Optus taking on Telstra with 42Mbps 3G network

Today Optus announced plans to expand its 3G network coverage next year to 98 percent of Australia and will bring mobile speeds up to 42Mbps by 2010, in a direct challenge to rival Telstra.

The telco is embarking on an investment program to expand its coverage from 96 percent of Australia's population to 98 percent by December 2009, in an upgrade which will cost the company AU$315 million.

Optus CEO Paul O'Sullivan

As part of the upgrade it will also be upping bandwidth across the network to 28Mbps from late 2009, with the aim of working with "strategic partners" to increase that speed to 42Mbps by the end of 2010, according to CEO Paul O'Sullivan.

"With this significant expansion we will be the only mobile carrier capable of challenging [Telstra's] network reach," he said in a statement.

It's expected that Telstra will beat Optus in establishing 42Mbps speeds after the national carrier announced in February that it plans to have the Next G network running at that speed by the end of 2009.

Telecommunications industry analyst and BuddeComm CEO Paul Budde told ZDNet.com.au that Optus's plans to extend the reach and power of the network were "critical" for competition in regional Australia.

"Telstra is in a very comfortable situation at the moment ... it's always going to be difficult for a competitor to come in and break a market with so many people on 12- or 24-month contracts, but this is going to be an important boost for competition in general and specifically in regional Australia," he said.

Mobile services analyst at research firm IDC, Waqas Javed, believes that the announcement and ensuing network expansion will have "no effect" on Telstra as it has "already launched their 3G services and they are also constantly increasing their subscriber base".

"By the time Optus and Vodafone's 3G services are launched, Telstra would have already captured the major subscriber market share," he said.

However, analyst Paul Budde believes that the role of next-generation handheld devices is not to be underestimated.

"In the end they're all similar networks ... but with products like the iPhone people will start moving away from their basic voice service, which will push mobile competition in other areas," he said.

"The real problem for the operators is that they don't want to cannibalise their highly lucrative voice businesses, so the telcos will want to drag this sort of thing on in order to protect revenue from that," said Budde.

HSDPA using 900MHz spectrum will be utilised to expand Optus's coverage over an additional 400,000 square kilometres, after it announced late last year its intentions to switch on HSDPA in some areas by the end of 2008.

Optus will also join Vodafone in a planned speed bump. The operator announced recently it will soon be ready to take its network to 28.8Mbps.

Advertisement

Talkback 18 comments

    Oh dear...Lord Watchdog -- 07/05/08

    What claims of unfair play will come from big mouth Phil over this?

    Optus Invest?? Must be a Joke!!!jo -- 07/05/08

    You mean like running off to the ACCC and always whingeing like Optus does!!!!

    Wait and seeArthur -- 07/05/08

    Another great announcement by Droptus, I look forward to them reaching 60% HSDPA coverage at 3.6Mbps let alone 98% and 42Mbps. I doubt you will hear complaints that there are no devices available for those speeds from the constant complainers on this site unlike when Telstra launched 14.4Mbps last year or as I expect in a few months when they break the 20Mbps barrier or next year when they exceed 40Mbps. I notice the first comment was to bag Telstra by the lord of bagging Telstra himself.

    A tiny **** in the armourSWalker -- 07/05/08

    I agree with Waqaz Javed, Optus is playing follow-the-leader again. Telstra not only already have the NextG network but more importantly they were quick to realise that they needed to offer compelling services, something which Optus doesn't seem to grasp.

    Optus will never out-invest Telstra, but it would be nice if they at least out-innovated.
    mobileaus.blogspot.com

    Dream on.Sydney Lawrence -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101255)

    December 2009? Imagine where Telstra will be by then.

    Yes, just imagineLord Watchdog -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101269)

    From a customer's perspective the best product is the best value for money, not necessarily the greatest possible performance or the least possible expense or what a company or a company's shareholders deems to be a 'premium product' - terminology that Telstra, and other companies, often use to justify a brick price for a sticks and straw product.

    The truth comes outJames Bell -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101255)

    SWalker & Arthur,

    Don't ever forget that Telstra had a headstart in the coverage race and they have the previous government to thank for it.

    What on earth is it with the Telstra cheerleaders who post here?? First you whinge that Optus should invest more, even though on a size for size comparison they're 7 to 8 times SMALLER, and then when they announce extending their coverage to meet that of NextG without a single dollar of government assistance (unlike Telstra) you still whinge?? I think many of the negative comments here show your true colours and where your heads are at. You don't want competition in any capacity and just want a return on your T2 investments.

    Congratulations to Optus for putting in the capital and also for welcoming wholesale access to the network. Even NextG customers stand to benefit as this is without any doubt going to bring your prices down as well!

    Fair DuesSWalker -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101274)

    James,
    Of course you're right, Telstra has always had a headstart and Optus should indeed be praised for making an investment of this size.
    Read my comments though, I never criticised Optus' investment (in fact, I think its positive all round), nor congratulated Telstra on simply rolling-out a network. My issue is that Telstra has innovated with services, Optus has not.

    Again I'll say that Optus will never out-invest Telstra, but for a smaller, more agile competitor they should be taking it to Telstra with innovation, not just replication.

    Too trueBeanie -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101283)

    Optus has always been a "me too" discounter. I wouldn't expect any innovation to come from them.

    Three, however, had 3G years before Telstra. A little too early perhaps and I think that if their casual prices for various services were close to reasonable (e.g. $18 to look up one phone number in yellowpages.com on casual broadband rates is not!) then people might be more willing to give them a try.

    Personally I would rather see innovations in more frivolous things such as, oh, range (I live 7km from centre of Brisbane and am lucky to get 1 bar from Telstra). But I guess these companies are more interested in trying to peddle useless rubbish like mobile TV (obviously after the monumental success of handheld TVs in the 80s/90s - remember those - no??) .

    previous government to thank for that?Arthur -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101274)

    Is this the same government that was doing everything they could to drive them into the ground, and handing money out in secret back room (a.k.a. Opel) deals. If Telstra could get a 3 year head start on their competitors in this environment then just imagine what they could do with a fair and balanced government in power. No wonder you are becoming more and more vocal, you are scared that your ambition to destroy Telstra will ultimately fail. You talk about T2 investments and make claims you are s simple consumer who would like lower charges. Is it not true that you have a vested financial interest in the industry and you actions are driven by the desire to increase the lining in your own pocket. I am happy to publish your e-mail address, phone number and industry interests if you wish.

    My ambition to destroy Telstra through a blogJames Bell -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101284)

    Arthur let's remember that while you can falsely claim all you like that the Broadband Connect tender was a "secret back room deal" if we look at today's announcement what we will have are two competing 3G networks with a comparable coverage reach. One was built utilising the backhaul and base station sites of a government funded network, and the other will be built without a single iota of assistance. This is all well and good and at the end of the day it doesn't really matter now if Telstra did receive assistance, but when people are highly critical of another company for supposedly not investing and then critical again when the same company makes a significant investment announcement one has to question their motifs.

    I'm scared that my "ambition to destroy Telstra will ultimately fail"? Where on earth did you come to that conclusion because if that were my intention I'm sure there'd be better ways to attempt that than posting here. I have no problem admitting that my interests (as with most Australians) is in my hip pocket and don't pretend to be holier than thou; however unlike shareholders my interests sit in an area to benefit the majority of Australians through the value of services we receive as consumers. I don't want to see "Telstra ultimately fail" as you claim because as a company they too are an integral part of the competition formula this country needs. I'm also aware they employ a very large workforce and yes there are many shareholders too, so to accuse me of wanting a large corporation's demise is just plain wrong. What I am against however are the dirty tactics employed by Sol & his Director of Spin Dr Phil. I don't doubt for one moment that they're both very intelligent, but the contempt they have shown for the Australian people through their truth bending, hostile lobbying and a "sue at all costs" attitude does in fact scare me. I genuinely believe through their leadership and extraordinarily aggressive behaviour that they are damaging the brand for their own short term gains.

    History never repeats ... until nowArthur -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101301)

    James you were saying the same thing about Ziggy, Frank and others. It is not the CEO, the country they came from, the quality of the toilet paper they used or the car they drove. It is simply you and your blind hatred towards a great Australian company.

    Data charges and 42mbit/sAnonymous -- 08/05/08

    Unless the providers create some significantly improved ways of monitoring your bandwidth usage, I would like to question the sanity of a 42mbit p/s mobile connection, i.e. something that'd let you rack up $10k worth of debt in a few hours or $100ks in days if something went wrong with the device.

    Just picture that your phone got hacked, an app had a bug, or any other cause of continous transmission... Gone haywire it could completely wreck someone's foreseeable future.

    Having said that I love the fact that Tel$tra is getting some serious competition in the market.

    The cost is the issue - not the speedM@TT -- 08/05/08

    Just compare adsl/cable data costs against wireless - the differential is enormous - and at this time - not sustainable by anyone but corporate customers who write it off on tax.

    The ridiculous data limit caps combined with the outrageous costs of additonal data (and notive that they do not offer speed limiting when data usage is exceeded) are just containing the takeup and usage.

    T & O need to lift their game

    This is called supply and demandAnonymous -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101285)

    The first company to offer a high demand service to the masses will always have the ability to charge what they wanted. Just look at cars, computers and air travel, once these became more readily available via mass production prices & competition went down. I am sure once there is real competition to the Next G speed and coverage the high margins will reduce but until then we will all have to live with perceived higher prices or no service at all.

    Two's company three's a crowd.Sydney Lawrence -- 08/05/08

    How would the combatants on CDNet feel if the current rumour that Telstra and G9 may team up on the NBN roll-out is a fact.

    This idea while not impossible would certainly require some hard bargaining and some repositioning of finance and division of assets.

    While this would be difficult it would guarantee the duopoly the Australian market into the foreseeable future and stabilise the industry.

    Another big advantage is it would finish the need for interference from the ACCC and finish forever the need for regulation which really should be left to the free market system.

    Old news is bad newsLord Watchdog -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101308)

    The trouble with this is that the G9 has been trying to get Telstra on board and involve them. They not only threw out the welcome mat to Sol but offered to wash the mud off his shoes too.

    Telstra refused at every step and has always wanted to go it alone so they can roll out their network at their own pace and charge whatever they liked.

    Telstra's preference will no doubt make you a rich man Sydney but it won't provide potential customers with a fair deal.

    Old comments are boring commentsArthur -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101317)

    Lord, why do you keep repeating the same old lines. The world knows that Telstra will rather invest their own money (yes I opened the door for you to make a stupid comment) on new infrastructure ventures then partner with their arch rivals.

    That is like me offering you a glass of wine when we all know you don't drink the stuff. By you saying no thank you does that make you a bad person?

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett PayPal launches Aussie developer program
    PayPal announced the opening of its certification program for Australian developers today, making Australia the first country outside of the US to offer certification.
  • Array Cash cow in a BigTinCan?
    Around one third of Australia's telcos have shut their doors over time, but that isn't stopping new ventures hoping to chip away at carriers' mobile call bonanza. By fighting carriers at the smartphone rather than the home phone, could the latest two contenders be onto something big?
  • Array A third of the way to a zettabyte
    This week on Twisted Wire we look at how internet usage is changing in Australia and around the world. How are we meeting this demand and how is the cost structure changing for the service provider?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured