Govt to sell AU$8 billion in Telstra shares

AAP

The federal government will sell part of its 51.8 percent stake in Telstra to the public in October and November, Prime Minister John Howard said today.

Howard said the government would offer AU$8 billion in stock to retail and institutional investors in Australia and overseas.

"The government's remaining Telstra shares will be transferred to the Future Fund for the fund to sell down over time," Howard said in a statement.

Howard said the government had gone to the past four elections promising to sell its Telstra shares.

"For too long, the government has had a massive conflict of interest, as the owner and seller of Australia's largest telco, and as the industry regulator," he said.

"Selling Telstra continues to be good policy that is in the interests of existing Telstra shareholders, in the interests of the company and in the interests of the broader community."

The Prime Minister said the government believed it could achieve an appropriate return on taxpayers' money with a sale at this time. "Our sale advisers have been closely assessing market conditions and their unanimous advice to the government is that there is sufficient demand to support an offer of this magnitude and it can be done at a fair price," said Howard.

The structure of the massive sale would be finalised before the offer launch. "Retail investors will be able to pay for their shares in two instalments over 18 months but will be entitled to the full dividend that Telstra intends to declare at 28 cents for the next year," said Howard.

However the Prime Minister noted a final decision to launch the offer remained subject to "market conditions being conducive for a sale which achieves the government's sale objectives".

Regulatory regime "settled"
Howard also sent a strong message to the telecommunications industry on the issue of government regulation.

"We believe the regulatory framework is now settled and we expect all companies to plan and operate within the rules that have been set," he said.

"The cornerstone safeguards of the Universal Service Obligation, the Customer Service Guarantee, price controls and other important consumer protections, will continue to apply to Telstra and all carriers because they are all provided in regulation and not subject to review until 2009."

Pointing out the government did not have to own Telstra in order to regulate the telco, Howard said the government remained committed to regulating the industry "in the interests of protecting consumers".

The Telstra reaction
Telstra welcomed the move in a statement sent to the Australian Stock Exchange this afternoon.

"Telstra's board and management have always been supportive of the sale of the government's remaining stake in Telstra and we are pleased that this will now occur," said Telstra chairman Donald McGauchie.

Earlier, Howard revealed that Telstra's chairman, Board and senior management had assured the government of their strong commitment to the sale. "In particular, Telstra has made it clear that they will not use the sale process as a vehicle to campaign for changes to the regulatory regime," the Prime Minister said.

On its part, Telstra said the company would work with the government during the sale process to ensure its success, despite the telco's recent criticism of the nation's telecommunications regulatory regime.

"It is well-known that Telstra is critical of the current regulatory regime, but we accept our legal obligations under that regime. Telstra will fulfill its disclosure obligations during the sell down process," said McGauchie.

"This may involve explaining the impact of the regulatory regime on the company. Any comments will be proportionate, measured and factual. Telstra will not use such explanations or the sale process as a vehicle to campaign for changes to the regulatory regime."



© 2006 Australian Associated Press Pty Limited (AAP) or its Licensors. This is the ZDNet Australia TM service with content provided by AAP. AAP reserves all rights, including copyright, in services provided by it. The information, text and images in the service are for personal use only and may not be re-written, copied, re-sold or re-distributed, framed, linked or otherwise used whether for compensation of any kind or not, without the prior written permission of AAP.
This service is published for information only without assuming a duty of care. AAP is not in the business of providing professional advice, and gives no warranty, guarantee or other representation about the accuracy of the information or images contained in this service. AAP is not liable for errors, omissions in, delays or interruptions to or cessation of the services through negligence or otherwise.
The globe symbol and "AAP" are registered trade marks.
Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Pigs might fly! Keith Styles -- 25/08/06 (in reply to #120140858)

    The chairman says:

    Telstra will not use such explanations or the sale process as a vehicle to campaign for changes to the regulatory regime."

    They hell they wont!

    Give them an inch & they will take mile & a half.

    The 3 Amigos! Keith Styles -- 26/08/06 (in reply to #120140860)

    See,.. not 24 hrs after they said they'd play ball, Burgess attacks again & puts his foot in his mouth.

    From the SMH:
    "But Telstra's head of public policy, Phil Burgess, said yesterday the company could not give assurances it would not respond publicly if the competition regulator made "adverse decisions".

    "We are not going to give up our legal rights and obligations," Mr Burgess said. "Hopefully there won't be any reason to do that [comment publicly] if the regulator behaves itself.""

    Their arrogance is beyond belief. Thank god we have the ACCC to protect us, even though they don't do much of it at times.

    Who said assets that belong to the people can be sold by the govt of the day? FullName -- 28/08/06

    It is amazing that assets that belong to the people can be sold off by a bunch of people that are elected for 3 years. It is NOT theirs to own. It is NOT theirs to sell.
    Why isn't anyone but myself calling for the heads of these people?
    Public assets such as Telstra were created by the people for the people, they where NOT created to be sold off!
    Public utilitites are NEEDED by the people, the Government is elected to administer those utilities NOT sell them off! why are they being sold off to businessess???...

    Communication, electricity, water supply etc. should never be given over to business..there is NO accountability...at least with governments you can kick them out after a few years..they run and ensure protection of our systems or they are out of a job.

    Selling off telstra isnt gonna make it better (look at the petrol industry)....

    Oh i see, so that the Government cannot be held accountable for its administration? Easy way out more likely....

    So why have a Government at all? When all they do is sell off anything that we the people make and need and tax us for things we don't want (IRAQ)?

    Why follow my Government when they steal from me?

    John Howard and co. should be jailed for fleecing Australia....

    There is something very wrong with this country and something very wrong with the people in it too..

    Who said assets that belong to the people can be sold by the govt of the day? Anonymous -- 25/09/06 (in reply to #120141018)

    The trouble is that Australians keep on voting these crooks in.
    Acoording to Finance writer Kenneth Davidson of the Age, the Howard government sold off $72 billion in public assets between 1996 - 2004.
    Not to be outdone, state labour governments have jumped on the gravy train.
    If things go wrong, and the nation needs to sell of assets, none will be left to sell. In board rooms around the world there will just be happy grins.
    I too have dreams of police divvy vans filled with politicians on their way to a well deserved 'holiday'.

    Telstra shares sold - unbelievable! Rex Alfie Lee -- 29/08/06

    I concur with the previous notes except where one says that the ACCC haven't done too well. Up against Sol (he was proclaimed the Sun itself & I'm sure if he bends over you may see shards of light bursting forth) Trujillo, perhaps in his own eyes, God himself, & his screaming, whiny, attempts at undermining the telecommunications industry; I believe Helen Coonan has done a pretty good job. She's stuck at it despite the crap from Trujillo who should go back to the states & screw-up as he did before. The fact that he was ever placed in the position he was after his magestic failure in the good old US of A has got to be the proud Howard-cum-Bush experiment of Evangelical terrorism. The magnitude of this failure is possibly befitting of the Exclusive Brethren, aka white fellas in white, tall, pointy hats with holes for their eyes or was it the Nazi's. There isn't a lot a lot of difference anyway & I bet they came here from the states too.

    As far as the sale of Telstra 3 shares are concerned, I can't imagine they're worth the paper they're printed on. Within a very short time wireless of all kinds will emerge to make copper lines & fibre-optic lines redundant. This removes Telstra from any bargaining position at all.

    I don't believe any of Telstra should ever have been sold until now. Why not? It isn't worth anything anyway so why not sell it to the dummies?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured