Telstra 'can't close CDMA without govt permission'

The spat between Telstra and Communications Minister Helen Coonan has cranked up a notch, with the government introducing a draft guideline to prevent the telco switching off its CDMA network until its Next G replacement is deemed equal or better in coverage.

Senator Coonan and other government representatives have repeatedly voiced fears over the performance of the network, with the Minister writing to Telstra to request a delay in the CDMA switch-off.

The Minister said in a statement the government's hand has been forced by Telstra's "inaction" on reported Next G problems. "I have just spent the last six weeks on the road across Australia and based on the level of frustration in the community, it is clear that this issue needs Telstra's urgent and genuine attention," Senator Coonan said.

The government has now opened a Next G Support Unit, which will run a phone line -- 1800 883 488 -- for users to give details of any network problems they experience, as well as carrying out an audit on Telstra's Next G device line.

The telco plans to shut down its CDMA network in January and has itself stated its 3G Next G network will equal or beat the performance of CDMA by that point.

However, according to Senator Coonan, government intervention is necessary due to questions on the timeline of the switch off.

Telstra has said it won't be able to provide coverage details until October which, the Minister said, will not allow sufficient time before the January switch-off date for the Australia Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to carry out audits and government reviews to be conducted, in order to determine if Telstra has met its obligations.

A Telstra spokesperson said the guideline will have no impact on the company: "This is no different to what we've been saying for over a year now -- that Next G will be equal or better to CDMA."

The government has given Telstra CEO Sol Trujillo 30 days to comment on the draft guideline.

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    Telstra 'can't close CDMA without govt permission' Anonymous -- 07/08/07

    That would be a godsend to country people with limited service - with CDMA a prepaid amount is good for quite some time - when service is available punch in the numbers and we are one air - once CDMA it is turned off and NextG is left we have to pay a minimum monthly amount or the number is lost!
    Corporate greed!

    CDMA Simon goslett -- 07/08/07

    Why this rush big to 3G? Most people don't want mobile data, they just want a mobile phone, for as little as possible. So the majority will be forced to move to 3G and be charged significantly more for the same service, or less. Sounds like shooting fish in a barrel, oh that's right, it's what Telstra does!

    CDMA Anonymous -- 10/08/07 (in reply to #320084028)

    Exactly - Simon
    I have had many calls from Telstra extolling the virtues of NextG and during discussions with their "telemarketers" not once has one said "You can phone someone and TALK to them" they keep on about Internet, Email, pictures, videos etc!
    Good Grief!

    CDMA&Mobiles Brian Pratt -- 23/11/07 (in reply to #320084028)

    Most of us just want good coverage and to phone & txt.CDMA had good coverage & price offers far better than NextG or 3G..Why did it have to change for the worse???.once signed into CDMA,now forced to sign up with NextG at FAR greater costs & no better coverage.I've been conned...........Regards

    Who owns what business? Anonymous -- 07/08/07

    Just who runs the phone networks here? The ACCC, Telstra, the government... oh sorry, they used to have something called Telecom, didn't they sell that off? Does the senator still own a mobile network - I don't think so. If company X or Y or Z wants to switch on or off a network, surely that's got nothing to do with the government. Here's an idea senator Coonan, get Optus to provide the missing coverage in the bush.. that way everyone would be happy surely?

    CDMA Anonymous -- 02/10/07

    There are currently many 1000's of Australian Pensioner travelling though out Australia with CDMA mobiles as there only form of communication.We cannot accept the additional expence or $300 for a new mobile or the additional prepaid costs of the new next-G Telstra system, it will cost a minimum of $200 a year to have a prepaid N-G mobile + plus a New Phone. Perhaps Telstra can pay us all 12 million a year so we to can afford there network or just a fair go mate.

    plans not changing, just a handset upgrade Jimmy -- 02/10/07 (in reply to #320087073)

    you mention $200 per year for a next g plan, are you getting it for free now. If you are paying $20 per month today you will pay $20 per month with next g if you use it the same way. the only cost is to replace the handset and there are plenty of subsidies and offers out there, someone else metioned harvey norman handing out $200 to upgrade.

    CDMA Closure Anonymous -- 12/10/07

    All I want is a mobile that I can use as little or as much as I wish. I usually only make a few calls, no texting or anything else.
    Frankly, I do not care, if the service will be better or not.
    My gripe, is this. If my mobile phone is in perfectly good working order, why should I be out of pocket whatsoever.
    If, for example, Channel 10, decided to broadcast television programs on a frequency that I could not pick up, would they expect me to buy a whole new Television. I don't think so.

    I discussed this with a Telstra operator yesterday, and was told, that they will give me $50 towards a new phone, and if I purchase credit over $30 they will double the amount and this will be for 1 years use. But, of course, as far as I am concerned this is still not enough, considering that the cheapest basic phone is $150. Therefore I will be looking at other options.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured