NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Minchin tries members' bill for NBN scrutiny

By Liam Tung, ZDNet.com.au
15 June 2009 08:15 PM
Tags: anao, audit, minchin, nbn, australia

Shadow Communications Minister Nick Minchin has introduced a private members' bill to subject the Government's $43 billion National Broadband Network to a cost/benefit analysis by Infrastructure Australia.

Minchin's bill attempts to amend the Infrastructure Australia Bill 2008, which would bring the National Broadband Network into the scope of the body's assessment and would result in the Minister for Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy Stephen Conroy being compelled to outline how the project was assessed and subsequently release details in parliament.

Infrastructure Australia currently oversees the allocation of the $2.4 billion collected from Telstra's privatisation, which currently sits within in the Building Australia Fund.

"Labor has said its original failed NBN Mark I proposal was immune from [Infrastructure Australia] scrutiny because it was an election promise," Minchin said in a statement yesterday. "This lame excuse does not cut it for NBN Mark II, as it is an entirely different and vastly more expensive proposal."

Minchin targeted Section 5 of the Act, which relates to Infrastructure Australia's duty to evaluate proposals for investment in "nationally significant infrastructure".

"This bill ... is designed to ensure that some degree of proper scrutiny and due diligence is applied to a project that will put at risk billions of taxpayer dollars," Minchin said.

The private members' bill follows a Freedom of Information request by Minchin to access the NBN Expert Panel documents and advice provided by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission which led to it ditching the $4.7 billion NBN proposal.

Earlier this month Minchin succeeded in his effort to have the Australian National Audit Office interrogate the first tender process, with the report due by mid 2010.

If Minchin decided to activate the bill he would still need the support of the Greens and independents to create a debate. There would also be no obligation for the House of Representatives to consider it.

Advertisement

Talkback 16 comments

    FoI Ben Grubb -- 15/06/09

    "The private members' bill follows a failed Freedom of Information request by Minchin"

    Minchin is still in the process of the FoI application.

    Right Renai LeMay -- 16/06/09 (in reply to #320143424)

    hey Ben,

    you're right, it is still in the process, I will amend the article.

    Cheers,

    Renai LeMay
    News Editor
    ZDNet.com.au

    another one for Ol' Nick Anonymous -- 16/06/09

    Senator Nick could expand his pmb to include an investigation of the cost to Australia (and Australians) resulting from the previous government selling Telstra as a fixed-line monopoly.

    After all, he was said to be one of the main supporters of including the network in the sale, which resulted in the situation that we have to live with at present.

    Telstra Sharholders screwed!!!! Anonymous -- 18/06/09

    Qiut simply the Government will not release the information because they will lose the upper hand & be exposed as to how they plan to screw Telstra shareholders when/IF they "vend" in to NBN!!!

    easy answer Anonymous -- 18/06/09 (in reply to #320144154)

    sell

    re easy answer Anonymous -- 19/06/09 (in reply to #320144220)

    A typical reply, from the ill informed. In other words, if it is a Telstra problem, stuff 'em.

    yes it is easy Anonymous -- 19/06/09 (in reply to #320144537)

    a typical reply from a poor sorry shareholder. who has lost too much to sell.

    Thodey should not VEND in!! Anonymous -- 19/06/09 (in reply to #320144548)

    Sol had one thing right!!

    Management should be shot if the dismember Telstra!!!

    Wrong there. Anonymous -- 23/06/09 (in reply to #320144548)

    Nope, got none to sell. Nor do you obviously, but why the terse comment.

    Nothing has changed - I mean Telstras competitive right? They have a good produc Anonymous -- 22/06/09 (in reply to #320144154)

    If Testra have fair prices and a good product that can stand on its own mertis, they can't be screwed by NBN anymore than any other Teclo/ISP.

    If you as a shareholder allowed Telstra to operate so that it did not have good product, fair prices etc, well you reap what you sow.

    Its not like Telstra will lose it's current infrastructure, and Telstra will presumably have access to the NBN themselves, allbeit non exclusive.

    So all that will change is that they will have competition.
    Which is of course a real problem for Telstra, because they have elected to abuse their incumbant position and remain non competitive for so long.

    Oh well.
    So sad. Learn fast, sink or swim.

    Nothing has changed - I mean Telstras competitive right? They have a good produc mbj -- 27/06/09 (in reply to #320144985)

    You sound like a typical anti-Telstra commentator, Why do you always expect lowest price. So keep on backing the overseas interests, keep bagging Telstra, and keep on being un-Australian.

    no nothing has changed.... Anonymous -- 28/06/09 (in reply to #320145887)

    Exposed again...................dammit, but still trying !!! I will however stick with the principle that in most cases what you pay for is what you get. And with Telstra you get what you pay for (I believe in most cases).

    @nothing has changed Anonymous -- 28/06/09 (in reply to #320146036)

    yes you pay for overpaid execs to do a half baked transformation, introduce a flawed billing system, **ss off the government, workforce, unions, accc, customers, primarily anyone but sucky shareholders and then go ***t it's all too hard give me my $30m, see ya later.

    yes with telstra you get what you pay for and you deserve what you get - enjoy.

    re @nothing has changed. Anonymous -- 28/06/09 (in reply to #320146046)

    Well Jason, nothing at all has changed in your attitude towards Telstra shareholders, that's for sure. What is your problem ? Is it because you never had the opportunity to own Telstra shares, that makes you so bitter. It is not the fault of (the majority at least) of Telstra shareholders that the 3 Amigos were hired, and paid what they were. The Mum and Dad shareholders of Australia, that were sucked in by the Howard Governments sale of Telstra, had f..k all to do with the running of the company, but you treat us all, as if we did, and are responsible for the way Sol and his insiders ran the place. All I can say is, "get a life mate" and stop bagging Telstra like you do. Whatever pleasure you get out of seeing Telstra shares doing badly, is a mystery to me, and I just cannot understand what motivates you to do it, unless you are simply hoping that a lot of people lose out on something that you do not have.

    Taxpayers screwed under NBN!!! Anonymous -- 18/06/09

    Refer to this article as to how Taxpayers will be screwed!!

    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/let-telstra-get-on-with-what-it-does-best-20090617-chsy.html?page=-1

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured