Optus could cut 400 jobs

By Liam Tung, ZDNet.com.au
20 October 2008 10:41 AM
Tags: job, losses, optus, redundancy, telco, bigpond, isp, telstra
AAP

Optus will reportedly slash hundreds of jobs this week to counter the effects of a likely economic downturn.

Around 400 jobs are set to go from Optus' Sydney office, according to a report published by Fairfax newspapers today.

Optus would not confirm or deny the job cuts; however, a spokesperson told ZDNet.com.au that the article was "speculative". "We have not announced 400 job redundancies," they said. Optus is likely to make further announcements throughout the week. If true, the 400 redundancies would represent 6 per cent of Optus' 6,000 head count.

Optus informed the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union (CEPU) earlier today of the planned cuts, assistant national secretary Bert Blackburn said.

"They're going to be talking to the staff today, and they're saying to us ... a significant number of employees will be going," Blackburn told AAP.

The majority of cuts will come in middle and senior management roles in Sydney, plus a handful of positions in Brisbane and Melbourne, he said. "Most will finish up about November 2008, so we're pretty unhappy about that. Even if not all of them are our members its not a good time to be put out on the grass."

Blackburn said Optus had informed the union the number of job cuts would be less than the 400 reported today by Fairfax newspapers.

Cuts at Optus would follow similar moves made by Telstra in September. The telco announced 800 redundancies as it merged its internet service provider arm BigPond with several other divisions to create Telstra Media.

Telstra's cuts primarily targeted support and management roles in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.



© 2008 Australian Associated Press Pty Limited (AAP) or its Licensors. This is the ZDNet Australia TM service with content provided by AAP. AAP reserves all rights, including copyright, in services provided by it. The information, text and images in the service are for personal use only and may not be re-written, copied, re-sold or re-distributed, framed, linked or otherwise used whether for compensation of any kind or not, without the prior written permission of AAP.
This service is published for information only without assuming a duty of care. AAP is not in the business of providing professional advice, and gives no warranty, guarantee or other representation about the accuracy of the information or images contained in this service. AAP is not liable for errors, omissions in, delays or interruptions to or cessation of the services through negligence or otherwise.
The globe symbol and "AAP" are registered trade marks.
Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    Roll on the good times. Sydney Lawrence -- 20/10/08

    I expected the torrent of abuse and horror that would have accompanied a Telstra retrenchment statement to be visible from the Anti Telstra Brigade. I wait and watch.

    The Sydney Morning Herald reported that of the the 700 companies in competition with Telstra in Australia few make a profit. The call by the anti Telstra group for Telstra to lower charges would result in the annihilation of most of the 700 so the call for Telstra to be more competitive puzzles me.

    blah blah blah Terry -- 20/10/08 (in reply to #320114530)

    "I expected the torrent of abuse and horror that would have accompanied a Telstra retrenchment statement to be visible from the Anti Telstra Brigade. I wait and watch."

    Companies are laying off staff everywhere, including your precious Telstra only a few weeks ago when 800 left after Bigpond was merged. Considering the overall small number of the layoffs (115) compared to the number employed at Optus it's not really something to start jumping up and down too much about, unless of course further layoffs keep happening.

    In reality it looks more like a restructuring to merge departments (see what Telstra did with Bigpond) to cut away the dead weight and make the whole system run more efficiently.

    "The Sydney Morning Herald reported that of the the 700 companies in competition with Telstra in Australia few make a profit. The call by the anti Telstra group for Telstra to lower charges would result in the annihilation of most of the 700 so the call for Telstra to be more competitive puzzles me."

    Which has what exactly to do with Optus laying off staff?

    I'm alright Jack. Sydney Lawrence -- 21/10/08 (in reply to #320114549)

    Terry what a heartless and greedy person you must be. "115 layoffs not really something to start jumping up and down too much about".

    No I suppose not Terry as long as you are not one of them. And Terry the greedy part was my supposition that you probably have an interest in the industry and these layoffs advantage you.

    My remarks concerning the vulnerability of the Telstra 700 opponents should Telstra apply additional competition was the possibility of more and larger number of layoffs from the referred to 700 as the Telstra price-cuts apply.

    At least Telstra jobs stay here. Paul -- 21/10/08 (in reply to #320114562)

    I know from when I worked at Optus that when they fire people here, they put the workers back on in india because its cheaper.

    So its a double blow, the jobs go, and theyre never coming back.

    @I'm alright Jack. Terry -- 21/10/08 (in reply to #320114562)

    "Terry what a heartless and greedy person you must be. "115 layoffs not really something to start jumping up and down too much about".

    No I suppose not Terry as long as you are not one of them. And Terry the greedy part was my supposition that you probably have an interest in the industry and these layoffs advantage you."

    I'm not really sure how layoffs in any industry help anyone. And my point that 115 wasn't many was simply that layoffs were going to happen, the economic downturn is going to force that, but 115 being laid off is better than 1000-2000 or more.

    I didn't jump up and down when Telstra laid off 800 due to the Bigpond merger, it was a low number of staff compared to what could have been potentially laid off. Just as in this case 115 is a low number compared to what could have been laid off had these small (by comparison) cuts not been made now.

    "My remarks concerning the vulnerability of the Telstra 700 opponents should Telstra apply additional competition was the possibility of more and larger number of layoffs from the referred to 700 as the Telstra price-cuts apply"

    So absolutely nothing specifically to do with Optus cutting staff?

    OPTUS Staff Cuts - Here's Why! Anonymous -- 21/10/08

    This need to go to
    edno@nat.cepu.asn.au

    Len I refer you to the article below by Mitchell Bingemann in which Optus tries to cover up yesterday’s sackings as being related to the recent network failures. What is clear is that most staff in yesterday’s sackings by the Networks Division were in no way associated with the recent failures. The staff sacked, were front line managers & staff who mostly had no relationship to the failures but were seen as not fitting in thus dispensable in cover up of a massive budget blow out by the incumbent directors who through years of boys club management had ultimately caused the failures. This cover up by the directors has been achievable through the naivety of the newly appointed Singaporean MD who had the same directors run the review into their own inadequacies. What has really blown people up is the absolute lack of integrity by this team of directors who are not being held accountable and their actions in running this charade.

    For your information below is an email sent by an effected friend who is Singaporean on this matter to Singapore.

    As you would be aware it is very prudent at this stage that all involved should remain anonymous, however one could say Optus is really starting to get a collection of ex-staff who really want for them to fail in the fibre bid. (Go Telstra)

    Skip

    BTW, below was also sent to The Australian and The Singapore Straits Times

    To: mah_bow_tan@mnd.gov.sg
    Sent: Tue Oct 21 8:30
    Subject: Fwd: Hi...

    Hi David,

    I trust you and the family are well in Singapore. My regards to Sheryn and the kids. I am well in Australia (still in Sydney) but am somewhat saddened by the story below as I have very good friends who've been put out of work at a time of the global financial crisis. This has put them and their families under undue financial and emotional stress. However what has really upset me and my friends is the attempt to bury the actions of the staff cuts as some form of efficiency gain due to a number of recent network failures in the article below.

    On very good advice from within OPTUS, Mr Tay who only recently moved into the position as Managing Director of Networks appears to have been misled and misguided in his actions by his current leadership team who mostly oversaw decisions in the recent past that directly related to the reasons for the networks failures cited in the article below.

    The three directors who have had prime responsibility for Network provisioning and assurance for the last four years are Peter Sutherland, John King and Nole Jerard, all of whom have been retained in their current or near roles although front line managers and staff who had no direct or indirect relationship with the failures have been dismissed.

    Reports from inside OPTUS also bring into question Mr Tay's leadership when his leadership team allowed a general manager, Darren Mills, who had already resigned to go to a management role in oppostition Telstra Australia to be retained within OPTUS, on the guise that he had already been walked by OPTUS, to effectively participate in orchestrating these staff cuts.

    The actions of Mr Tay in not bringing into account his leadership team for their failure casts serious doubts about his own character when it was also mentioned that the main reason for these staff cuts was to coverup a $3 million overspend by the leadership team under their previous managing director

    What is extremely disturbing about this rort of activities by senior management in SingTel and OPTUS appears to repeat the very same rort in the recent spate of financial institution failures and it has created considerable animosity amongst telecommunication technical staff across Australia toward OPTUS and its organisation ethics. To demonstrate I append a recent blog in the Sydney Morning Herald...

    "And you think Optus/Virgin customers are being screwed... you would not believe what Optus is doing to its engineers.

    Skip? Simon -- 22/10/08 (in reply to #320114591)

    If what you say is true, then I hope the rot is exposed and expunged quickly!
    Sadly, incompetent and corrupt senior management seems to be rife in this country. Cronyism, junkets and abuse of power seems to be right of passage for C level and above. There's little that employees can do, pointless to bring to anyone's attention as it will simply get you fired and wreck any chance of an ongoing career. You see these incompetent (or corrupt) management (directors) pop up time and again - if caught out, they get paid out big time and hey presto, turn up in some other happless organisation as CIO, CEO or Director.
    Why is this tolerated?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured