Labor officially dismantles Howard's broadband experts

Labor's new Broadband Minister has officially dismantled the expert taskforce installed by the Howard government to set up its planned fibre-to-the-node network.

In an announcement sent to interested parties on Friday, the expert taskforce said that the development of guidelines around the network has now been stopped.

"The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, has decided that the Expert Taskforce will not be continued. On this basis, and in accordance with section 10.1(i) of the Guidelines for High Speed Broadband Network Infrastructure Proposals, the process has been terminated," the announcement said.

The taskforce, set up in June, attracted almost 50 submissions from local government bodies, industry groups, telcos and other interested parties.

During his time in opposition, Labor's Conroy was critical of the taskforce and promised earlier this year to dismiss the Howard government's panel and replace it with a Labor-picked group "that knows something about telecoms".

Labor is now planning its own open access fibre-to-the-node network, covering 98 percent of the Australian population.

Telstra has already criticised the Labor plan, with CEO Sol Trujillo signalling the telco's reluctance to get involved in a public-private partnership with the government -- reluctance the Minister for Broadband dismissed as "jockeying".

"We will hold an open and transparent process to determine who will build the network with our ambition being to complete the process by the end of June next year," Conroy said. "We expect that there will be much public commentary, jockeying and lobbying from parties as they work to convince the government that they are best placed to build the new network and seek the terms that are most favourable to them."

Advertisement

Talkback 22 comments

    Not a complete loss Anonymous -- 10/12/07

    I'm sure some third world country would welcom Howard's broadband experts with open arms.

    Con Coonan. Sydney Lawrence -- 10/12/07 (in reply to #320091387)

    I hear that they have categorically refused to take Coonan however.

    At least we don't have Lawrence Comm Jason Torrento -- 10/12/07 (in reply to #320091401)

    The good thing I guess, is we don't have the likes of Sydney Lawrence or Telstra shareholders running telecommunications and regulation and making decisions like that.

    Not only would families struggle, the nation would be essentially bending down before the telecommunications giant as 'the government'.

    One might even point out the tax office would suffer as a result of the greed driven idiots behind Telstra.

    Monopolise that! Telstra Anonymous -- 11/12/07

    Hopefully the government will have the backbone to separate Telstra from the last mile copper in the ground and return it to public ownership. They can then bulid a fair-use network that isn't a monopoly.

    Raid the kitty. Sydney Lawrence -- 11/12/07 (in reply to #320091433)

    Would you care to make the first donation to the $100,000,000,000 cost of you suggestion.

    Costly yes, but also necessary Magnus Greel -- 11/12/07 (in reply to #320091440)

    Just a little bit of an overestimate there Syd old chap? It would be cheaper for the government to buy back a controlling interest in Telstra, kick the greed machine USA management to the curb and install people to do what is required for the country. Whether the government would have the political will (balls) to do this is another question entirely.

    Syd shows old age Jason Torrento -- 11/12/07 (in reply to #320091440)

    Sydney,

    I'm amazed at just how false your comment is.

    It'd cost no where near $100,000,000,000 to buy back a 51% interest in Telstra. That's all they need to seperate it.

    In fact, they could instead compulsory acquire the complete telephone network, and they'd only have to pay less than the total value of the $34,000,000,000 in tax cuts.

    How you get to $100 billion from a company that only seems to earn a shrinking $3 billion is beyond me.

    They don't even own that much in assets, or marketshare.

    As I said in an earlier post. Thank heavens you aren't the one controlling regulation in this country.

    Better future John Van Der Loo -- 11/12/07

    Having a solid network NOT owned by one company that aims to monopolize the market is a good thing for this country. It's time Australia shaped up and put a decent internet infrastructure in place that is a lot more accessible and with a much much higher availability.
    Yes, sure a very high percentage of people can get "Broadband", but a large number of people that have it are experiencing slower and poorer quality services at higher prices.

    This will be a step in the right direction.

    Everyone wants to talk about monopolies Aaron Saunders -- 11/12/07

    All of you people who comment about monopolies you need to consider that whoever gets the governments go ahead to build this will be in a monopoly position. Do you think we will be here praising company X that they won and defending company Y because they should have won? WAKE UP PEOPLE!!! You will bag the winner regardless of who it is, that is your nature.

    If Telstra doesn't build this network you will all be sitting around in a couple of years saying to each other "boy I didn't realise how good Telstra was until now".

    anonymous Anonymous -- 11/12/07

    and labor is paying for this how?

    Money Anonymous -- 11/12/07 (in reply to #320091464)

    Paying for it with the Future Fund

    Future Fund Anonymous -- 11/12/07 (in reply to #320091476)

    The Future Fund should not be touched.

    Labor's plans are not good.

    As a side note:
    Looks like a couple of Telstra employees are posting on here.

    Future fund Anonymous -- 12/12/07 (in reply to #320091495)

    Why shouldn't the future fund be touched? Telstra was owned by all Australians but the future fund only benefits public servants.

    The fund should benefit the other 20 million Australians and be used to return the infrastructure to public ownership.

    Do you have super? Anonymous -- 13/12/07 (in reply to #320091564)

    Do you have any idea? No probably not. The future fund is to guarantee superannuation returns for the public service. Just as you have superannuation and your fund has to follow rules and regulations to ensure that you get your money plus back the future fund is to guarantee those returns for the public service.

    The government does not own this money it is owned by all those people who work for the government. If it is used on infrastructure then they need to make sure that they get a return on the investment.

    The FF is to pay entitlements Anonymous -- 14/12/07 (in reply to #320091564)

    Mate, the FF is to pay their (public servants) entitlements, which are unfunded without the Future Fund.
    That means we have to pay the money some other way now. So the fund was benefitting all Australians. We'll now have to pay those entitlements through tax hikes later down the track.
    The ALP have fooled everyone into believing their plan is affordable. All they're doing is throwing more of my (and your) money than the coalition would have.
    That's pretty annoying seeing as I'm already paying for my broadband and am quite happy with it.

    Let the universities build it! Anonymous -- 11/12/07

    What do we want to enrich with a network upgrade. Do we want to enrich our future or do we want to enrich a bunch of corporate flunkies who cannot think outside the square.

    Giving design/build ownership to our universities will also benefit the schools of the future policy. Initial infrastructure costs can be higher because there will be little or no rental costs associated with the "education institution" owned network. Wholesale bandwith and maintenance can be sold off to Telstra and company who can bring it to the homes or use it for other commercial interests.

    PS: Syd's not a bad old chap, just a little misguided. He just needs to see the light.

    Uni students? Anonymous -- 14/12/07 (in reply to #320091502)

    Nice idea, but you'd have to get the Arts & Humanities students (you know, the ones who aren't going to get a job at the end of their "degree") across Australia to put down their bongs for a full afternoon to listen to the plan, and as soon as you mentioned "manual labour", it'd be over. Man.

    Professor emeritus Anonymous -- 28/12/07 (in reply to #320091679)

    This new network is predominanlty a data network which is much easier to build.

    The Australian universities gaves us AARNET which for many years was the backbone of the internet in Australia before coporations finally saw the light.

    I think if you looked into how the engineering faculties are run you would have a more positive outlook on this proposal.

    hahaha Lord Watchdog -- 09/01/08 (in reply to #320091679)

    Good call - very good call ;-)

    At last the truth! Anonymous -- 12/12/07

    http://erijustice.atspace.com/index.html

    Typically Labor Lord Watchdog -- 09/01/08

    All this does is prove that Labor is still wallowing in a policy vacuum.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured