NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Future Fund won't protest Telstra split

Future Fund chief executive Paul Costello yesterday remained tight-lipped in the face of sustained questioning over the fund's stance, as an investor, on the pending legislated separation of Telstra's operations.

It seems to us completely inappropriate to insert ourselves into a discussion

Future Fund CEO Paul Costello

Former Communications Minister Helen Coonan criticised the Future Fund for its silence on the government's legislation which, if passed, would separate Telstra's retail and wholesale arms. Coonan noted that the fund was not silent over Sol Trujillo's pay.

"It's baffling that you'd be so proactive on some matters," said Coonan, adding that there appeared to be "an eerie silence on the part of the fund" regarding Telstra's separation.

The fund was a government-owned investment body established in 2006 to meet the cost of public sector superannuation liabilities.

"We will continue to work as a shareholder, working with the company, seeking information from the company," Costello said. The CEO made his comments while being questioned at a Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration yesterday.

Facing earlier questions, Costello conceded that the threat of Telstra's separation "would be a major risk for an investment", but when pressed if he hypothetically would buy shares of a company facing the legislation that Telstra was, he said it would depend on the price of the shares.

Costello said the Future Fund had not had discussions with the government about the legislation forcing Telstra's separation because the fund was set up to operate independently. "It seems to us completely inappropriate to insert ourselves into a discussion," said Costello.

"We took a view that we absolutely should not be involved in being part of discussions with government," he said. "Any approach like that would certainly have been at risk of receiving inside trading information."

Costello said it was a coincidence the fund had sold a third of its stake prior to the announcement.

The Future Fund had taken on Telstra shares in 2007 during the final sell off of the telco, which were held in escrow until August 2008. Its massive sell off took place one month prior to the government's announcement, reducing its ownership of Telstra from 16 per cent to 11 per cent.

Asked whether he knew about the separation deal and whether it was the basis for the Future Fund's decision, Costello said "it absolutely was a coincidence". He went on to argue that it was obvious it might happen — the question was when.

Costello also took a question on notice about when and how often he had spoken to Telstra prior to the sale but clarified "it was some significant time before the transaction we undertook".

Future Fund chair David Murray on Monday said in a statement that its Telstra sell off was a "long-stated intention". The value of its Telstra holdings was around $4.3 billion.

Advertisement

Talkback 22 comments

    Not true Aussies. Anonymous -- 21/10/09

    Well what absolute, complete and total hypocrisy that the Future Fund speaks. They were not hesitant to demand that the Telstra Board got rid of Sol Trujillo under advice from the Government.

    Now when the Government blackmail of Telstra will have a serious harmful effect on the Future Fund investment and to remain sycophantic to Government they keep silent. How gutless.

    Blah Anonymous -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389155)

    Fanboi, as one of your dopey mates, probably you, has said -

    *Your obsession with Sol is becoming boring...time to move on*

    Blah Blah Blah RS -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389168)

    More one way traffic, from you know who.

    What happened to fair go Vasso Massonic -- 21/10/09

    It was most gracious of the Future Fund to acknowledge that the Rudd government's plan to break up Telstra Corporation Ltd posed a significant risk for the telco's shares. (http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Australian-fund-sees-risks-to-Telstra-shares-WZ7M6?OpenDocument) But it should be noted that the Fund's intervention into the company's affairs brought about the share value rut that was hard to escape.

    The Fund is said to be assessing a range of potential outcomes for its Telstra holding. One would assume that the honourable thing to do is cancel sufficient Telstra shares to legitimise the overpriced T2 tranche at $7.40

    Broken record Vasso RS -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389179)

    Vasso, how hard is it to understand, people who aren't direct Telstra shareholders, DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR SHARES & THEIR VALUE!

    Whether they fall to $1 or jump to $10, no one cares. If they jump to $5 tomorrow, great, perhaps you whining, Telstra puppets will shut up about YOU and YOUR shares and we can get on with the important issue, Australia's Communications, unfettered by your GREED.

    I know you, Sydney and Mike believe Aust's comms should revolve around your portfolios BUT THEY DO NOT.

    Average Australians want what is best for Australia's telecommunications, AT LAST, because they have been strangled by your wonderful [sic] Telstra.

    Just like no one cared about Oz Minerals share value, when the government refused to let the Chinese buy them with Prominent Hill, which could have meant complete collapse and shareholders losing everything.

    Just like no one cared when Shell wanted to buy Woodside and their shareholders could have made a fortune on the sale.

    Just like no one cared about One Tel or HiH shareholders, losing everything.

    NO ONE CARES.

    As for your ridiculous comment about cancelling shares. T2 was floated when we had a tech boom. So should ERG shareholders who paid $12 get special compensation because when they were last listed on the ASX they were worth only $0.005 (yes half a cent) or Keycorp or Solution 6 or Looksmart shareholders all get special privelidges?

    Oh that's right, Mr. Howard enticed you, so it justifies your stupidity according to you, lol!

    People invest in the stock market knowing the risks. So BAD LUCK. And just to reaffirm it was very clear to Telstra shareholders, here's a link to your other bible, the AFR -

    15/10/2009 - AFR pg 14..."Telstra investors have been warned that the regulation of the Telco could change. Peter Harris, the secretary of the Department of Broadband, Communications & the Digital Economy, said that the three Telstra prospectuses included warnings about possible changes in regulation"!

    My, what a bout of verbal diarrhea Vasso Massonic -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389187)

    Frustration of not being able to peddle your wares where the real action is:

    http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/home/conversation

    Over and out.

    Schools in AGAIN (remember ex-div, lol) RS -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389193)

    Vasso, from InvestorWords.com

    "Investor (in.ves'tor - n) - An individual who commits money to investment products with the expectation of financial return... Generally, the primary concern of an investor is to minimize risk while maximizing return as opposed to a speculator, who is willing to accept a higher level of risk in the hopes of collecting higher-than-average profits"....

    So you and your other two greedy Telstra shareholder mates, having bought in at up to $8 - now $3.19, obviously aren't investors, you are speculators...

    and not very good ones at that.

    Don't deny Australia RS! Anonymous -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389197)

    RS, I do know and understand that it is difficult for you to comprehend the fact that the whole world does not attitudinaly function of the worship of the dollar.

    Take my dad, he volunteered at 19 years of age to fight on the fields of Flanders for King and Country. No Shares involved RS, simply a feeling of what was right.

    So it is with Telstra, we see a Government using blackmail and threat to force a competitor into submission and accede to domination by an oppressor.

    I am sure that when Australians are presented with the facts of this Rudd smoke and mirror deception they will be in full agreement with Vasso and the masses of other Australians who reject this socialist horror.

    Good man. RS -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389204)

    Your father sounds like a very good man Sydney.

    I bet he'd be ashamed of you, selling out the way you have.

    what masses ??? Salami Chujillo -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389204)

    what masses of other Australians? I can only see a bunch of greedy TLS shareholders who refuses to acknowledge that Telstra is an infrastructure monopoly and doesn't want a level playing field. The NBN is a wholesale only company, unlike Telstra and will only look after all of Australia's intrests not just Telstra and the greedy and selfish shareholders. God bless the NBN and Conroy, also please bless Vasso and Sydney's shares as well, just this once, cuz they're too greedy.

    what masses, obviously - Anonymous -- 21/10/09 (in reply to #320389221)

    there's the little woman, vasso, mike, steve the telstra employee, ceo david, rod and craig from nwat, those other telstra managers i dunno the names of, the guy who said he'd go to canberra with me and sol, phil and greg {no wait, there mexicans, I mean Americans}

    see like i said masses.

    almost enough to fill my already half full corolla. no, no, what i meant to say was, my good aussie, true blue, beep beep barina.

    With the icing, ILUVTLS personal no. plates.

    .........what masses, obviously - Anonymous -- 28/10/09 (in reply to #320389226)

    I'll bet your only mode of transport is a skateboard.

    Schools out AGAIN (remember ex-div, lol) Anonymous -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389197)

    I wish you would make up your mind, on exactly how much these greedy Telstra shareholders paid. Now it's $ 8 per share. OMG you are a goose.

    $8 sydney mike -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389306)

    you paid $8 because you are the silliest of the dopey telstra shareholders.

    re $8 Anonymous -- 27/10/09 (in reply to #320389317)

    You haven't got a clue, bird brain. I would really like to know, what it is you suffer from, as I might even be tempted to make a donation towards whatever organization treats your disorder. It certainly must be a very unpleasant affliction, to have to live with.

    Telstra Share Holders Anonymous -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389187)

    I am a Telstra Share holder and I strongly believe that best thing for Australia is for Telstra to be split. I know its not ideal for the share price but really its a small price to pay for long term productivity gains that could be gained for all of Australia.

    Beautiful Dreamer. Anonymous -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389256)

    Yes Anonymous let's all stand around, hold hands, and sing the praises of the time when the NBN will deliver cheaper services to every Australian.

    Let's dream further to the time when the $43 billion runs low and the NBN calls for more finance. Or to the time when for a reasonable ROI the price of NBN service must skyrocket.

    Lets feel for all the Telstra opponents who called for Telstra destruction, when they realise that the monopoly NBN has wrecked their business also.

    Don't worry overly though these visions probably wont come to pass for at least twenty years, if ever.

    re Telstra Share Holders Anonymous -- 22/10/09 (in reply to #320389256)

    How dare you make such a statement. You are a Telstra shareholder. Don't you realize that you can only be a Telstra shareholder if you are driven by greed. (Please refer to that constant anti-Telstra commentator, who continues to post his spite ridden nonsense on a daily basis) Does not sound to me, that you should be allowed to hold Telstra shares, with anything like the unselfish statement, you just made.

    Future Fund agrees with you Simon -- 28/10/09 (in reply to #320389256)

    Why are the FF tight lipped on this issue? My understanding is that they believe that structural separation of Telstra will increase shareholder return, as it has with BT and others. Certainly David Murray is of that opinion.

    re Future Fund agrees with you Howards End -- 28/10/09 (in reply to #320389900)

    Which is why they were not tipped off, prior to the Govt. handing Telstra an ultimatum, right. And if that is the case, why did the FF sell at the price they did. Are they against having an increase in there shareholding funds. Not a very believable story, is it ?

    new-in old-loser Anonymous -- 28/10/09 (in reply to #320389907)

    another new name mike oldloser, ha

    re new-in old-loser Howards End -- 29/10/09 (in reply to #320389917)

    If you say so.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Welcome to National Censorship Day
    Conroy's blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon Net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian Internet.
  • Array That sinking Tcard feeling
    There's something terribly unsettling about realising that the NSW Government is considering hiring a company to build a new electronic ticketing system which has already put it through the legal wringer for the system's predecessor.
  • Array The challenge of government 2.0
    The Government 2.0 Taskforce released its draft report last week, and its recommendations for Open Government almost reads like a manifesto. Stilgherrian's guest on Patch Monday this week is the chair of the Taskforce, Nicholas Gruen.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured