Telstra does it's opposition like a dinner because they offer customers superior services and better equipment and hang onto your hat for the humiliation and abject failure of the Opel debacle.

    Really... Troy White -- 12/07/07 (in reply to #320082570)

    Telstra have never ever given a "good deal" on anything.

    Line Rentals have never gone down. Local call costs have never gone down. Yes they have introduced capped calls and such but these only work for them because not everyone uses the cap.

    Don't get me started on their "broadband" offerings. For a start, they double dip by including your uploads in the monthly quota. The prices are not competitive compared to ANY other ISP.

    Do you really think they would LOWER the prices? Rubbish.

    On the contrary... Anonymous -- 18/07/07 (in reply to #320082609)

    Local calls have never gone down? Wow, didn't realise I was still paying 25 cents for a local call then...

    I find they have a very comprehensive range of plans and tariffs. Why? Because everybodys calling patterns are different.

    If you have put yourself on a capped plan and don't use it to it's full benefit, who's fault is that? Perhaps you would like to blame others for your lack of research on what suits you best maybe?

    Leave Telstra thoroughly shackled. Anonymous -- 12/07/07

    Have to agree with Troy's comment. There probably isn't a person alive in Australia over 40 who hasn't been victimised by Telstra, nee Telecom, nee PMG at least once over time.

    The current Telstra is nothing but an Oxygen Thief, a Yankee Oxygen Thief to be more specific, whose sole intention is to gouge and screw the hapless punters to enrich their shareholders.

    Lock em'up with regulation and throw away the key - the more they scream, the more joy I'll get.

    That's what their new wireless system is really all about - Next G(ouge). More expensive than competitors, more BS than competitors, and now they need to put a special tick on phones that allegedly will replace the CDMA network - what a crock.

    Happy one JamesThornly -- 11/08/07 (in reply to #320082617)

    I have been a satisfied customer of Telstra ( and previous operations) for thirty years and have always been extremely happy with their service and products.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured