NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Optus: NBN deal makes 'absolute sense'

Optus has thrown its weight fully behind the government's decision to change the goal posts of its National Broadband Network to fibre-to-the-home technology and to form a new majority government-owned entity to build it.

Maha Krishnapillai
(Credit: Slattery IT)

Optus director of government and corporate affairs, Maha Krishnapillai, said that Optus was absolutely supportive of the announcement this morning. It would create a level playing field for all providers to compete from, initiating "root and branch reform".

The decision to provide fibre-to-the-home to 90 per cent of the population instead of fibre-to-the-node to 98 per cent was also a wise decision, he believed, eliminating Telstra's ability to frustrate the process.

It had taken a while for the government to reach a decision on the NBN and associated regulatory reforms, but Labor had decided not to go with a policy made using information it had obtained while in opposition, Krishnapillai said. "That's a smart decision," he said.

The government's discussion paper on regulatory issues up until the network could be built was a gem, according to Krishnapillai. "It picks up on all of the things and more that we've been arguing for in terms of regulatory reform."

He guaranteed that Optus would be responding to the paper. "We'll be saying that we love it and we want you to do everything," he said.

When asked whether the company felt out of pocket as TransACT had when the government announced that no bidders had been found satisfactory, Krishnapillai said "No Way!" He said even that in hindsight, it was better that the OPEL network had not gone ahead, as the new plan would mean a much more cohesive broadband plan for the nation.

Krishnapillai admitted that "the devil [was] in the detail" about the plan, saying that its success would depend on what came out of the Senate in terms of regulatory reform, how the industry assisted and which vendors would be chosen.

Other players in the industry have also approved.

"This is the best of all possible outcomes and will ensure Australians have access to fast, affordable and competitive broadband," iiNet managing director Michael Malone said in a statement, with the government meeting all the key criteria industry was looking for in a National Broadband Network: open access, structural separation, fixing backhaul blackspots and regulatory reform.

Internode managing director Simon Hackett wrote on Whirlpool that it would be 10 years until the network would be up and running, but praised the project for avoiding the copper network which would meant that investments already made by players could continue to run.

"I'm gobsmacked. If they do what they promise, they've actually got it right, and we might just turn into a broadband front-runner country 10 years from now ... after all," he said.

"This has the potential to be the most significant change this industry has seen since deregulation in 1997. And just as deregulation kick-started competition, today's announcements have the right ingredients to set a solid foundation for a truly competitive 21st century telecommunications industry," Macquarie Telecom national executive regulatory and government Matt Healy said in a statement.

"Once implemented, if the result of the market reforms announced today does nothing more than bring Australian prices into line with OECD averages, the result will be dramatic," David Forman, executive director Competitive Carrier's Coalition said in a statement. He believed small and medium-sized businesses could expect price cuts of 40 per cent.

"We congratulate [Communications Minister Stephen] Conroy and the government on making such a far-sighted decision on industry reform in a way that no government had previously been willing to do," Forman said.

Advertisement

Talkback 24 comments

    David Forman, executive director Competitive Carrier's Coalition Anonymous -- 07/04/09

    We should note here that David Forman's wife is Labor Senator Kate Lundy.

    What a stupid comment fairy godmother -- 08/04/09 (in reply to #320128684)

    The title of the subject says it all. First of all, everyone already knows they're married, she makes a point of stating it WHENEVER it's appropriate. And second of all who cares.

    WHO CARES???? EVERY AUSTRALIAN. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320128890)

    Who cares, are you joking.

    This would have the greatest conflict of interest in the history of business.

    Senator Lundy should excuse herself from any and every NBN decision.

    'True Competition' Anonymous -- 07/04/09

    Just watched Maha on Sky tv. When asked by the interviewer as to whether SINGTEL/OPTUS would invest in the industry for a changed he ducked and weaved with the best of them & no straight answer was forth coming.

    On the other hand Telstra has always said it was ready to invest providing regulatuion is pro investment

    should be noted? Anonymous -- 07/04/09

    Yep it should be noted in the same way as Sol Trujillo's relationship with the former dictator of the Dominican Republic Rafael Leonidas Trujillo.

    ha ha! Anonymous -- 07/04/09 (in reply to #320128720)

    This story makes me laugh so much... Telstra has been well and truly shafted. Optus never wanted this any way and it's submission was purely to frustrate and out-manoevre Telstra. Great outcome. ...

    Suspect mirth. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320128760)

    That ha ha sounds a little diabolical and forced.

    Visionary JC -- 08/04/09

    If the government actually overcomes the opposition to this and pushes it through, I believe that in 20 years this network will be as important to Australia as the road network, the railways and the ports. We can only imagine what the network will be used for at this time, just like Jedlik could only imagine what the electric motor would be used for when he invented it. Things that spring to mind now are distance education and remote surgery, but this will only be the beginning. Thank goodness that the politicians have listened to the experts!

    Optus does not care about cost Anonymous -- 08/04/09

    Has anyone calculated the cost. It is more than $2000 per Australia or more than $8000 per family. We have to borrow the money and tax payers need to repay them with interests. How can we do that? Has gov done any financial feasibility study, or did they have time to do it at all?

    Of course Optus will support it, it does not cost them a cent and may pick a bargain a few years later.

    cost... Rob Demon -- 08/04/09 (in reply to #320128824)

    yeah someone has calculated - you! And me too now. Its alot isn't it, but then again roads and other infrastructure are expensive too. And think of the savings on roads, public transport, etc if no-one needs to leave home any more since the internet is so good!

    Telstra does not care about cost Anonymous -- 08/04/09 (in reply to #320128824)

    So how has Telstra had to pay for their monopolistic takeover, use and hostage of the current copper network? They were basically given it, and not rent it out at astronomical rates to anyone else who wants access, even though it was laid down by far sighted governments in times past for (possibly) well over the projected $2000/person figure the fibre network may cost. Telstra just took ownership of it, and even though they are still majority public owned, whored it out to make as much $$ as possible for themselves while stifling everyone else.

    Wll said. Anonymous -- 08/04/09 (in reply to #320128843)

    Exactly. Current business managers are experts in profiteering only. The useless twerps at Telstra deserve to have real competition built without the horrendous markup that private infrastructure requires.
    Enough paying through the nose for last centuries tech.

    thanks Phil Burgess Anonymous -- 08/04/09 (in reply to #320128868)

    I totally agree. Sick of paying Telstra a lot of money for a service that's on a par with sub-saharan Africa. Telstra has been allowed to milk its advantage for too long and now it's great to see it sweat. So much for the ultra-expensive American management. Operationally, they have done some impressive things. At a more strategic, regulatory level old bigmouth played his cards wrong and has consequently resigned Telstra to a whole heap of trouble. It's good to see....

    Telstra does not care about cost Anonymous -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320128843)

    What do you mean by "They were basically given it, and not rent it out at astronomical rates to anyone else who wants access etc.,......"

    The shareholders of Telstra paid for it, you dork, so why wouldn't they want Telstra to run at a profit. Your comment " whored it out to make as much $$ as possible", indicates how low your level of intelligence is, so who cares what your opinion is.

    This could be you. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320128843)

    I advise all children to read this "Telstra does not care about cost" rave and understand that without education this is the garbage that can be expected from the uneducated. Do your schooling kids, without it, this could be you.

    Understand. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129074)

    Be certain my reply above was not for #320128843 and was directed at the retard 320128824.

    Forget it, you know what I mean. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129076)

    Forget the numbers just get the picture. TELSTRA RULE!

    We know Mel Sommersberg -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129079)

    That is the whole problem Sydney, they do - Labor is too chicken to bring them to heel and they let Telstra walk all over them and us.

    Do the sums Mel. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129086)

    Mel seriously, what do you think of the idea that Telstra co-operate totally with the Government, roll-out the fibre through their (Telstra's) conduit, supply all information necessary and inject capital as required. Also, separate their divisions to allow competition, all to the satisfaction of the Government and the ACCC and when the project is running transfer all customers to the new network. At this point Telstra will own the network, Australia will have the worlds best NBN and the Rudd Government will be returned at every election for the next three terms.

    re Do the sums Mel. Not Mel &Definitely not Jason -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129106)

    Sounds like a pretty good idea to me. So there is obviously no way that it would ever be considered.

    Good one Not Mel or Jason Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129120)

    Excellent reply full of truth and very, very funny. Made my day.

    Two faced Anonymous -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129106)

    Telstra have always refused partnerships, when they had the upper hand, now they don't hold the trump card, they can't wait for a partnership! Two faced hypocrites.

    Smell the fear. Sydney Lawrence -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129136)

    This result frighten you then Two faced?

    Fear? Anonymous -- 09/04/09 (in reply to #320129139)

    Telstra are right not to want a partnership, hey Syd.

    Oh wait, Telstra have changed their minds and now they want a partnership, and they are again right, hey Syd

    Tell me then, when Telstra say one thing, then later say the opposite, how can they always be right?

    But just what does this have to do with fear? Are they charging $500 per month for a premium scary movie now?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue All I want for Xmas is Telstra pricing
    Five consecutive days without broadband has led me to what seemed at the time to be an act of desperation: contemplating signing up for Telstra's 100Mbps cable modem service.
  • Array Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured