NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

NBN could cost taxpayers $11 billion

Minister for Communications Stephen Conroy today told the Senate Estimates hearing that the government would foot $11 billion of its $43 billion NBN proposal, but admitted its implementation study would determine private sector investment.

At this stage we are envisaging the Commonwealth's commitment to be in the order of $11 billion

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy

Conroy gave his estimate on the basis that the NBN would operate as a government-controlled commercial entity that could issue its own debt in order to cover the estimated $38 billion to $43 billion cost of the project. The figure included the $4.7 billion allocated in the recent Federal Budget.

"We are assuming that it could be funded with a 50/50 debt-equity ratio, and that of the equity the Commonwealth will hold 51 per cent. This means that, at this stage we are envisaging the Commonwealth's commitment to be in the order of $11 billion," Conroy told the hearing today.

While Conroy expressed confidence there would be "substantial interest" from the private sector, he also admitted that interest hinged on the findings to come from its NBN implementation study that has yet to commence. The government allocated $53.2 million to the study at the 2009 Federal Budget.

The study is expected to be critical in determining both the level of interest from the private sector and the extent to which the government can redeploy existing network infrastructure to that envisaged under the NBN.

"I recognise that consideration of these complex issues amongst others will be fundamental to the success of the network," said Conroy. "The study will determine the operating arrangements, detailed network design, and ways to attract private sector investment."

Private sector interest, which Conroy reckons could cut down the $43 billion estimate he has promoted as the cost, included the "possibility that companies will want to vend-in existing assets that can support the National Broadband Network for equity or some other financial arrangements."

The study will look at the configuration of the network, prices that will be offered, future adoption rates, and access services on the FTTP network, said Conroy.

Advertisement

Talkback 15 comments

    Does the Tooth Fairy do fibre Reality Check -- 26/05/09

    Outside of Telstra the most , THE MOST the private sector could come up with was $1 B for NBN 1.0 (FTTN).

    Now the project has gone from costing $10 Billion for 80% of the pop. to $43 Billion for 90% FTTP and now magically the private sector will willingly find $32 BILLION DOLLARS. . . . . And for a project with a declared ROE of barely viable.

    The STUPIDITY of the gullible press is beyond belief.

    All hale our Magnificent leader !! I'm going to North Korea, no wait there's not much point !!

    go rc Anonymous -- 26/05/09 (in reply to #320138358)

    yes please go reality check, they need worthless targets for their next missile test!

    Anonymous is projecting Anonymous -- 26/05/09 (in reply to #320138361)

    Sounds like you dont need anymore conditioning, they got to you at birth and gave you a full labotomy.

    I think your the one who is fodder but does'nt know it.

    Labotomy Anonymous -- 27/05/09 (in reply to #320138383)

    And the ones they missed at birth, they got them just before the last Federal election. But wait, there's hope, Krudd may save the day and give the electorate an early opportunity to correct that mistake.

    Now $11B Steve -- 27/05/09

    The govt is now going to invest $11B on the assumption that the private sector will contribute the rest. But why would the private sector contribute anything until they know they will get a reasonable ROE. The govt has not done a cost benefit analysis or released indicative pricing in order to determine an indicative ROE. I thing the govt's contribution will substantially more than $11B

    See my long post on cost-benefit Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 27/05/09

    In the related story on 'OECD calls for broadband cost-benefit analysis' I posted a long section on how portions make sense, but other portions do not, and the folly of those that are not justifiable ought be exposed via a full cost-benefit.

    OPTUS Spongeing!! Anonymous -- 27/05/09

    See the quote below as to why we are simply in this Mess. Until Singtel is encouraged to invest and create "True Competition" and not some pipedream from the ACCC the situation will not change!!

    "Like leeches, foreign companies are encouraged by lopsided regulations to act like parasites on Telstra's infrastructure, milking the investments of Telstra's 1.6 million shareholders."

    sell Anonymous -- 27/05/09 (in reply to #320138587)

    so, sell your shares sydney

    Telstra shareholders are racist! True Blue Aussie -- 27/05/09 (in reply to #320138587)

    You know what, Anonymous, it's people like you, calling foreign companies a bunch of sponges, that makes Sol think that Australia is full of racists! Either you Telstra shareholders have got a grudge or hatred against Singaporeans, or you're simply creating paranoid propaganda against Singtel for almost everything that happens against Telstra. People like you, Anonymous, are so un-Australian!

    "True Competition" cannot work in a country as large as Australia, especially when one company has complete control over a network that the Australian public paid for and was given to Telstra for free.

    re OPTUS Spongeing Big Al -- 27/05/09 (in reply to #320138587)

    Can you please cite the reference for that quote? It certainly sounds like one from a Telstra staffer rather than in independent commentator.

    he's harmless Anonymous -- 27/05/09 (in reply to #320138693)

    its just sydney, he's harmless. he needs his telstra shares to pick up, so he says silly s..t.

    I doubt it is Sydney Steve -- 28/05/09 (in reply to #320138704)

    I very much doubt it is Sydney as unlike others Sydney does not hide behind Anonymous.

    steve... Anonymous -- 28/05/09 (in reply to #320139042)

    ok steve (of 2 million) if youre not hiding,stand by your convictions and post your email address and home address. steve means jack...t

    Operatic Phantoms. Sydney Lawrence -- 29/05/09 (in reply to #320139138)

    Steve you are correct. It was not Sydney. The lunacy that is posted as intelligent discourse is bitterly disappointing. What hope Australia with people with the mental capacity of retarded chimps projecting their antediluvian diabolic propaganda to the Australian people.

    rodeo clown Anonymous -- 29/05/09 (in reply to #320139390)

    thought you went not to return sydney?

    doesn't matter welcome back, the intelligent discussion we've been having since you went was becoming boring and your senseless telstra comedy routine missed.

    as everyone who doesn't agree with you is accused of being an opponent of telstra, which i am not, why don't you fess up and tell us how many shares it takes for you to make these comedic telstra comments 10 times per day?

    so how many shares do you have syd, 10 000, 20 000, 100 000, more?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • Array Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured