G9 to launch FTTN bid as alterego, Terria

By Marcus Browne, ZDNet.com.au
21 May 2008 05:53 PM
Tags: terria, optus, egan, g9, telstra, bid, fttn

The G9 consortium has announced its transformation into a new entity named Terria, ahead of lodging its AU$5 million bond with the government to bid on the national fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network.

Terria chairman, former NSW Treasurer, Michael Egan declared that the consortium had unified under the Terria banner, derived from 'Terra Australis', in keeping with its stated aim of providing coverage to 98 percent of Australia's population.

Egan also took the opportunity to call for national competition reform &mdash including further demands for the structural separation of Telstra &mdash saying: "The mistake in the early 1990s was in leaving in place a structure where new telecommunications entrants were left largely at the mercy of the market dominant Telstra."

"Australia can't afford the same mistake being made again which is what will happen if Telstra is allowed to roll out another national network without separating its anti-competitive commercial interests," he continued.

"There's a view that Telstra is in the box seat with this bid. But if you look at what [Communications Minister] Senator Conroy has been saying Telstra is not listening. He's made it clear there will be regulatory and legislative changes," said Egan.

The Terria chairman said that the group has been finalising its own broadband model which structurally separates the vested interests of each individual company, including management, operations and accountability.

Optus, the largest in the former group of nine ISPs &mdash which also includes AAPT, PowerTel, iiNet, Internode, Macquarie Telecom, Primus, Soul and TransAct &mdash also announced yesterday that it would lodge its own, separate AU$5 million bond to bid on the network, should the need arise.

"This doesn't mean Optus is not fully committed to the Terria bid," said Optus director of government and corporate affairs Maha Krishnapillai.

"Optus wants an industry-led bid," he added.

AAP contributed to this article
Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Yip Yip Anonymous -- 21/05/08

    Oh now the G9 has some bark!!!

    "K9" gcarlile@cdscc.nasa.gov -- 29/05/08 (in reply to #320102239)

    That should be K9

    Even Optus has no confidence Anonymous -- 21/05/08

    Lodge a second solo bond?

    This shows that even the leader of the consortium has no confidence in th G9.

    This also raises the question of if they do lodge a second solo bid will the two companies have inside information about each other's bids.

    Optus has a long track record of manipulating bids under different names by lodging multiple responses using their different 100% owned entities while knowingly sharing information.

    How would everyone react if Telstra also lodged a bid under the Telstra Clear, Reach or Sensis banners?

    Gret point, I use to work for Optus and saw this first hand Optus cheats -- 24/05/08 (in reply to #320102246)

    I saw these actions first hand when submitting responses to RFP's & RFT's for clients. I would be handed network designs and quotes made by the same tenders and told to make sure the design and quote did not compete and was at a premium to ensure we covered different measurement criteria. I lodged a complaint internally and also to the ACCC, nothing happened.

    The truth will set you free. Sydney Lawrence -- 22/05/08

    This stupidity must stop.

    Firstly, how could any Government consider giving the vital Australian telecommunication facility to a company owned and controlled by a foreign Government.

    Secondly, how could the ACCC consider a applicant who demands a twenty year holiday from competition and in fact demands that they be allowed to operate as a monopoly.

    Thirdly, how could anyone consider a situation be allowed that would stop competition and the halt the supply of advanced technology to Australia for that twenty years.

    Last, what percentage of the Optus group is owned by Optus. I would think it would be very large, thereby showing the equal joint ownership claim to be a sham.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured