NZ leads the broadband race?

Is New Zealand getting ahead of Australia in terms of broadband coverage?

Telecom New Zealand chief executive Theresa Gattung said today that two recently published reports from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) "showed the big advances that New Zealand has made in reducing prices and getting coverage to rural areas."

"The OECD rates Telecom the sixth cheapest broadband provider among 30 OECD countries using DSL technology. Sixth out of 30 countries means that customers are getting a very good deal for their money. The price survey was done before we launched new plans in April including an even lower price of NZ$39.95 a month for broadband," Gattung said.

Gattung said when the OECD did its survey late last year, it reported that New Zealand had broadband coverage to 84.8 percent of customers while Australia only had 75 percent.

"Since then we've been increasing coverage and have now reached 92 percent coverage. With wireless broadband from BCL that will be above 95 percent and with satellite coming very soon, broadband will be available to virtually 100 percent of customers," she said.

IDC analyst Warren Chaisatien, however, believes that it is not fair to compare both countries in terms of coverage, saying Australia has much bigger geographical challenges.

"I think in terms of coverage that is true because New Zealand has a much smaller geography. It is a much easier task to do compared to a huge country like Australia. They should compare the level of adoption as well," he said.

The OECD also reported that, in addition to Telecom's coverage, there was increasing broadband competition in rural New Zealand from fixed wireless providers, some acting under the government's program and others under local initiatives.

The report said that Telecom's partnership with local bodies "had delivered broadband to the region at no cost to the councils because demand had exceeded supply and the cost of the technology had decreased."

"In the next couple of months alone we are going to be installing miniaturised DSL technology in 200 sites, which is more than we've ever done since we started the roll-out," Gattung said.

IDC Telecommunications analyst Susana Vidal said that a country's broadband coverage also largely depends on the level of competition in the country as well as the regulations.

"Australia's case is very unique since the government still owns a considerable share in the largest telecommunications company. Lately, regulations in Australia have been loosening up in some aspects like competition; however, it is also strict in the sense that it still looks after its own interest," said Vidal.

She added that the broadband coverage in Australia has considerably increased since the entry of fixed wireless broadband initiative in the country this year. Vidal believes that the entry of these companies will increase coverage especially in rural areas.

"At this point they [have] launched in Sydney but they are planning to have coverage in other cities and Australia wide, especially in rural areas. This will increase broadband coverage in the future but not this year, maybe in the next two years," Vidal said.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Its a pretty poor situation fo ...Anonymous -- 15/05/04

    Its a pretty poor situation for australians when even NZ has us beat with its acccccess to broadband internet.

    Who's to blame? The previous IT/communications minster and his pet little telstra who are still becomming more and more irrelevant to average internet users with their high prices, slow service and hopeless customer support.

    What is amazing is how wrong a ...Anonymous -- 15/05/04

    What is amazing is how wrong a conclusion this article leads one to believe.
    If you are a consumer and want a dsl connection in a New Zealand city, forget about a speed greater than 256k... or a variety of plans/price competition. DSL is basically a monopoly industry in New Zealand.
    No 1.5 meg plans with a decent usage allowance.. or 512k.
    Just full speed with a 1 gig limit which basically makes it useless as you'd chew though that in a week with such speed (and hence dangerous for high excess charges), or 256k and 10 gig then shaping.

    We are 2+ years behind Oz because we are 2+ year behind in unbundling the local loop with no hope in site.

    Sure we may have coverage because the population ain't as dispersed, but no TRUE broadband plans to make use of it with for the average user.

    In response to Anon from Welli ...Anonymous -- 17/05/04

    In response to Anon from Wellington. An 'average' Consumer user does not need more than 10GB at 256k and for those'average' users wanting the Full Speed 1GB should suffice.
    I suspect as a Programmer you do not fall into the 'average' category.

    I totally agree with Anon from ...Anonymous -- 18/05/04

    I totally agree with Anon from Wellington and i work for Telecom. The current 256K plans are what Telecom should have had from the start. Roll on unbundling the local loop.

    I was horrified when I visited ...Anonymous -- 10/08/04

    I was horrified when I visited Australia recently to see how expensive broadband is and the method by which it is charged.Here in England I pay £27.99 ($71.95)a month and think it is theft at that price,but at least it is permanently there and I can use it as much as I like at no extra cost.Broadband here is advertised as being always on,that is it's big selling point.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured