NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Optus still wants Telstra split up

The nation's number two telco Optus said today it still wanted Telstra's wholesale and retail arms separated from each other, and hadn't noticed any change in the company's stance towards its rivals in recent times.

The comments came as Optus general manager of regulatory affairs Andrew Sheridan briefed ZDNet.com.au on his company's response to the Federal Government's review into industry regulatory changes, which could accompany the $43 billion National Broadband Network project.

Sheridan noted that Telstra's approach had not changed in recent times, despite its appointing what many have seen as a more conciliatory chief executive, David Thodey and chairman, Catherine Livingstone. The Optus executive particularly noted Telstra's move last week to appeal an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) ruling on unbundled local loop pricing.

Optus' preferred view of Telstra's future (at this stage) would see the telco split into two separate companies, one to own and operate Telstra's network and sell wholesale services to other telcos, and one to sell retail services. Shareholders would exchange their Telstra shares for equivalent shares in each company.

Another option would see Telstra simply setting up a separate unit within its own operations to deal with the network and wholesale side of its business. Sheridan noted the government was already planning to implement a wholesale-only model for its planned National Broadband Network company, and claimed that implementing a similar model across the industry prior to the NBN's establishment would benefit the industry.

The other planks of Optus' regulatory submission will focus on forcing Telstra to provide access to services to rivals on "truly equal" terms as it does its own retail businesses, new pricing rules for wholesale services and stronger powers for the ACCC.

In general, Sheridan said Optus' submission was designed to obviate what he described as the "market failure" of the current regulatory regime, due to what he claimed was an overly dominant position by Telstra by virtue of its vertically integrated structure.

The problem mainly applied to the fixed-line sphere, Sheridan said, with the mobile sphere having found more success with fuller infrastructure-based competition since the telecommunications industry was de-regulated in 1997. "If the policy-makers were still around 12 years on, I doubt they would say their policies were successful," he said.

Advertisement

Talkback 9 comments

    easy Anonymous -- 19/05/09

    i guess that's the easy way to go from number two to number one.

    Optus stillwants telstra split Anonymous -- 20/05/09

    Oh, of course they want Telstra to split so they can be a monopoly for a while. Boo Hoo

    If it wasnt bad enough that Telstra was Forced to give them Technical assistance to get established
    now they wont stop whinging.

    Heres a suggestion OPTUS, Lookafetr your own problems you have enough of them and shut up.

    And Customers Steve -- 20/05/09 (in reply to #320136901)

    And dont forget Telstra was also forced to supply thier initial customers.

    Optus - Singtel Anonymous -- 20/05/09

    Why not?

    The Australian government didnt want to run Telstra so why not let the Singapore Government and their spawn run our telecommunications here ? deregulated means a separation of retail and wholesale - get on with it!

    RE Singtel/OPTUS Anonymous -- 22/05/09

    Yeah!! Lets see how ths Singaporeans go at running Australia's new shiny NBN!!

    I hear they're very "active" in Canberra circles!!

    Can SINGTEL be trusted? Anonymous -- 25/05/09

    I hear they're very "active" in Canberra circles!! Particularly where secrets are involved!

    Can they be entrusted with the NBN. Their Joke "Tierra" proposal should be enough for most Aussie punters to draw a conclusion as to where their interests lie!

    Certainly not Australia's . One might say Singapore's interest!!!

    now now Anonymous -- 25/05/09 (in reply to #320137989)

    now now sydney.

    @ The above SingTel comments... Simon -- 04/06/09 (in reply to #320137989)

    Hey look Sol was right after all. We are racist.

    Well Telstra supporters are Singapore racist anyway, and Sol ought to know!

    .. Anonymous -- 25/05/09

    The fact of the matter is, Telstra charge exuberant prices and always have. If it wasn't for the deregulation of the telecom. market then we would still be paying high prices for abysmal services. If Telstra's wholesale and retail were split, we would undoubtedly see more competitive pricing and more appealing offers from Telstra. As it stands, customer service and satisfaction isn't number one to Telstra because they have the monopoly of the wholesale market. The only reason Optus would move to number one is because they offer a more appealing service then Telstra. Simple.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured