Telecomms ombudsman toughens broadband watch

By Iain Ferguson
12 June 2003 06:20 PM
Tags: pinnock, tio, john, complaints, warning, broadband, internet, consumer
The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is considering measures to monitor broadband Internet services more closely after complaints rose by 45 percent from March 2002-April 2003.

The TIO, John Pinnock, said the organisation -- which provides the last resort for individuals and businesses in dispute with telecommunications companies -- was considering some alterations to its database to allow it to identify and categorise complaints based on whether they related to satellite, cable, ADSL or other delivery platform.

"We would find out whether any particular category of platform was producing any more broadband complaints than any other".

Pinnock said while a final decision would be made on 1 July, his preliminary view was that the move was "worth trying". He said it stemmed largely from a request from the Australian Communications Authority for platform-specific complaints data.

The news came as Pinnock warned consumers against the excessive bills generated by use of file-sharing services as complaints over broadband Internet services continue to rise.

Pinnock told ZDNet Australia   he was concerned many new broadband users had not previously used an Internet service -- with their inexperience and lack of understanding of billing practices leading them to rack up unexpectedly huge bills.

Pinnock cited one instance in which a young woman who had broadband Internet connected shortly after moving into a new residence racked up a bill of around AU$10,000.

He said, however, that while he had criticised telecommunications carriers from around a year ago -- when many introduced limits on usage -- about their provision of information to the user community, he now felt enough information was available to place some onus on the consumer to pick up their knowledge of the available options.

Pinnock said consumer complaints over contracts, faults and provisioning difficulties with xDSL and cable Internet services had risen by 45 percent to 1,151 in the year from April 2002 to March 2003. The TIO recorded 240 complaints in the June quarter 2002, rising to 349 in the March quarter this year.

He said in a statement the rise in broadband Internet complaints was in line with an increase in consumer take-up of broadband technologies, and was not of itself a cause for concern.

"Complaint numbers are always high when it comes to new technologies," he said. "It can take months or even years for consumers and the industry to become accustomed to new methods and systems for billing and provision".

Pinnock lauded Telstra's new BigPond Internet usage meter after months of debate over the lack of accuracy of the carrier's previous version, saying the telco had "taken some really good steps".

"In general, Telstra has improved its performance considerably".

However, Pinnock did say he had some reservations about contracts in general in the telecommunications industry, noting that some were "unbalanced" in that they imposed enormous responsibility on the customer without necessarily imposing a similar level of responsibility on the carrier.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    Neither Telstra OR the ombudsm ...Anonymous -- 13/06/03

    Neither Telstra OR the ombudsman can get their act together this is the issue. The ombudsman is useless and Telstra does not have a clue on how to run anything

    The TIO never takes action whi ...Keith Styles (An irate user) -- 13/06/03

    The TIO never takes action which might embarrass any of the Telcos. It makes a lot of noise, but is mostly all P*ss & Wind. As I understand it, the TIO is nothing more than a corporation set up by the Telcos to field the complaints and shoulder the responsibilities leveled at them. This lets the Telcos leverage as much as possible from the public, while the TIO wastes time doing nothing. The major share holders in the TIO are the Phone companies. So is the TIO likely to be heavy handed with the Telcos, especially the monopoly stake holders IE: T(H)elstra, Iprimus, Optus etc.
    I DON'T THINK SO !! It's all a big rip off!

    Why do ISPs in Australia charg ...Anonymous -- 15/06/03

    Why do ISPs in Australia charge for downloads. This practice is not seen in most of the rest of the western world. This a very unfair charge. Afterall, users already pay dearly for Internet Access in Australia. That access is meant to be a specified bandwidth, why then are we charged again for using this bandwidth. If the same concept was apportioned to voice traffic then we would be charged by the word count on our conversations.
    I have recently returned from working in the ISP / Telecoms Market Place in both the US and Europe. Internet Access in Australia is vastly more expensive than these countries, both dial up and Broardband. On top of these huge access fees and plans the Austarlian internet user is also then charged for downloads. This is a blatent rip off of the Australian public. Something must be done.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured