Foreign firm given leg up in broadband rollout: Telstra

By AAP
19 June 2007 08:55 AM
Tags: broadband, telstra, optus, fttn, elders, fibre-to-the-node, service, bush

Our content licensing agreement with AAP stipulates that the material must be taken down 30 days from the date of publication. Therefore this particular story, having exceeded that time frame, has expired. We apologise for any inconvenience.

AAP

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    The moral of the story is: Anonymous -- 19/06/07

    Do not trust Telstra, I much prefercthe optus deal, Telstra isn't even Australian though! It's american, and who really trusts america these day? I put my trust in Singapore.

    Poor Sol Anonymous -- 19/06/07

    When will the American who is running Telstra realise that Australia is NOT the US? So what if Optus is foreign-owned? I bet he wouldn't be saying that if Optus was US-owned. Further, Optus has been running ALL of Australia's satellites [inc. defence satellites] for over a decade.
    Its time Sol realised that using his American tactics and antics, simply do not wash here in Australia.
    Optus/Elders won purely for two reasons - offering a fair deal to ALL telcos, and a cheaper pricing.
    Live with it Sol! Or Leave.

    broadband Anonymous -- 19/06/07

    telstra have had eternity to provide real broadband and it has never come close. even those of us who have broadband are stuck with slow speeds. i'm glad that we're giving another company a go at it.

    Sol thinks we're a rollover downunder Anonymous -- 19/06/07

    So - Sol thinks that WiFi is unproven. Maybe it is indeed on the cusp, but it's being driven by a far better company (Intel) than Sol could ever drive.

    I do wish that we could get rid of Sol and his American cronies and get some good Aus common sense back here.

    Rather foreign owned than Telstra Charles -- 20/06/07

    Of course it would be nice if a 100% Australian company was doing it, but seeing as Telstra has proven time and time again that it can't be trusted, I'd much rather Optus.

    Example - Telstra has been screwing Tasmania on the cost of Bass Strait transit for years - charging more for it than for Sydney-Tokyo traffic. When ISPs brought this up, they could have re-thought their pricing and offered something more affordable - but no, they decided to be arrogant and keeping on shafting Tasmania. Now OPEL is creating an alternate backhaul solution for Tasmania.

    Telstra have brought this on themselves. If Telstra didn't give people so many great reasons to NOT use them, there wouldn't be a need for others to create alternatives.

    IT'S TIME TO CUT TELSTRA LOOSE Anonymous -- 21/06/07

    My 1st experience with Telstra's monopolistic attitude was back in the 80's when they told me to wait 6-12 months for a phone service. Over the years I took up competitors services as deregulation happened.

    Telstra won me back once, only to screw it up with gross beaurecratic bungling.

    Now, all I see from Telstra is government bullying and a disgraceful IR record (ABC Four Corners). I think that the government's plan is the ideal opportunity to cut Telstra and their crumbling infrastructure loose. Australia needs forward looking, competitive and responsive telcos.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured