Pocket PC vs. Palm: Battle of the PDAs

By Dave Grober and Mike Hurley
21 December 2000 11:13 AM
Tags: browser, handheld, palm, pda, download, pocket pc, mike, dave

PDAs are PIMs afterall

Dave:
Chocolate sundae, indeed. For most of us, traveling with a Pocket PC is like ordering a seven-course meal to go when all we need is a snack.

Besides, on my Palm, I can do all this:

  • View and edit Word and Excel files
  • Link to Money or Quicken
  • Send messages to pagers and digital phones
  • Heck, send voice messages to any telephone
  • Play .WAV sounds
  • Save and view photographs
  • Create animations and morphs
  • Watch videos and Webcams
  • Track my position with GPS
  • Control my TV, VCR and more
  • Play the piano
  • Make my Palm look like a PC (yikes!)
  • And yes, Mike, browse the Web

I can, but I usually don't. And I suspect that most folks -- like me -- won't be doing most of these things most of their time on the run. Still, it's nice to have the enabling software a click away and free to try. It's also nice to know that I can expand my modest digital companion with a host of cool hardware accessories: keyboards, MP3 players, digital cameras, modems, phones, GPS receivers and more.

But play DOOM on a PocketPC? Do you also kick back and watch Titanic on your handheld television? Thanks, but no thanks. For the Palm, I can recommend a solid selection of games that were actually designed for the small screen, terrific diversions and amusements when you're stuck in the mall return line or trapped in an endless meeting.

Hey, Mike -- PDAs make great PIMs. For everything else: Get a laptop. Get a Gameboy. Get a life.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    It really does not matter whic ...Anonymous -- 19/09/02

    It really does not matter which device one chooses to use. They both provide the basic functionality needed from a PDA. If one wants to spend the extra cash, the Pocket PC does offer more power and it does run a version of Windows (yikes!), but the palm is cheaper and fufills more than all the needs of the normal user. The only real reason that the Pocket PCs are dosing as well as they are is the Monopoly known as Microsoft. If they ran a proprietary OS like the Palm does, no one would pay the price for them. For the user who is money wise and wishes to use the real industry standards and not the unilateral dominating standards of Microsoft, the palm is the choice. The Pocket PC is for the user who does not mind endorsing an oppressive company in order to get a few more whistles and bells that few others are cmopatable with anyways.

    Gothmog, lord of balrogs, high capitan of Angband, was come...

    Pocket Pc is Pocket **** Sorr ...Anonymous -- 14/06/04

    Pocket Pc is Pocket ****

    Sorry about the vulgar language, but it is!

    Microsoft tried to make their OS for PDA's too much like their OS for desktop.
    The result?
    Too much screen space is used by crap, too much memory is used by crap, too much money is used by crap.
    In short, the result is similar to putting a ferrari engine into a bus.

    By that I mean that Microsoft Windows is ok for desktops, where you have the screen space, have the memory, and usually have the money. Heck, I'm typing this off Microsoft Internet Explorer.

    But when you try to put that into something that has, at best an eight of the screen space, and 250th of the memory of your average desktop, it is no good. This article must be somewheat outdated I realise, becuase you talk of monochrome screens. Palm has caught up with the new Tungsten range, which can match and beat the performance of any Pocket PC anyday.

    Sorry, but PalmOne and PalmSource are the way to go.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie A guide to the future of the internet
    Last week we looked at the history of the internet in Australia. It's been around for 20 years and changed our lives in so many ways. Imagine what it could do given another 20 years.
  • Array Carelessness busts Linux security
    No operating system can ever properly protect a computer from trojans as long as users continue to do silly things. Just because Linux is immune to your standard drive-by viruses it does not mean that it can escape trojan horses.
  • Array Sun shining on Ajnaware
    Graham Dawson talks about the future of iPhone app development and augmented reality.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured