Spam enforcer says hands are tied on Prime Minister scandal

The government agency charged with policing Australia's anti-spam legislation initially seemed to rule out investigating a spamming scandal involving the Prime Minister, John Howard and his son, Tim Howard.

However, the Australian Communications Authority said the matter would be "discussed" during a government review next year of the operation of Australia's Spam Act.

Howard has admitted he had hired his son's company, Net Harbour, to distribute e-mails containing promotional Liberal Party electoral material to voters in his electorate of Bennelong.

ACA anti-spam manager Anthony Wing pointed out that the Spam Act clearly only covers commercial spam and "does not cover non-commercial ones such as charities and election [materials] by registered political parties".

"As far as I'm aware, it is purely electoral material and there are no restrictions under the Spam Act on electoral materials," Wing said.

The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper quoted one recipient of the e-mails -- who resides outside the Bennelong electorate -- as being angry and concerned about how Net Harbour got hold of her address.

Wing said if further complaints came in from recipients of the unsolicited e-mails, the regulator would take a look at the contents of the e-mail. However, the ACA's hands are tied, he said, and the organisation will not be able to investigate the matter in the context of any breaches of the Spam Act.

"We apply the Spam Act as it stands at the moment," he said.

John Howard told ABC Radio in Hobart today he had personally funded the campaign being spread by Net Harbour, but would not disclose how much it cost.

"That is my business because it's not public money, it's private Howard money and I don't intend to disclose that because it's a private matter," Howard told listeners. "It is being sent out in my name as the Member for Bennelong".

Net Harbour refused to make any comment about the issue.

Shadow minister for ICT, Kate Lundy, said the Prime Minister had breached the "spirit" of the anti-spam law and described the situation as a case of double standards.

"The Prime Minister has breached the spirit, if not the letter of anti-spam laws. John Howard's government banned commercial spamming this year, but then the Prime Minister goes ahead and spams the public for political benefit -- this is a clear case of double standards," Lundy said.

Lundy believes the ACA should investigate Howard's use of spam. However, she added that it was questionable whether engaging a commercial company to send spam breached the Spam Act.

"Mr Howard obviously thinks he is either above the law or is cynically exploiting a loophole against the spirit and principle of a law his own government has been touting as evidence of its social responsibility for the past year," she said.

An announcement of a federal election date is imminent with speculation rife after John Howard's plans to visit Canberra this weekend. While Howard has declined to comment about what he may do on Saturday or Sunday, pundits are speculating that his itinerary may include a visit to Government House to advise the governor-general of his plans to hold a federal election.

See our exclusive coverage of the Election 07: Coonan vs Conroy debate

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 22 comments

  1. /^From:*netharbour\.*/ REJECT no spam little jonny I dont care, I will not accept this garbage through my mail servers. All spammers deserve to die a long slow painful death Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    /^From:*netharbour\.*/ REJECT no spam little jonny

    I dont care, I will not accept this garbage through my mail servers. All spammers deserve to die a long slow painful death

  2. Much as I disagree with spam of any type, this business about breaking the spirit of the anti-spam law is crap, as the anti-spam law specifically excluded political and charity spams. If we don't like it, we should agitate for the law to be changed, not Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    Much as I disagree with spam of any type, this business about breaking the spirit of the anti-spam law is crap, as the anti-spam law specifically excluded political and charity spams. If we don't like it, we should agitate for the law to be changed, not snivel about 'spirit of the law'

    And what is this 'electorage' ? The correct word is electorate. Geographic filtering for email is some distance off.

  3. I run a software company and do not send out any unsolicted emails. I receive around 80 unsolicted emails per day. Its now at the point where email is becoming a difficult tool to use. I cant change my email address as I have built up a sizeable customer Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    I run a software company and do not send out any unsolicted emails. I receive around 80 unsolicted emails per day. Its now at the point where email is becoming a difficult tool to use. I cant change my email address as I have built up a sizeable customer database. I used to have a catchall email address for my domain, but 2 days ago I had to turned the catchall off as now some companies have hired spammers and are using my domain with random email address to send out their unsolicted junk email which is touting VIAGRA drugs and Mortgage deals (around 6 bounced emails per minute were coming into my catchall email address). So now they are using my domain without my consent and spamming the world tarnishing the good name of my company. Does anyone have any ideas on how I can stop these people? I have the names of the company's who are selling their goods, but I think there is little I can do. As for Mr. Howard, this is a double standard, unsolicted email is SPAM, there is NO GREY AREA. You either have requested email, or you have not.

  4. Why on earth (or in cyberspace) would any politician who opens his/her email box each morning, to the usual 20 - 30 spam emails, do something as brainless as this? Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    Why on earth (or in cyberspace) would any politician who opens his/her email box each morning, to the usual 20 - 30 spam emails, do something as brainless as this?

  5. 20 to 30 spam emails per day??? Wow what am I doing wrong? I use Mcafee Spamfighter and get close to 100 spam emails in my "ACCEPTED" messages folder every day that the software thinks is legitimate. In my blocked messages folder I get at leas Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    20 to 30 spam emails per day??? Wow what am I doing wrong? I use Mcafee Spamfighter and get close to 100 spam emails in my "ACCEPTED" messages folder every day that the software thinks is legitimate. In my blocked messages folder I get at least 300 spam emails per day. If I don't check my email for a few days I have often been faced with well over 1000 emails, of which maybe 70 or 80 would be from known mail lists or people.

  6. So once again this is a man who says he believes in family values.... so long as they suite his political objectives. NOT HAPPY, LITTLE JOHNNY Time to sit in the corner till you learn the difference between truth and smart-ars**deception. Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    So once again this is a man who says he believes in family values.... so long as they suite his political objectives.

    NOT HAPPY, LITTLE JOHNNY
    Time to sit in the corner till you learn the difference between truth and smart-ars**deception.

  7. The Antispam stuff was always a double standard - but that's like everything politicians do - one rule for us and another for them. It's pathetic and reflects arrogance & lack of ethics on the part of politicians - but how do we stop it ? Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    The Antispam stuff was always a double standard - but that's like everything politicians do - one rule for us and another for them. It's pathetic and reflects arrogance & lack of ethics on the part of politicians - but how do we stop it ?

  8. This is as biased a piece of reporting as I've seen for some time. Clearly what has been done is lawful, and the word "scandal" an emotive play which demonstrates the bias of the reporter. I expect the opposition to use words like "not the Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    This is as biased a piece of reporting as I've seen for some time. Clearly what has been done is lawful, and the word "scandal" an emotive play which demonstrates the bias of the reporter. I expect the opposition to use words like "not the spirit" of the legislation, but not a reporter paid to deliver fact, rather than appear as a Labour Party sycophant.

  9. So, does this mean I could personally spam a pile of people and get away with it ? Could I buy a $29- CD with 500,000 email addresses and send my political or religous thoughts to all without punishment ? Hmmmm ... Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    So, does this mean I could personally spam a pile of people and get away with it ? Could I buy a $29- CD with 500,000 email addresses and send my political or religous thoughts to all without punishment ? Hmmmm ...

  10. If the Labour Party spent as much time doing their jobs as they do raking muck this Country of ours would be much better of. Better still get rid of the Labour Party and we would all be the better for it. The act as it is written clearly allows for the ac Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    If the Labour Party spent as much time doing their jobs as they do raking muck this Country of ours would be much better of. Better still get rid of the Labour Party and we would all be the better for it. The act as it is written clearly allows for the actions of the P.M. so stop winging and start doing things the same way if it aint illegal

  11. The issue here is the way the spam laws have been written to allow politicians to engage in the similar behaviour to that they've sought to outlaw. Chances are Howard's spam stunt will backfire. Everyone hates unsolicited email. Howard just loo Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    The issue here is the way the spam laws have been written to allow politicians to engage in the similar behaviour to that they've sought to outlaw.

    Chances are Howard's spam stunt will backfire. Everyone hates unsolicited email. Howard just looks foolish in thinking he can do something like this and people will put up with it.

    If politicians want to use the Internet properly, there are many experts out there that can show them - using evidence to back things up - that sending spam is probably the least effective way of running a campaign -> but a surefire way of giving your opponents ammunition to use against you.

  12. Yeah, sure, the Labor party paid them to write it. OK . . . Is ANYONE who supports the Liberal party capable of uttering a single word that even resembles truth or reality? What planet do you people live on? Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    Yeah, sure, the Labor party paid them to write it. OK . . . Is ANYONE who supports the Liberal party capable of uttering a single word that even resembles truth or reality? What planet do you people live on?

  13. This a commercial activity because Howard is a professional politian. Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    This a commercial activity because Howard is a professional politian.

  14. It may not be in breach of the Spam act, but as they have included recipient names in the e-mail It may be breach of the privacy act !! Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    It may not be in breach of the Spam act, but as they have included recipient names in the e-mail It may be breach of the privacy act !!

  15. How about creating an email flood on the senders mail servers ? Just something a little different. Get them before they get you. All illegal I suppose; but tempting, just proves the big end of town can do as they like. Anonymous -- 27/08/04

    How about creating an email flood on the senders mail servers ?
    Just something a little different.
    Get them before they get you.
    All illegal I suppose; but tempting, just proves the big end of town can do as they like.

  16. Another media beat up jamming our in-boxes - that's the 'scandal'. The subject matter is 'clearly' about permitted useage under the Act. This is more about a journo's politics (or inexperience)- may KM-L should choose another audience for her Anonymous -- 28/08/04

    Another media beat up jamming our in-boxes - that's the 'scandal'.

    The subject matter is 'clearly' about permitted useage under the Act. This is more about a journo's politics (or inexperience)- may KM-L should choose another audience for her passions. Here, most of us want ZDNET to send us the News we signed up for - not another kind of 'junk'.

  17. This is not another media beatup but a further example of how Honest Johnny will twist the truth or reality to suite his own political gain. The proliferation of SPAM is one of the most obnoxious ascects of the internet and for Honest John to stoop t Anonymous -- 28/08/04

    This is not another media beatup but a further example of how Honest Johnny will twist the truth or reality to suite his own political gain.
    The proliferation of SPAM is one of the most obnoxious ascects of the internet and for Honest John to stoop to using his family to promote spam is a true indication of his family values and total lack of respect for the Aussie people.
    The public has a right to know and voice their opinion about Honest John and his use of WMD's - Weapons of Mass Deception.

  18. Its funny how you losers have your panties in a knot because your lovely prime minister has done a boo-boo again. If you dont want to read bad things about lil johnny, dont read other websites! And by the way, while you fume and lose sleep over how " Anonymous -- 28/08/04

    Its funny how you losers have your panties in a knot because your lovely prime minister has done a boo-boo again. If you dont want to read bad things about lil johnny, dont read other websites! And by the way, while you fume and lose sleep over how "biased" the journo is about this story, she is probably laughing her head off because of the traffic her story is getting. Hahahha!!!

  19. How about doing something legal, and constructive, like putting the Liberal party's mail server on a few black hole databases? Sure are a lot of anonymous posters here. What's the collective noun for 'Anonymous Coward' ? Anonymous -- 28/08/04

    How about doing something legal, and constructive, like putting the Liberal party's mail server on a few black hole databases?

    Sure are a lot of anonymous posters here. What's the collective noun for 'Anonymous Coward' ?

  20. Will Little Johnny spam for Viagra next? If nothing else, it only shows the coalition as being in the same category as the PayPal scammers, pornographers and pill pushers. C'mon Johnny, announce the election date so we can drop *you* Anonymous -- 29/08/04

    Will Little Johnny spam for Viagra next?

    If nothing else, it only shows the coalition as being in the same category as the PayPal scammers, pornographers and pill pushers.

    C'mon Johnny, announce the election date so we can drop *you* in the Recycle Bin!

  21. What about following their op-out policy and sending a pro-active email. Then if they do send it you can abuse them for misleading conduct and not following their opt-out policy. Just email mailto:support@netharbour.com.au Opt-Out Pol Anonymous -- 30/08/04

    What about following their op-out policy and sending a pro-active email. Then if they do send it you can abuse them for misleading conduct and not following their opt-out policy.

    Just email mailto:support@netharbour.com.au

    Opt-Out Policy
    Net Harbour offers you a means to choose how we may use information you provided. If, at any time after registering for information or ordering the Services, you change your mind about receiving information from us or about sharing information with third parties, send us a request specifying your new choice. Send your request to support@netharbour.com.au.

  22. How 'ard it is to love the truth When Ego craves the polling booth. Anonymous -- 03/09/04

    How 'ard it is to love the truth When Ego craves the polling booth.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Telstra's BT coat doesn't fit
    The vision of the future BT portrayed this week at an Australian conference was so far removed from how Telstra's David Quilty has described the British telco that I wonder if they were talking about the same UK.
  • Array Australian security: the lucky country
    Does anyone seriously believe that Australian businesses and government agencies manage security any better than the US or UK?
  • Array Storage infrastructure on the tender track
    For a large-scale storage project, it's not uncommon to go out to tender for the best deal — but when was the last time you had to put together a tender for a document management room?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured