Price must be right for fibre: Optus

With a battle ahead to build Australia's fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) infrastructure, Optus has warned the government that the new network should not come at too high a price.

The government's plan to mandate a FTTN network as a complement to its publicly funded WiMax scheme is gathering pace, with the recent announcement of the "expert panel" who will pick a winning bidder to install the fibre.

Despite its current coyness, Telstra is expected to put in a tender, as is the Optus-led G9 consortium. Warren Hardy, MD of Optus's consumer division, said the government must not let FTTN impact competition.

"The benefits of any upgrade must be weighed against the cost," he said today at the Australian Financial Review Broadband Australia conference.

"Telstra says we urgently need a fibre-to-the-node network .... but in return for building the network to half the population, Telstra wants to change the rules and lock out competition and charge whatever it likes," Hardy told the conference.

The Optus exec accused its rival of attempting to return to a state of monopoly in broadband services.

"Optus believes consumers are best served by the delivery of networks through open tenders not lawsuits or bully boy tactics -- it's far too important," Hardy said, a reference to Telstra's ongoing legal wrangling with the Communications Minister.

David Tudehope, CEO of Macquarie Telecom -- another G9 member -- echoed the sentiment that if Telstra were to win the bid, competition would suffer. "If Telstra were to be successful, it would be back to the future -- it would mean turning back the clock 15 years and it would be a very sad day for Australia."

The government recently released draft guidelines for would-be FTTN bidders, with final guidelines expected to be published several months later. Once a winning bid has been chosen, the government will legislate to enable the fibre network to be built.

David Kennedy, analyst at industry watchers Ovum, believes that the regulatory environment is not yet up to the job of dealing with broadband deployments.

"We put billions of dollars into roads and the system to do that works very smoothly and it should do ... Broadband, by comparison, has been around a very short time. The systems and institutions and structures needed to promote infrastructure in broadband are still very much in their infancy," he said.

Talkback 5 comments

    Our telecommunications and DSL costs Matt Embleton -- 21/08/07

    What Telstra charge us Australians for phone services and DSL services in Australia compared to other First World Nations we are a Joke. Telstra should be ashamed of them selves for being too greedy.

    Telecommunications costs are reasonable Anonymous -- 21/08/07 (in reply to #320084716)

    Remember that we don't live in a "first-world nation" like the USA, China, India or Germany. We live in a country where population density is lower, which necessitates significant amounts of investment on vital infrastructure in rural areas. If you have been to one of these "first world nations" you will note that many people are crammed into slums and apartment buildings, of course it's going to be cheaper to provide internet to people in these dense settlements. If we want to maintain our proper Australian way of life with a nice big house, a large backyard and a beautiful Holden Commodore in the driveway we may need to sacrifice a little bit in terms of paying more for internet. Big deal, the Commodore and the McMansions are worth it!

    Telecommunications costs are NOT reasonable Anonymous -- 21/08/07 (in reply to #320084732)

    Between the years 2000 and 2005 the Telstra monopoly increased its line rental charges by over 174% or the equivalent of 30.3% pa. How is that reasonable?

    Even chairman McGauchie admitted at the 2006 Telstra AGM that they'd got too greedy.

    Telecommunications costs reasonable? Anonymous -- 21/08/07 (in reply to #320084732)

    It's significant that the Telstra advocate makes no mention of Canada or NZ - both countries with a scattered low density population. Both countries have significant topographical barriers as compared to Australia, yet both countries have cheaper, faster and more efficient telecommunications.

    New Zealand and Canada Anonymous -- 22/08/07 (in reply to #320084749)

    both NZ and Canada have one common trait - a much higher per capita Chinese population than Australia - both hovering around the 4-5% mark rather than Australia's paltry 2.9%. Once we get a few more highly educated immigrants and Hong Kong entrepeneurs into this country things should improve in terms of telecommunications test...

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Brad Howarth The key Topik is always money
    One of the big problems of the internet is that is practically impossible to keep up-to-date on preferred topics. You can limit your sources, but this can mean missing a lot of valuable data.
  • Array Google open-sources JavaScript tools
    Google announced overnight the release and open-sourcing of a trio of tools designed to help JavaScript developers.
  • Array Do we need the legislative blackmail?
    Virtually everyone in the telecommunications industry has their say in the Senate Standing Committee's public hearing into the pending legislation to split up Telstra, in this week's Twisted Wire podcast.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured