Strike is hurting Telstra

A Telstra management presentation seen by ZDNet.com.au showed this week that Telstra has been feeling the effects of industrial action, despite the telco denying the union moves were having any effect on customers.

(On Strike image by Seth Anderson, CC2.0)

The presentation, a regular briefing on service and facility operations, was dated Friday 13 March 2009. It said that the industrial action had overwhelmed global network operations alarm monitoring staff.

Because of this, network services withdrew a number of planned upgrades called APECs or Approved Planned Event Coordinations, which caused more chaos for the telco.

"In many cases, service delivery field staff have been assigned to attend sites in the middle of the night only to discover that they had not been notified of the withdrawal of the APEC. They were then on lost time next day for nothing due to Stand Down time," the report noted.

Telstra had moved to battle this problem, however, putting in new procedures for the change management team to review withdrawals and make sure that communications technicians were notified of the withdrawals.

Despite showing the telco acted on its problems, the presentation has shown that Telstra's operations are being affected by industrial action. When the telecommunications company has previously commented on action, it has pointed out that only 15 per cent of its employees were members of a union and has downplayed any effects of the action.

When asked for comment on the issue, Telstra said only that it hadn't seen the document and that the action was having "almost zero impact" on the business.

The unions began to strike in December last year. Earlier in that year, the unions had been negotiating with Telstra, hoping to create a new union agreement for employees whose Australian Workplace Agreements were coming to an end. These negotiations fell apart, however, and after attempting to approach the situation via the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and having no luck, the unions put a vote to its members on whether they wanted to strike.

The members voted overwhelmingly in favour of a strike and small units of employees have been walking off the job or refusing to do overtime or take call backs.

Coverage in the strike has died down in the media, but the unions have been adamant that this has not meant that the strike has had no effect.

Advertisement

Talkback 26 comments

    Don't kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09

    Keep up the effort to damage Telstra boys perhaps you will be there long enough to see Christmas.

    A golden egghead comment Anonymous -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129157)

    Sydney, if you think that employees are striking because they want to damage Telstra then you are a goose!

    Sel, sell, sell Anonymous -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129157)

    Sydney, for ***k sake sell your shares and give us all a break.

    Everybody speak up. Sydney Lawrence -- 10/04/09 (in reply to #320129189)

    Our freedom depends on the liberty of free speech, which cannot be limited without being lost.

    At least I don't cowardly hide behind the "Anonymous" tag.

    I will Steve -- 10/04/09 (in reply to #320129219)

    We have gone on strike for a wage rise and to protect our terms and conditions. If you don't work for the company or have any first hand knowledge of what has gone on over the past 8 months you aren't really able to comment.

    If we are only there till christmas it is due to management arrogance and bad decision making.

    Ie NBN, seibal billing and other upgrades that have put staff under unbelievable amounts of stress and are way over budget.

    Get a good look. Anonymous -- 10/04/09 (in reply to #320129239)

    I'll hide behind a anonymous tag because employees (who have no other way of speaking out against their employer) will be without a job for speaking out!

    Fact is, Telstra is a company playing hardball with it's employees and refusing to renegotiate a Union endorsed agreement for them. They wish to cut out any 'standard' agreement clauses and leave employees with a take-it-or-leave-it option. Whilst for some thing this is fine, try working in an environment where mis-management is causing less people to do more work than they can handle or passing work off to incompetent contract companies and leaving the mess for a couple of leftover Telstra staff to clean up. Too many cooks.... too many chiefs, not enough indians - is the phrase that comes to mind.

    In the last few years, Telstra employees who do an excellent job have gone from being happy in their job to being badly shafted and are now completely annoyed with all attempts to 'manage' their jobs out the door under false measures. Or are simply taking the work stress home.

    A good example, after 30 years of employment a Telstra worker was made redundant - returned their work vehicle to the depot with all tools and equipment and was told to find their own way home, whilst at the same time several managers took a taxi to lunch to celebrate a useless milestone in how many jobs they'd done.

    Makes perfect sense.

    Most employees aren't interested in hurting Telstra, they would just like some fair treatment from management.

    (The author does indeed own telstra shares).

    @Get a good look Anonymous -- 13/04/09 (in reply to #320129300)

    I was a member of the union and have no love for Telstra HR. I quit the union in disgust when it became clear that their primary interest was for themselves and not the people they claimed to represent. My dislike of Telstra HR remains, but it is now a matter of the lesser of two evils.

    The same thing has happened again here. From what I could see, there was not one existing condition that was being withdrawn, but a heap of new ones put on the table including the ability to salary sacrifice everything from phone calls to a car. Also on the table was a pay increase that in these economic times, will not be seen again for a long time. Sure, there was no union involvement in the offer which is clearly what pissed the unions off the most. The fact that it was a good offer probably upset them more.

    Again, they were confronted with a simple choice. They had to either support their members or their own narrow political agenda. Their members missed out again, having been conned into rejecting the agreement in the false hope that the unions will be able to get them something better.

    So, at the time the offer was made, the Award employees hadn't had a pay rise for a year. The offer was made in September last year, so it is now over a year and a half since their last pay rise. The unions wait in hope that the Rudd government will give them the ability to force new negotiations. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Let's assume they do. So, by the time the legislation comes into law, it will be about two years from the last pay rise. Add another six months of haggling over a new agreement and 2 1/2 years after the last pay rise, the unions will have a negotiated deal in place.

    What will that deal contain? A pay rise almost certainly, but one big enough to put their members in a better position than they would be had they accepted the deal first put in front of them in the first place? Highly unlikely. They'd need 9-10% in the first year just to catch up to where they would have been, and more if they want to be better off. What about the other conditions? Nothing was taken away in the original deal and what was added were things that had good material value. Do the unions really believe they can do better in the current economic climate?

    The unions have put themselves into an awkward corner. They have to to make the rejection of the agreement offered justified, but it is a pretty tall order. If they succeed in getting a superior deal, they will be condemned as irresponsible and will set themselves up for the blame for any future job losses. If they fall short, they will be justifiably viewed as having sold out their members for their own ends. Talk about seizing defeat from the jaws of victory!

    There has been a lot of rhetoric from both sides. The facts are there. You have clearly stopped reading the HR rhetoric, which is good. Now do the same with the union garbage and look after your own interests.

    re:@Get a good look John -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129521)

    Perfectly stated. Perhaps if the bullying ACTU did not interfere with thier irresponsible 'side agreements' then negotiations would most probably been conducted as they have in the poast, and thier members received a well earned pay rise. What have Burrows and Lawrence done to undo the damage they have caused to CEPU members??

    everbody speak up................. except Anonymous -- 10/04/09 (in reply to #320129219)

    everyone, freedom, liberty, speak up..............

    except you cowards who hide behind an anonymous tag and don't have tel$tra shares, you shut up.

    Speakers Lament Dingo Bob -- 10/04/09 (in reply to #320129219)

    Our freedom as Telstra workers also depend on liberty of choice for union representation for a collective workplace agreement. What Telstra management did was to blatantly deny us of that right.

    Instead, they choose to shove a reharshed AWA down the throats of workers under the guise of an ECA. A document that has been branded as disadvantageous to Telstra workers by a Federal Court judge [source: ZDnet.com.au] in that it creates two class of workers [due to its part A/B format.] This the same management that touts the "One Team" buzz word on the other hand. Now that the un-negotiated ECA has been voted down in many parts of the company we simply want management to go back to negotiation with our chosen representatives. After all we have contributed to the large bonuses the execs and the company itself has enjoyed over these many years. Although we havent seen a payrise in two years.

    Misunderstanding your options me -- 17/04/09 (in reply to #320129299)

    Obviously dingo you didnt read what was offered properly. Nothing is going to be a rehashed AWA as you now have mandatory unfair dismisal options again for a start.

    The Part A/B format was to protect those on award who didnt want to go onto a comission based structure from my own personal understanding?

    Why criticise for an attempt to give more choice?

    and to be fair to you, if your a union member, sure you should be able to have them represent you, but please dont use the collective "Our" as most of us Big T workers dont want to pay a percentage of our yearly wage to make union boss's rich.

    Sydney Troll Anonymous -- 12/04/09 (in reply to #320129157)

    Whey do people still argue with Sydney Lawrence. Hes just a troll!

    Sydney Troll Anonymous -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129431)

    What a stupid comment that was. Why the hell would you even bother ?

    Telstra, and their mishandling of truth Anonymous -- 10/04/09

    I am a Bigpond customer, and besides suffering loss of service for 14 hours, the weekend before last, i have had two minor one hour losses of service since.

    Their lack of response to my complaints about the Bigpond webmail since the major outage have been pitiful to say the least. i cannot access the Webmail to find emails which have fallen through the cracks between the Webmail Server, and my Microsoft Outlook 2007, because the Wemail is unavailable.

    Heaven only knows what has happened to them.

    Also, with Telstra one cannot complain about the service, because there is none,

    I tried for over 8 weeks last year to get my I.S.D. (overseas dialling) put back onto my telephone service, giving up at Christmas, which was why i wanted it.

    I started, again in late March, to get the service again, with the same results, although i had been promised each time, the same as last year, that i would get it back, as it had previously been on my phone service.

    I expect to have Telstra search the records to find out who i am so that they can make an example out of me, as they have done to others who have spoken out.

    If i were not tied into a contract until the end of this year, at least, I would have gone to another Provider.

    Pimpernels and complaints. Sydney Lawrence -- 11/04/09 (in reply to #320129309)

    Anon your complaints surprise me.

    I have been a Telstra customer for thirty years and have enjoyed Bigpond for many of those years. Service has been excellent and any complaints investigated and solved quickly.

    In fact many of my friends have changed to Telstra mostly because of dissatisfaction with competitors products. Your litany of complaints do tend me to think you may have other motives for your disparaging of Telstra.

    the motive king Anonymous -- 11/04/09 (in reply to #320129348)

    sydney your reply does not surprise.

    not everyone who complains has a motive against or is disparaging telstra. just like not everyone saying a nice thing or two, has a motive.

    but speaking of other motives, i know of one man who posts everywhere, praising telstra and he definitely has a selfish, greedy motive, relating to shares.

    he won't accept anyone else's situation or admit telstra aren't perfect, because of the money he has invested in telstra. it is quite sickening to read the motive king's daily drivel, particularly as he always accuses everyone else of a having another motive.

    i wonder if he realises that his selfish approach is actually turning more and more people against telstra?

    i'm sure you know him better than any of us, sydney.

    The Last Post. Sydney Lawrence -- 11/04/09 (in reply to #320129353)

    I came , I saw, I tried my best with limited resources to bring some fairness and balance to the NBN debate.

    Alas, after much hostile derision I have decided it is useless trying to preach to the converted.

    So with a heavy heart, and some hope for the future, with malace to none I say adios , goodbye and best wishes.

    Bye then Simon -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129373)

    Sydney, that's great news!

    You faced an uphill battle to convince anyone that Telstra was worth any consideration, let alone knew anything about customer service.

    Bye, can't say I'll miss your telstra marketing campaign though. In the end even Telstra have admitted they were wrong (NBN, separation etc)

    Bye then Anonymous -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129637)

    Whatever, Jason.

    paranoia, rofl!!!! Jason -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129735)

    haha, must be terrible to be so paranoid that everyone's Jason, but I like it, rofl

    The Last Post. Anonymous -- 15/04/09 (in reply to #320129373)

    Sad to hear Sydney. At least your input was positive and polite, unlike that serial creep Jason, with his multitude of aliases, and his moronic comments. IMHO you would be welcome back anytime.

    Wow Jason -- 15/04/09 (in reply to #320129822)

    If I didn't know better Brad (Mel Sommersberg, Lord ((haha) Watchdog, Steve, Anonymous/ troll/idiot heckler), I'd swear that was the comments of the "moronic sock puppet".

    The burnt and bruised parrot, who has nowhere left to go but name calling and who keeps using my lines (like multitude of aliases, wherever did you get that from haha) because he has no comprehension of anything.

    Yes, SYDNEY **** the destitute, dumb***k Telstra shareholder.

    Good thing I know better though, hey Brad.

    pimpernels Davoe -- 14/04/09 (in reply to #320129348)

    hmm
    obviously it was the Labor government and the Unions that were the cause for your complaints. Nothing to do with Telstra's neglect of its own network.

    The Last Post Cabel -- 13/04/09

    Is that really your last post, what are you going to do with your rtetirement if you're not posting comments? That's not to say i didn't dislike your pro-telstra comments

    41 years in Telstra Disillusioned -- 19/06/09

    The last ECA offer was a direct cop of the ACTU's deal it struck for some Queensland workers.
    The offer of 4.5% + 4% + 4% was made before the economic meltdown.
    The Union put on the table it's own agenda plus a wage increase. The request for paid leave for union reps etc was illegal and Telstra walked away from the table.
    Thus the union itself ruined the deal.
    They were waiting for Ms Gillard to draft new workplace laws to support their right to ask for special conditions for union reps etc. Sadly I missed out on a fair offer from my company due to these Socialists in the union.

    @41 Anonymous -- 19/06/09 (in reply to #320144671)

    oh well never mind, you still have those high flying telstra shares to fall back on.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue All I want for Xmas is Telstra pricing
    Five consecutive days without broadband has led me to what seemed at the time to be an act of desperation: contemplating signing up for Telstra's 100Mbps cable modem service.
  • Array Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured