Sinking or swimming on spam

commentary Is Australia drowning in spam? Iain Ferguson, News Editor, ZDNet Australia

The federal government this week lauded the Spam Act 2003 as a "leading legislative model" in fighting unsolicited bulk electronic messaging and claimed "many professional spammers that had been based in Australia have either shut up shop or left the country".

However, Australian legislation can at best have only a minimal impact on spam being sent to Australians. The vast majority of such messages come from overseas.

A discussion paper released to prompt public input into a government review of the Act notes that spam is continuing to increase as a percentage of global e-mail, despite improvements to filtering systems.

Spam e-mail also continues to migrate swiftly from a vehicle for badly worded direct marketing promotions to a carrier for phishing scams and malicious code such as viruses or Trojans.

Exemplifying this problem is the spread of the latest variant of the Sober virus -- with a new global epidemic predicted for 5 January -- and the severe strain it is expected to place on mail servers.

While the sheer volume of messages is a problem, the growing sophistication of e-mail scamming is presenting a greater threat -- particularly the practice of so-called "spear-phishing," whereby recipients are targeted individually rather than via a mass mail-out.

On 15 June this year, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission warned that phishing scams were becoming a serious problem and that complaints had doubled over the previous few months.

In addition to these worrying trends, according to the government's discussion paper, mobile text messages are becoming more of a problem. In Australia, complaints over mobile text message spam now accounts for 10 percent of complaints referred to the Australian Communications and Multimedia Authority (ACMA).

The government is making an effort to fight the impact of these trends on Australians through memoranda of understanding and collaboration with countries such as Korea, but the fact is the problem will continue to grow unless there is a real will and commitment on behalf of authorities worldwide.

Even then, the ease with which individuals can distribute spam -- with malicious intent or otherwise -- means the problem is unlikely to go away any time soon. The unpalatable truth is, heading into the new year, spam and its associated malicious payloads are going to be a tax on business and a headache for users in Australia well into the foreseeable future.

What do you think? Is Australia winning the spam war or are we sinking under a morass of increasingly malicious e-mails compromising our systems or searching with ever-increasing efficiency for our personal financial details? How can we fight back? E-mail us at edit@zdnet.com.au and give us your thoughts.

Iain Ferguson is the News Editor of ZDNet Australia.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

  1. spam scott -- 18/12/05

    yes spam is a problem never open attachments that u are never 100% sure of there contents i had an updated anti -virus and it was a virus as my anti-virus picked up(hmm another backdoor), so if u want haxors to have 100% control ie all ur passwords plus stuff u never imagined, sure open it, optus offers great fitering but they cant filter them all.(but ur O/S is probly already compromised yer i know its sad hey but thats the net lol).

  2. Spam... Darren Moss - em3.com.au -- 25/01/06

    I don't believe introducing new anti-spam legislation is going to curb the use of email for unsolicited postings.

    We have found that there are many different types of hackers, with the two most common being:

    1) People who wish to promote something;
    2) People who wish to clutter mailboxes with crap that has no promotional value.

    Our customers are experiencing more of the latter - that is, people who are sending out useless information and don't have any product to sell.

    Another point is that by Australia introducing legislation against spammers is not going to have a real impact. What's needed is more legislation from larger regions like the US and China.

    In the US, California has announced anti-spam legislation where parties pretending to be someone else can be charged and fined.... that is if you can catch them ;)

    One things for sure, there will always be a role for anti-spam and virus management software.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Angus Kidman I'm a celebrity, don't back me up
    Celebrity comes with its perks — free alcohol, better-looking partners, lots of holiday time — and disadvantages — constant media intrusions, being forced to appear in films with Eddie Murphy for the long-term good of your career, and having to do mindless radio interviews with angry men who've been awake since 4am.
  • Array Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
    Earlier this month, Telstra put out a press release trumpeting that it's come up with a new phone coaching service to help people who are "bamboozled" by their mobiles. Another excellent example of wrongheaded thinking from the mobile industry.
  • Array Dear carriers: More walking, less talking
    Sometimes, a well-placed and well-timed letter can make all the difference. Other times, it can make no difference at all — and even hurt your case. This week's missive by the Competitive Carriers' Coalition, I would suggest, falls into the latter category.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured