Howard blasts "reckless" Labor broadband plan

AAP

Prime Minister John Howard today accused Labor of being reckless and short-sighted in proposing to raid the Future Fund to pay for a high-speed broadband network.

Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd today unveiled a plan to use up to AU$2.7 billion of the Telstra shares held in the fund to establish the network.

"This appears to be an economically irresponsible way of funding a program," Howard told parliament. "It also appears to be short-sighted with no regard for the future and no regard to the fact that of all the challenges this country faces, none is greater than the ageing of our population."

"Raiding the Future Fund is recklessly indifferent to the welfare of future generations of Australians."

The prime minister said Labor's plan was to rob future generations in order to nourish the current generation. "Labor has fallen at the first hurdle of economic responsibility," he said. "They couldn't resist it, they've reverted to type and gone back to their old habits. This is the first instalment of Labor's pattern of betrayal of the interests of future generations of Australians."

Treasurer Peter Costello described the opposition's plan as "shameful economic vandalism".

Costello said the International Monetary Fund had lauded the establishment of the Future Fund as leaving Australia well placed to meet the challenges of an ageing population.

"All of this is under threat in what I regard as the most irresponsible announcement of the past 11 years made today by Labor," he told parliament. The treasurer said legislation would have to be changed to retrieve the money, making the fund vulnerable to further raids. "Once that Future Fund is open, it is open for all purposes and the only losers will be future generations of Australians."

Costello added Rudd's announcement was a humiliation for Labor treasury spokesman Wayne Swan, who in 2005 said the fund should be a "locked box".

The Future Fund was set up to pay for the superannuation entitlements of public servants.

Coonan's view
In a statement issued this afternoon, Communications Minister Senator Helen Coonan said the new ALP policy was "nothing more than a re-heated [Kim] Beazley proposal".

"Labor's proposal will entrench its legendary neglect for rural and regional Australia by abolishing the AU$2 billion Communications Fund earmarked to ensure that non-metropolitan Austraians can get reliable services in the future," the Minister said.

"Added to this, Labor announced today that it is prepared to throw out its ideological opposition to the sale of Telstra, provided they can now get their hands on the money. This is textbook Labor, and a very clear signal that if elected, they will spend the Future Fund and send Australia back into recession."

"Australians still vividly remember the 'recession they had to have', and today's announcement is akin to giving the bank robber the keys to the vault," Coonan added.

 


© 2007 Australian Associated Press Pty Limited (AAP) or its Licensors. This is the ZDNet Australia TM service with content provided by AAP. AAP reserves all rights, including copyright, in services provided by it. The information, text and images in the service are for personal use only and may not be re-written, copied, re-sold or re-distributed, framed, linked or otherwise used whether for compensation of any kind or not, without the prior written permission of AAP.
This service is published for information only without assuming a duty of care. AAP is not in the business of providing professional advice, and gives no warranty, guarantee or other representation about the accuracy of the information or images contained in this service. AAP is not liable for errors, omissions in, delays or interruptions to or cessation of the services through negligence or otherwise.
The globe symbol and "AAP" are registered trade marks.
Advertisement

Talkback 22 comments

    Labour plans of Internet censorship in AU Anonymous -- 21/03/07

    are they still on? If so, they'll not getting my vote

    http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/mandatoryblocking.html

    John Howard - Networking Genius! Rex Alfie Lee -- 21/03/07

    Here's a man who knows all there is to know about technology & the future of it. Here's a man with foresight & a crystal ball who knows what should be being done. Yeah right! What John knows amounts to "bugger-all"

    Why John, are you the epitome of a hole in the rear?

    You screwed Telstra & continue to allow Telstra to screw us. Here we are being left behind in the global telecommunications, thanks to Telstra & yourself & you criticise someone else who offers to play some catch-up. At least it's an idea in the right direction & perhaps you are so far behind the real world in its beliefs that you feel you know what's going on.

    Three things you don't know Johnnie are technology, education & the environment. Everybody knows you are wrong but you. We need the technology & the education to manage the years ahead. We need people who know who we are & what we want in this world but you just forge ahead biting at George's heels. We don't want that.

    We want & need technology, education & the Kyoto protocol & one more for good measure; John Howard out of a job.

    Al this time Anonymous -- 22/03/07

    All this time we have not had a plan, we have been spinning the wheels for many years due to a govt that is not comfortable with long term commitments or spending money on public infrastructure. Perhaps if the Howard govt had a plan in the first place they could be critical.

    You mean... Anonymous -- 23/03/07 (in reply to #320076664)

    ...long term commitments like paying off around $100 Billion in Labor debt saving us millions of $ in interest repayments, cleaning up the waterfront, freeing up the job market, commiting to stabilising Afghanistan and Iraq and eliminating our enemies, introducing a GST which sees the states swimming in money even while their health and transport services suffer, setting up a protected Future Fund in order to provide public servant's Super, delivering justice for E. Timorese, wresting control over the Murray Darling from self interested states and commiting $10 billion to making it more efficient, abolishing unfair dismissal for small business contributing to lowest unemployment in 30 years, contributing $1 Billion in aid after the Tsunami in Indonesia, historically low interest rates, achieving Kyoto aims without having to destroy our economy and sign over control to extremists in the UN and Europe....etc...etc...etc

    long term stuff like that? Yeah, they'd never. ; )

    Nice one Anonymous -- 02/04/07 (in reply to #320076714)

    The only reason things a 'ok' is because of Coal. Alas, the Howard government can't even get that right.
    You sound like Costello, riding on the back of luck and the doings of others (like Labor making all the hard decisions for the better good, not just better for large corporations). Don't be brainwashed my friend.

    Kevin the big spender Brad -- 22/03/07

    Kevin Rudd is good at spending money that isn't his. I am all for a much faster Internet but not at the expense of the nation's capacity to save money.

    ISPs earn the big bikkies from our monthly subscriptions. Let those profit-hungry ba$tard$ foot the bill. It makes me laugh how people like Internode's Simon Hackett can enter what has always been an industry hostile to small players and he comes along and tries to change things to suit him. It reminds me of that song - 'What about me?'

    Labor has promised to raid the Future Fund and they should be kept in opposition at the election in November. If Labor was to win (and I don't think they will) they will use the Future Fund to finance their entire pork barrel and then plunge the nation back into recession.

    See the forest for the trees. Don't trust Labor with YOUR money.

    RE: Kevin the big spender Anonymous -- 22/03/07 (in reply to #320076676)

    "YOUR money" ... not unless I am a govt worker wanting future super funds payed out of MY money. I have paid for my own super, MY taxes paid for telstra (well, helped a little) - why dont the pollies & old govt employees pay for thier own super ... dont raid OUR assets and then say the money is not for public use.

    Or do we now subscribe to PUBLIC health/education/etc being only for those belonging to the PUBLIC service.

    Brad & Anonymous Rex Alfie Lee -- 22/03/07 (in reply to #320076685)

    You sound like Liberal party members to me. If you had half a brain, either of you, you would realise that the Gov't has done absolutely nothing towards Australia's infrastructure; meaning education or technology let alone the environment.

    If either of you had a quarter of a brain you would realise that at least Rudd's premise is in the right direction. Howard's sell-off of Telstra has screwed Australia's telecommunication's industry. Once upon a time they were a great company but now they are run by yet another American CEO, one that destroyed 2 Telco's before he came here bcoz his focus is not service, rather the shareholders. What is Telstra there for if not service?

    So, what's your point if you can't see "the forest for the trees"? Huh?

    It's a shame Helen Coonan isn't going to be the minister for Labor when they get in bcoz her nouse is grouse & she's tried very hard to do the right thing, something very few minister's in Mr Coward's group have done. He, like Mr "Sun shines out his backside" Sol, couldn't care less about services & the cost of them to the public. Ask him how much a litre of milk costs or petrol despite the fact that our dollar is now worth over 80cents US but petrol continues to rise.

    Yes, I use a lot of euphemisms & anecdotes to describe my point bcoz, guess what; I can & why; bcoz I know a little of what I'm talking about & obviously you don't.

    Nope, dead wrong Brad -- 23/03/07 (in reply to #320076695)

    "Yes, I use a lot of euphemisms & anecdotes to describe my point bcoz, guess what; I can & why; bcoz I know a little of what I'm talking about & obviously you don't."

    If you are such a literary genius then why don't you learn to spell. Your spelling is as flawed as your point of view on telecommunications.

    Get a clue mate. If you become an employee of the crown and you are offered taxpayer-funded superannuation then it is only right for that to last the distance. I am not saying it is fair for the taxpayer to fund superannuation - its just the way it is and it was probably your Labor mates that introduced such a thing anyway.

    The fact is that the Future Fund has been put in place so that the taxpayer no longer has to bear the burden. It is a fund that earns interest and dividencs and is therefor indexed to grow continually.

    This will happen unless Labor wins in November and Kevin Rudd is allowed to spend the lot on feeble election promises.

    To ensure fairness in the Internet Service Industry the Government should focus more on the people who cannot currently get broadband access. For the time-being, metropolitan speeds are fast enough.

    ye olde man Anonymous -- 02/04/07 (in reply to #320076728)

    By the time you are allowed to retire if Liberals have anything to do with it, you will be 80+ years old. Dont think for one minute that your money is protected in the hands of these people, and that by the time you retire you can get more than only dribbles of it over the rest of your life.

    Howard/Coonan - 56K, Rudd - 24Mbps Mame du Bois -- 22/03/07

    I find it incredulous that Senator Coonan is taking the moral high ground on this issue. Despite having nearly a decade to improve internet services to regional Australians, there are many people living within a short drive of larger cities who STILL can't access anything other than dial-up speeds.

    I only moments ago decided against forwarding a short video onto a friend because their dial-up service, provided by Telstra is so poor that they can barely manage to download above 34kb/s. These friends live 30 minutes outside of Toowoomba and only 1.5 hours west of Brisbane.

    These friends were astounded by my 'lightning fast' 256K broadband service. To curb their ire I have failed to mention that I recently upgraded to a 1.5Mbps service which even I consider slow as I eagerly await cheaper ADSL2 access.

    The Howard government has failed Australia in terms of IT infrastructure.

    Regarding Kevin Rudd and the raiding of the future fund to pay for Labors plans for improving the broadband network; I think it is a good idea simply because it will be an investment in the Australian community.

    John Howard and Helen Coonans reactionary outbursts just goes to show how apathetic and out of step he and his government is to the IT needs of Australians.

    Short memories Trevor Greenfield -- 22/03/07

    I think people want to keep in perspective that the LAST budget gave away 10Billion (or was it 16Billion) dollars in 'tax savings'.
    The majority of the public in opinion polls at the time wanted the money to be put into infrastructure projects, yet the government hasn't done this, and now has the gall to take the moral high ground.
    Politicians just aim to get elected again, they do little planning that could take them past the next election.
    I believe that decisions on who is best for the country is decided on results. To date I see very few real results that have come from the incumbent government's initiatives.

    Rather a Liberal tax cut than a Labor tax hike. Anonymous -- 23/03/07 (in reply to #320076707)

    I love my tax savings and so does the economy and my Super.

    What liberal tax cuts? Trevor Greenfield -- 24/03/07 (in reply to #320076717)

    They give back peanuts.
    Since the GST began, the present government has been creaming in our money, and you are fooled by the little they give back in return. I would rather have them invest in the future.
    They have get to show any abatement of our disastrous balance of payments ledger. You live in a fool's paradise.

    Payments out of balance Brad -- 05/04/07 (in reply to #320076799)

    Balance of payments has more to do with retailers like Coles, Woolworths, Myers, David Jones, Bunnings, et al, becoming sales outlets for China than anything to do with the government's policy on national savings.

    It is patently ridiculous to spend national savings on an election bribe and come election time people will see Kevin Rudd's promise for the pork barrelling exercise that it is. At any rate Labor couldn't keep an election promise of any sort even if they tripped over the instruction manual and fell face down on the table of contents.

    howard's angst jock mc murtrie -- 23/03/07

    this toad,howard, is really upset because he's run out of ideas.he and the other two clowns,Abbot and Costello,rant and rave about rudd spending a few billion.meantime they buy all the used crap that the usaaf and us army want to get rid off.NOT to mention IRAQ,of course,which this government was certainly not elected to invade.they are also spending millions on advertising and will spend MILLIONS more before the election.i suppose some will be happy to get another "hamburger and coffee" tax cut,not realising that this would pay for the proposed investment in new technology.not all the clowns are in government-i know at least 4 who voted for them last time
    yours truly,Jock

    Labour's plans Anonymous -- 23/03/07

    Now let's get this right. A series of country towns has a rail service, but it's a bit slow. I want to provide a super high speed train service to these towns, but I want the government to risk it's money on the infrastructure, and I just want to cream the income from the railway, with none of the risks.
    *substitute whatever you want for railway.

    I always thought that businesses were there to take the risks. If Murdoch and Packer want the high speed network, why don't they put their money into it themselves.

    God-damn right! ginger fraser -- 23/03/07 (in reply to #320076763)

    Why can't those that stand to make the money from infrastructure be made to pay the frigging costs by way of a levy or something? Rudd can go get stuffed.

    Big Picture Mame du Bois -- 26/03/07 (in reply to #320076769)

    This is not just about people in the bush (who pay the same tax as the people in the city) getting their emails a bit faster, its about economic development and future economic growth. In a technological age, bandwidth is as important as roads. This makes it a Government issue.

    A good idea Anonymous -- 17/04/07 (in reply to #320076881)

    Hear hear. The above commentators act as if the users derive no benefit from high speed access. If the government can act to set up a new marketplace it is going to help the economy overall. The best thing about the internet is that it lowered the barriers to entry for startup businesses- with good infrastructure these bush towns can act on the global stage.

    The definition of short-sighted Patrick Harding -- 03/04/07

    "It also appears to be short-sighted with no regard for the future and no regard to the fact that of all the challenges this country faces, none is greater than the ageing of our population."

    Imagine being so short sighted that you'd sell out (or worse, dismiss) the future of the entire planet you live on just for short term gain .. oh wait ..

    The argument over who funds the national information infrastructure could be settled very naturally with a little sensible regulation. Try these rules;

    = The comparative amount you invest sets the ratio of profit sharing
    = All investors agree to either;
    - Roll-out the full-speed and low latency network to 100% of the 2010 population
    - Roll-out the full-speed and low latency network to the currently serviced population percentage and provide no less than 8Mbit satellite service to the remainder of the 2010 population at no cost to those users (as settlement for penalising those users with low bandwidth and high latency - thus a substantially reduced service).

    If the governement are still the only people willing to step up to the plate, then so be it. They can also claim the subscription revenue of the better part of 20 million users; I'm sure the ABC would appreciate the cheap access to Australian homes.

    Telstra and Rudd proposal Anonymous -- 20/04/07

    I hope that either the G9 proposal or the Rudd idea will be adopted and implemented ASAP.

    The current government made the 'big' mistake by NOT dividing (or separating existing divisions?) Telstra into wholesale and retail... - Wholesale would have been able to deal with G9 and similar- and retail would have been on the other side of wholesale -- e.g. the side of customers!!

    I'm a Telstra shareholder - and am totally disgusted at the way this 'yank' is behaving -- and we should also look at the Board that appointed this bloke! Isn't there anything ordinary shareholders could do?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured