Crocodile interrupts Telstra operation

Over the last two days, Telstra has temporarily fixed a cable cut in the Kimberley region in an operation involving a C130 Hercules and a baby crocodile.

(Credit: Telstra)

The Logue River, 60 kilometres from Derby in Western Australia, broke its banks early Sunday morning. As the waters ran out, debris damaged a cable, cutting service to 4,300 landlines, 2,000 ADSL connections and 12 mobile base stations.

A Telstra team was soon on the scene with 5km of fibre, a spokesperson said, but realised that more would be needed since the access points (which would normally have been tapped for the repair) were submerged. The 15km flood front meant 17km of cable would be needed, an amount only available in major centres.

Telstra considered sending the drums of cable in on a truck, but ruled it out since the journey would take two to three days. It then looked at sending the drums, 2.2 tonnes and three metres high, via a commercial airline, but there wasn't availability on the Sunday evening.

The Federal Attorney General's office came to the rescue, organising the use of an RAAF C130 Hercules for the job. With four of the drums of cable on-board, the aircraft lifted from RAAF Pearce, 80km north of Perth, at 11:00am Monday to arrive at RAAF Curtin, a base near Derby, at 5:00pm.

During this time, Telstra employees had also been working on the ground to patch lines as best they could, rerouting via the Northern Territory. By the time the aircraft landed, they had almost patched 3,000 landlines and enabled some mobile data services to come back on line such as EFTPOS and remote alarm facilities for the fire brigade.

A forklift and truck met the Hercules to transport the cable to the site. Although a lot of the area was submerged, a road reserve was still dry. Telstra decided to run the cable along the reserve in a temporary fix until the waters subsided. The team rolled the four 4.5km lengths of cable out and began the joining process.

The process was safely carried out, a spokesperson for Telstra said, and mainly on dry ground, but that didn't stop some workers encountering a three-foot crocodile, drawn to the floodlights.

"He just rocked up to see what the fuss was about," the spokesperson said, adding that a few crocodiles had likely been flooded out of the catchment. "They just shooed it back into the water."

The repairs went on. The strands of the cables were not joined indiscriminately, with emergency services receiving top priority. By 1:30am, all those were back on line. By 5:00 this morning, all services were up and running.

The flood waters were expected to peak tomorrow. When the level comes down, the workers will work on a permanent fix to the cable break.

Carousel image by Kevin Walsh, royalty free.

Advertisement

Talkback 66 comments

    hats off to telstra workers tim Miller www.spyjournal.biz -- 03/02/09

    well done on getting that fixed guys - some times we lay crap on telstra but you guys rock!

    Hats off Tailgator -- 03/02/09

    Couldn't agree more. Though it hardly merits the space and it's a shame it reads like something from Telstra's PR dept.
    Hard time meeting the deadline Suzanne ??

    Well done RAAF Mel Sommersberg -- 03/02/09

    It was the RAAF that came to the rescue on this occasion but Telstra played their part as they should.

    Very good job for the workers! Not for managers! Anonymous -- 03/02/09

    It's great to see the bottom line workers doing an excellent job with limited resources as usual.

    However, were they all paid overtime rates? Did they do the job by choice? Or were they forced to do the overtime and be away from the family because their job was on the line?

    The company goes above and beyond where it suits. Pity they have to also screw over their workers by refusing to negotiate union enterprise agreements and are trying to get many staff onto a non-union agreement for the company benefit.

    They forget that jobs like this one only get done by the bottom line. Telstra is lucky that the staff doing this job are still doing the right thing for customers!

    The interesting part (not in this story), is just how many managers and pseudo managers with their bums on seats were involved in scheduling and ringing people up or organising a C130 aircraft, compared to the number of workers involved actually doing the repair job. The ratio is probably 4:1 or even 10:1 in Telstra.

    It's good to see that the company has very good news sometimes. It's a pity that underneath it all there's usually another story.

    re Very good job for the workers! Not for managers! Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122201)

    What a pathetic response to a good story, from some ignoramus that simply wanted to undermine what happened, and turn it into a negative Anti Telstra Management bash. Congratulations to the Telstra workers that got the job done so welI, but I would like to know why this moron simply assumes that "managers and pseudo managers with their bums on seats" were not a part of the successful operation that took place. All I can say to the anonymous person who sent in those negative comments is - Get a life mate !

    your not too bright Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122229)

    anyone who used the work ignoramus is so far up is own backside that they cant see daylight... the C130 was actaully organised by everyday techs as it was done in the middle of the night and the only involvement management had was to sign of on the payment to the RAAF. You have no idea how Telstra operates Sydney Mike and it's quite obvious what you do know is from press released, which are far from the truth. I think your the one that needs to get a life. Good on the Telstra workers for a great job in the middle of industrial action. It shows who the real heroes are. Telstra workers comprmise to get the job done. Telstra managers do not.

    re your not too bright Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122256)

    The Oxford Dictionary descibes an ignoramus, as " an ignorant person " which to my way of thinking fits you to a tee, mate. As I said before, go and Get a Life. Your ignorant and negative input was aload of crap. It's no wonder you remain anonymous !

    @re not too bright Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122288)

    The slang dictionary describes a masturbationalist "as a person who finds that **** is the answer to all problems in the world".

    This fits you to a tee, Sydney maaaaate.

    your not too bright Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122256)

    So what would have happened if management had not signed off on payment to the RAAF, Mr Brightspark.

    where do you work? Anonymous -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122292)

    Sydney, do you even work for Telstra? For someone with a big mouth like you, your lack of knowledge on Telstra business principles and operations as they are executed and not written, astounds me. It's management with principles like yours which a bringing this once great company to its knees. The sooner we get rid of people like you, the sooner we can get Telstra back to serving customer and not dollars. Without satisified customers there is NO dollars.

    Probably for Optus? Anonymous -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122392)

    Sydney Mike previously said that he does *not* work for Telstra and then admitted that while he's a Telstra shareholder, he's actually an *Optus customer*.

    The only reason he comments here is because he's bitter about his Telstra portfolio's worthlessness, but every month, sends payment to Telstra's main competitor, rofl.

    Gee Sydney, I wonder if Sol is an Optus customer too?

    Very good job for the workers! Not for managers! Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122201)

    Ok, what branch of the CEPU are you from...come on fess-up. The staff up North do a stirling job under extreme conditions and I doubt they've seen a bloody union rep for years.

    job under extreme conditions... Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122232)

    they'd probably need some union rep if their having to work under extreme conditions, you know, to stop telstra shoving its firey hot poker up their backsides to work harder or else...

    job under extreme conditions... Ardent -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122247)

    Sounds to me like you are afraid of doing a days work for a days pay with that leftard unionist comment...bludger.

    No respect from Telstra Anonymous -- 03/02/09

    These are the talent an skills getting pushed out of the company. It's a bit like the story of the plane that landed safely on the Hudson River recently, turns out that every single person from the pilot to the port authority workers who rescued people from the river were union members. Telstra workers are responding to disasters like this even when they are on strike. They are effectively prolonging the dispute and losing more money because they do not want people left without at least a basic phone service. Good on the Telstra workers, but not to the company-you should treat these workers with the respect they deserve & you should respect their right to have a union negotiated agreement.

    No respect from Telstra Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122216)

    Wow what an earth shattering piece of intelligence you showed there, by referring to the Hudson River incident. Were you one of the passengers ?

    Diversion with a crocodile Anonymous -- 04/02/09

    What a pile! Did Sol T write this, seriously it reads like an infomercial, I do not respond to news stories as a general rule but this was offensive. Zdnet..... Very disappointed 8^(

    Diversion with a crocodile Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122228)

    Why bother writing in then. Obviously all you ever want to hear is the continuous negative crap. We are so disappointed that you are very disappointed, you poor little woose. But keep watching, as something really nasty for Telstra is sure to come along soon, that will cheer you up.

    Diversion with a crocodile Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122231)

    Sorry, was it too much to ask for a quality article.
    My bad.

    News etc Renai LeMay -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122228)

    We've got plenty of news of the hard-hitting variety ;) Just look at our coverage of the job cuts!

    But we liked this story, as some of the other readers said, even though a lot of people don't like Telstra, and the company has made mistakes, there are still a lot of great people there doing good work, and this too deserves to be highlighted :)

    We are, after all, impartial.

    Cheers,

    Renai LeMay
    News Editor
    ZDNet.com.au

    News etc Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122238)

    Good impartial response Renai. We shall now wait with bated breath, for the anonymous crap which is sure to follow, from the simple minded anti Telstra brigade. (Hellooo Joe, Jason etc.,.)

    Well done Telstra!! Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122251)

    Well done Telstra!!! Lets hope the so called "expert panel" take note...and Conroy for that matter as to the importance of a strong nation Carrier!!

    Invokes the "true Australian" spirit. Telstra simply has to be a part of the NBN.

    Right from the early days when Todd overcome adversity with the overland Telegraph line, this country needs a strong national carrier.

    re Well done Telstra!! Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122258)

    Well said mate. It is a pity there isn't more positives being aired here about Telstra. They might even be prepared to take a bit of notice, if all the anti Telstra prattle would quieten down a bit. I'll bet that anonymous dill, that gave us the story of the plane that went down in the Hudson River being full of union members, must be really proud of the fact that they are all now whinging because all the airline has given them is a measly $ 8,000 handout (plus bonuses), for something that was absolutely no fault of the airline. Some people never stop howling, and he and his mate Joe (if it is not the same person) is a prime example.

    Anti stupidity Jason -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122251)

    Well done Sydney Mike, as usual you are too stupid to understand what a person is relaying to you.

    When did I say I am anti Telstra? Never. What I did say was, Telstra shares in general have been a disaster for their shareholders, like you, which got you slobbering, spitting and in general clamouring to reply. I was just saying the truth and stuff that everyone (well almost everyone) knows anyway.

    From that, your feeble little mind somehow equates that I am the anti Telstra Brigade? But yet you still fail to understand the irony of you supporting Telstra, but being an Optus customer simultaneously?

    But let's not start that again, my head still hurts from banging it against the brick wall, by trying to get one so inane as you, to understand last time.

    Surely, the fact that I criticise you for being a Telstra supporter/Optus customer should tell you something?

    But I will certainly admit to being anti-stupid comments or in other words anti Sydney Mike. It is your ridiculous comments and bull***t, which makes me respond, not the pro Telstra sentiment.

    So well done Telstra and as usual, full marks for complete cretinism Sydney Mike.

    re Anti stupidity Sydney Mike -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122267)

    I know I said I would not reply to you Jason, but your non humorous crap, is quite titillating, so I couldn't resist a response. Keep it up mate, it obviously helps you get your rocks off !!! Incidently I read with interest that Real Estate in the Eastern Suburbs has dropped 14% recently. Funny how you insist on telling us that you quadrupled you money. What did you buy, a repossessed caravan, from a caravan park on the water's edge ?

    Again, do the sums. Jason -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122291)

    Yes my property quadrupled (initial outlay +300%) and has now come back 14% over the last few months (or about the same as Telstra shares came down in just one day when they were expelled from the NBN).

    So I am now only up a mere 286%. Damn.

    This means my so called caravans, crapper seat, is worth more than your portfolio!

    I'd ask you to swap, only the toilet seat is a better investment, I'm sure most would agree. Even Dr. Burgess, who said he wouldn't recommend investing in Telstra shares, to his mother.

    But do you know what? I bet Mrs Burgess Snr has invested in a toilet seat, hahahahahaha

    Again, do the sums. Anonymous -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122299)

    Congratulations Jason. You must be think you are the Master of the Universe ? (Ho Ho Ho)

    Again, do the sums Sydney Mike -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122299)

    OK smartase, I have done the sums. Initial outlay for a used caravan @ $ 750 + 300% = $ 3000. Hardly a kings ransom Mr Know it all. I use these figures, in the same way you stupidly assume what price, and how many shares I own in Telstra. In other words knucklehead, you wouldn't have a clue. Go sit on your toilet seat, and continue to produce more idiotic crap, as you always do.

    Again do the sums, but this time without the lies and childish bull***t. Jason -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122331)

    Sydney Muck, I assume you meant smart*rse... dumb***k?

    Obviously, you have now told so many blatant lies here, that you have lost track of them all. You say to me that I "stupidly assume what price you paid [for your Telstra shares]".

    Wrong, here's what you said, ZD 11/1 - "I bought Telstra in the very beginning"... How convenient, in almost 12 years of being available, you claim to have purchased them all at their lowest point ever, 1997/$3.30 - REMEMBER these lies, now?

    So I am assuming nothing brainiac, I am simply using your obvious lies (so obvious, you even forgot your own lies) as exhibit A. Personally, I reckon you paid about $5 - $5.50 per share, but I'll go along with the little charade. Plus I told you previously, exactly how much I paid too for my property, $248,500, you dumb***k.

    Honestly, I have corresponded with some lying, **it for brains, tossers in the past, but my friend, you beat [pun intended] them hands down.

    Try to get it through that obviously sloth like skull of yours, that *you have lost your money, gambling your family's future on Telstra shares* and no amount of ZDNet lies or moronic jibber-jabber, name calling, no amount of 14c dividends [unless you live to be 700] and no amount of jealousy because I have a property worth 286% [300% - your 14%] more than I initially paid, will bring back your lost Telstra share money, loser. I know it, you know it and everyone else knows it dumb***k. You are fooling no one but yourself with your *obvious lies*.

    Laughterbating furiously at you, an investment god, a Telstra shareholder [and an OPTUS CUSTOMER}....

    Again do the sums, but this time without the lies and childish bull***t. Sydney Mike -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122368)

    Three cheers for Jason, Australia's greatest investor !!! (When do they let you out, knucklehead)

    Consistency Jason -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122369)

    As usual no adult reply, rational debate, single fact or anything even remotely intelligent, about you or your comment Sydney Mike.

    At least you are consistent.

    So to make you feel at home, please allow me...

    Three cheers for Sydney, Australia's poorest and stupidest, dumb***k investor.

    Consistency Sydney Mike -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122370)

    And another three cheers for the only man who reckons he has trebled his outlay in the Eastern Suburbs, but over how many years we don't know. If it was in recent years, to have paid $ 248,500, and now be three times that much better off, you must have "stolen" it off one of your demented relations, who had no idea of it's worth. I used to sell Real Estate in the Randwick area, so I have a reasonable idea of values within a fairly wide radius of it, and I reckon you are just a lying little turd trying to big note yourself. Get a life, you dill !!!!

    OMG Jason -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122439)

    OMG, I am corresponding with the stupidest man on earth. Please let me again repeat what I said 4/2 -

    Well done Sydney Mike, as usual you are too stupid to understand what a person is relaying to you.

    You are an absolute c**k. When did I say I bought it recently, you ***king moron?

    We were talking about the longterm investment of your worthless Telstra shares, which you bought for $3.30 in 1997 (NOT - hahahahahahahaha) and my property, which for your information, I bought in 1995.

    I know your next intelligent comment idiot, you paid too much. Yeah whatever. My investment has quadrupled and yours has gone backwards, say whay you like, lie and lie, as you have done, but that's the way it is.

    If you do sell real estate and you bought Telstra shares instead, remind me never to buy property from you you ***king di**head.

    Woolies versus Telstra MkII Mr Woolies -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122457)

    Hi Jason and Sydney Mike, remember me? I did a comparison of Telstra and Woolies shares a few weeks ago and have been dubbed Mr. Woolies. So Mr. Woolies it will be.

    When I commented previously, which was my first comment here, instead of Sydney either agreeing with me, or as Jason says, rationally debating otherwise, Sydney aimlessly and undeservedly, name called instead. I must admit the adolescent coarseness of his inept replies caught me unawares, as I was just doing a simple comparison and not trying to degrade anyone or anything. So I simply did the same to Sydney in reply.

    But seriously, I have just tuned in again and can't believe you are still carrying on with such crap, arguing against reality Sydney. You have shown yourself to be an irrational, shallow and bitter man, by continuing to grasp at straws. Just let it go, you are in the red big time, but over time, your shares will recover, just chill.

    So without wishing to start more crassness, which may prove inevitable considering who I am conversing with; here's an update on my Telstra and Woolies comparison.

    At the time of my first comparison, Telstra shares were $3.76. Today they are $3.71, -5c in about 4 weeks. Whereas Woolies were $25.72. Today they are $27.95, +$2.23 in 4 weeks.

    What do they say about the proof of the pudding? Keep arguing as you seem to, if you like Sydney, but again this is reality.

    Since my last comparison, Telstra shares have gone backwards further, albeit only marginally, but are only some 40c off all time lows and 35c off, 12 monthly lows. While Woolies shares are again picking up nicely and quickly heading north towards their $30.97 all time highs and well off their $22.85, 12 monthly lows.

    Sydney I look forward to one of your typically non-witty retorts. Idiocy along the lines of, I gedda dividend, ***k you knucklehead, or something equally as grammatically challenging, intelligent and awe inspiring!

    Jason, $248,500 for a Bugatti Veyron caravan, sounds like a bargain (lol)?

    Woolies versus Telstra MkII Sydney Mike -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122464)

    Well once again it would appear they have left the back door of the asylum open, and Jason's little brother has gone walkabout. Wondered where he had got to. However let me simply inform you pair of king sized f..king knuckleheads, and I am sure you will be bitterly disappointed to hear it, that so far I have not lost a bean on my Telstra shares. I have had no need, nor do I have any intention of selling them in the near future, and a 14% per annum, fully franked dividend, is fine by mean. So go back to your dilapidated caravan, and rack your empty heads together, and shatter us with some more of your amazing and mind bending hypothetical crap. That is something that you most certainly both excel at. You idiots !!!

    I feel pity for you. Mr Woolies -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122474)

    Sydney.

    You are also a disgraceful and pitiful excuse for a human being.

    But believe it or not, even after your little above tantrum and typical idiotic name calling (rather than including actual fact or substance) I feel no anger towards you at all.

    Rather, I feel very sorry for you, as it's obviously not your fault. Unfortunately in nature, some like you are born a little abnormally. It is cruel I know, but..

    As far as the Telstra dividend is concerned, Jason, you are correct. It is 14c per share, not (even close to) 14%.

    Telstra shares finished today at $3.71. So if the dividend was payable today it would be 14c for every $3.71 share, which equates to 3.77358%.

    Sydney, it doesn't matter how many times you call me a knucklehead, f..kwit or whatever, the end result is the same and those who can see clearly understand this.

    But for those like you, whom nature has unkindly robbed their rationale and intelligence, I know it must be difficult to understand and even harder to accept.

    I feel pity for you Sydney Mike -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122480)

    Your bitter reaction is hilarious. Suggest you and your f..kwit mate Jason, go and get a life you pair of pathetically twisted knuckleheads.

    I pity you too, even more so, after this pitiful comment Jason -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122600)

    Sydney! Due to your psychiatric shortfall, I'll keep it simple to try to, somehow, explain it yet again.

    Firstly I note that you did say before you wouldn't correspond with me further but immediately did so and have continued to do so. So your credibility and honesty is non existent.

    Secondly, you aren't man enough to even admit, hey I calculated 14% not 14c per share, *that was foolish and admit you were WRONG*. No instead you hide behind more stupidity and name calling, what an approach you have. You ***ked up, now be man enough to admit it. But I won't hold my breath, immature and insecure little boy.

    We are talking about investment *growth*. You know growth? Just like when you put Mr wee wee in your hand (which you obviously do 24/7) and he gets bigger. Now if you possible (I know it's difficult for you) leave Mr wee wee alone just for one second.. Same with Investment growth, it's simply, how much the investment has *grown in value*.

    *Initial cost vs. current value = growth*! Simple! What you and I originally paid for our investments vs. what our investments are currently worth*! It has nothing to do with any income we receive.

    You are currently looking at the growth of my investment only vs. both growth and income (dividend) of your investment. Not really apples and apples Sydney. So if you wish to bring income into it and include that magic 14c (or was that 14% haha) dividend into calculation, as well as growth, fine! I will then bring my income, *the weekly rent I receive*, into the equation too. BTW, just like my rent wasn't always as much as it is now, your 14c (not 14% haha) dividend hasn't always been 14c (not 14% haha). Back in '98 it was only 7c and has increase steadily since.

    To summarise, Telstra shares have gone from T1 $3.30 to $3.71 (yesterday) in 12 years, *up just 12.5%*. Although as we know, the vast majority of Telstra investors have bought in at *much higher levels*, including T2 investors who paid $7.40!

    My property was $248,500 and according to you is now worth $886,000, 14% (a figure you strangely seem fixated to, haha) down from the $1m it was worth about 12 months ago, but still *up 256.5%* in 14 (that magic number again) years. Now add you 14c (not 14% haha) dividend and I'll add my rent and guess what?

    As Bullwinkle said *hey presto, nothin' up my sleeve*.

    I pity you too, even more so, after this pitiful comment Sydney Mike -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122606)

    I thought you were just a crazy demented ******* Jason, but you reference to Mr Wee Wee, makes me now suspect that you are also a deranged **********. Come on you imbecilic moron, show us how much lower you can get, you dead set low life little turd !!!

    Priceless. Jason -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122710)

    Dangle and wiggle that string AND YOU REPLY AGAIN, AS I KNEW YOU WOULD, hahahahahahahaha. This is funnier than watching *stepbrothers*

    I see you have resorted to calling me a ******** ***********, priceless. Hahahahahahahahaha. Still won't put food on your table, because you lost your money, TARD. Again, you do deserve pity.

    So as I promised I would continue to do and as you wish, now 102* times and counting: -

    HEAR YE, HEAR YE - SYDNEY MIKE (Optus customer/Mr 14%) LOST HIS FAMILY'S LIFE SAVINGS BY STUPIDLY INVESTING IN TELSTRA SHARES.

    Be hearing from you soon, little sheep, dumb***k.

    Cya Mikey boy, because of your stupidity, I hope you enjoy poverty. Mr Woolies -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122600)

    Sydney Mike, I have corresponded with you now on 4 or 5 occassions, some 4 weeks ago and again over the last couple of days and your ignorance never fails to amaze.

    During these chats, not once have you said anything worthwhile. Just childish name calling, lies about your Telstra shares and elementary mistakes regarding the facts, but more importantly elementary mistakes regarding the figures. The 14% dividend, which should of course be 14c per share dividend, displaying your complete lack of any understanding at all, of the situation.

    How embarrassing, that you have to forever go into defence and cover up mode and talk more rot, because of your lack of intelligence. Yes you really meant to make that rudimentary mistake 14%. Everyone witnessed your stupidity in all its glory there. lol.

    But following our initial correspondence, which again was my first comment here, and your ridiculous reply (what a surprise), not wishing to be put off by crass idiocy in reply to my first comment, I just did what you do Mikey and returned fire, being the one who first christened you, dumb***k.

    No need to thank me Mikey wikey, believe me, you deserve it.

    Actually to be precise I "fittingly christened you" "a loud mouthed, easily excited, half-witted, dumb***k, buffoon loser, ***king dunce, Telstra shareholder".

    Dumb***k for short, thanks Jason.

    Since then I have discovered why you are as crass, bitter and ridiculous as you are.

    1. Because you were born "challenged". Which isn't your fault and I pity you for.
    2. Because "you" have lost your families entire life savings on Telstra equities.

    And you call me and Jason bitter, when we, unlike you, were born with full facilties, haven't lost our families life savings and simply because we try to help, by explaining the situation to one so inane as you, lol.

    So over these last 4 weeks I have not only reaffirmed my first thoughts of you, as you are indeed all of these things I first called you ( "a loud mouthed, easily excited, half-witted, dumb***k, buffoon loser, ***king dunce, Telstra shareholder"), but a whole lot more too, lmao.

    Goodbye idiot Sydney Mikey wikey boy, I hope because of your stupidity, you and your family enjoy poverty. At least you'll be able to eat twice a year when the 14%, oh dear me, sorry, 14c dividends are paid. lmfao.

    Cya Mikey boy, because of your stupidity, I hope you enjoy poverty. Sydney Mike -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122702)

    Ha Ha Ha !!! Just like your *******, ********** mate Jason, you sure use a lot of editorial space, to air your never ending crap. But keep it up mate, I know how important it is to you pair of knuckleheads, and it certainly keeps me laughing at the both of you !

    Bigotted homophobe. Justin Greenefield -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122711)

    I don't care about your stupid brinkmanship with Jason Sydney Mike, but as for calling someone a ******* and deeming it as deragatory, well enough is enough.

    As a gay male who has been subjected to ridicule for many years, your comments are those of a past homophobic generation we hoped were dead and buried.

    Your vengeful comments are nothing more than bigotted and hateful and I find you and your comments most offensive and will be reporting you.

    You disgust me Sydney Mike, you should be ashamed of yourself, grow up and don't use such terms, just because you have lost an argument and do not know where to turn next.

    Bigotted homophobe. Anonymous -- 09/02/09 (in reply to #320122720)

    You would have every right to complain, had I hurled the abuse at you Justin, but they weren't. How vengeful bitter and full of hatred do you think those comments are, that are being hurled at me, from those other two knuckleheads. Eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth I say !

    Mr N Justin Greenefield -- 09/02/09 (in reply to #320122781)

    You reap what you sow Mr N and I have noticed that you always sow cheap personal remarks, so what do you expect to reap in return?

    By all means stick up for yourself, but do it with a little dignity and without alienating others. It's not an eye for an eye or tooth for a tooth, when you hurt or offend others who are not involved.

    Yes these other two knuckleheads, see what I mean about sowing and reaping, have said mean things to you, and although I do not condone what they have said, they have made total sense in their analysis. They then revved you up, but without "crossing the line you crossed", by using overly offensive references to others.

    They have made you react...and looking at the kitten remark, that was their whole intention. So in hindsight, perhaps you shouldn't have bitten, as they have been very successful at accomplishing their goals.

    Mr Newin, today there are certain areas which have to do withy race, creed, colour and sexuality which are strictly taboo. So a fracas between you and others, who are just revving you to boiling point, is not the place to vent your personal hatred towards the gay community.

    This hatred is most evident in your negative tone towards us, if you believe calling someone a poofter is more degrading than being called a Dumb---- or halfwit, Mr N.

    I hope you can understand my point of view, without wanting to get into yet another fracas, this time with me, and then resorting to more sowing?

    Mr N again Juz -- 09/02/09 (in reply to #320122788)

    I have just posted my reply and noticed that your offensive remarks have now been removed. Even in places where they were simply repeated.

    Obviously I'm not the only one who thought that you "crossed the line". Mr N.

    And again Mr N Juz -- 09/02/09 (in reply to #320122789)

    Your name was also omitted:changed to anonymous also, after submission?

    @bigotted homophobe Jason -- 09/02/09 (in reply to #320122781)

    Sydney Mike, I was going to hold my tongue but then thought why?

    Firstly my apologies to Justin for my part in all of this. After all I was the one fuelling the village idiot that is Sydney Mike.

    I was just having a little fun with your volatility (much like your shares) Sydney Mike. But I agree with Justin about sow/reap. This all started here and went downhill from 0-100 in about 2 seconds, simply because you said this

    4/2 - Good impartial response Renai. We shall now wait with bated breath, for the anonymous crap which is sure to follow, from the simple minded anti Telstra brigade. (Hellooo Joe, Jason etc.,.)

    You could have finished after brigade, but decided to sow, and now you reap.

    Funny though, seems Mr Woolies was not only right about Woolies and Telstra shares, he was also right about you when he said you were a whole lot more than just his list of interesting names. Because look, right on cue, here's two more new descriptions of you (refer subject) right here Sydney Mike, snort.

    As usual your combination of big mouth and short fuse have gotten you in trouble. Plus I bet if you shaved the back of your head you'd find the word DYSON is on there somewhere.

    If you do have any sense at all, you may want to be a little more careful in future with your smarta*** comments.

    ***Try a little rational adult debate and respect other people's opinions and others like me will rationally debate and respect you too***.

    But because that will probably never occur from your end and in the meanwhile, while we wait and see -

    See you dumb***k, enjoy that 14% (hahahahaha) dividend.

    @bigotted homophobe Simon S -- 10/02/09 (in reply to #320122802)

    Why don't you quit while you are ahead, Jason. Your target seems to have gone away. BTW your Mr Wee Wee comment was particularly disgusting and thoroughly tasteless. Shame on you. Very little of what you have had to say is at all funny, interesting or worth reading. Why don't the three of you including Mr Woolies, simply grow up, and cease your attempted oneupmanship.

    Cya Mikey boy, because of your stupidity, I hope you enjoy poverty. Simon S -- 10/02/09 (in reply to #320122702)

    I have read some mean spirited stuff here from time to time, but your's win first prize for downright nastiness. Can't see what you or others get from it. You don't sound too bright to me.

    Sydney Mike you are pathetic Simon S' brother -- 10/02/09 (in reply to #320122850)

    Having made comments before, only to have you call me a f...wit for absolutely no reason, I have enjoyed watching you get humiliated.

    Your disgusting name calling is coming back to haunt you, Sydney Mike. Others can play your way too, but do it oh so much better.

    It's known as Karma.

    But how pathetic you are. You must get the last word in, just for your own trumped up but bruised ego, even if it's done anonymously or under a totally different name.

    I see you do it all time and it is obvious to everyone all the time. But you keep doing it.

    No one else would bother sticking up for you, because this is how you treat others. So give the ***t a rest and cop what you normally dish out, on the chin. Then just sulk off, tail between your legs Sydney Mike, because Jason owns you, boy.

    But if you want to keep playing these stupid games, Jase and Mr W, keep your foot on the f..kwits {look I can say that bad word too Sydney Mike} head, please.

    re Sydney Mike you are pathetic Simon S -- 11/02/09 (in reply to #320122867)

    That was a quick response Jason. You are such a wizard with words.

    re Sydney Simon S' brother -- 11/02/09 (in reply to #320122907)

    Thanks Sydney Mike, you aren't.

    But how about that, I can do it too.

    @Mr Woolies Jason -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122480)

    Hi to you too, Mr Woolies, welcome back! T'was I who actually dubbed you so!

    Apparently too, I own a VV ~ Veyron Van [Laughterbating with much gusto]!

    Thanks for the input and the interesting and *factual comparisons*.

    I can't believe how desperately moronic Sydney Muck [Mr 14%, Optus customer, snort] is either. Man he must be $250K and more in the red to be so out there and blind of how it is, but willing to continuously argue against the facts! Even when he ***ked up with his childish 14c (not 14% haha) calcs, he won't adnmit he's wrong and just name calls, what a disgraceful, selfish little boy he is.

    But as you say, pity is probably better than being nasty to him, as *Sydney Mike is obviously a few sandwiches short of the full picnic basket*!

    I'm sure everyone who has read his idiotic crap would agree.

    Jason.

    @Mr Woolies Sydney Mike -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122608)

    It is no wonder you nearly **** your pants, not long back Jason. You are so full of it.

    I'll bet you have been up all night in your caravan, desperately waiting and hoping to hear from me again.

    Come on, take the bait again you miserable little turd, cos you really do keep me amused with your non stop, ranting and raving. (I love it !!!)

    SYDNEY MIKE LOST HIS FAMILY'S LIFE SAVINGS! Jason -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122650)

    Sydney Muck = dumb***k beyond compare, Optus customer, Mr 14% mathematician, lol.

    At last you have realised what's going on here (mummy must have told you, because you are too ***king stupid to work it out). Yes someone is indeed having a lend of and playing with someone here. Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

    So how does it feel, me playing you for the fool you are, aiming hurtful comments at those huge Telstra share loses of yours and *telling everyone what a dumb***k you are because you lost your family's life savings*?

    Not only that, but you are so ***king stupid that you keep coming back daily, so that I can tell everyone again and again and again, what a dumb***k you are for losing your family's life savings. GOLD (I've just told everyone 2 more times and will again, now and then again at the conclusion of this, haha).

    What's worse is I'm right and that really gets to you, because you have indeed, lost your family's life savings, dumb***k. But but but, I paid $3.30, hahahaha, as if. And how about that *14% DIVIDEND*(priceless example of what an ignorant, uneducated f***wit you are). You probably are too stupid to realise your life savings are gone and actually believe the stupidity you write?

    It's like having a piece of string, dangling and wiggling it in front of a kitten that knows no better, corresponding with you, dumb***k. Hahahahahahahahaha, you are so predictable.

    But as me and Mr Woolies have said, we understand and pity you, nature is cruel and it is sad that you have a 6 month old brain in that old womans body of yours.

    I'm sure by now everyone already knows (I've told them enough) that dumb***k Sydney Muck lost his family's life savings by stupidly investing in Telstra shares.

    There's that string, dangling and wiggling again. I know you can't control yourself. So reply ........ now (even after you promised you wouldn't and have done so about 10 times, rofl).

    Even though everyone already knows, I'd still love to tell everyone again (for about the 100th time - in case we missed someone, lol), that you, SYDNEY MIKE LOST YOUR FAMILY'S LIFE SAVINGS, Optus customer Mr 14%. You poor stupid ***t.

    Like clockwork, little kitten, hahahahaha Jason -- 08/02/09 (in reply to #320122705)

    Haha, I get a feeling of deja vu. From above;

    *There's that string, dangling and wiggling again. I know you can't control yourself. So reply ........ now (even after you promised you wouldn't and have done so about 10 times, rofl).

    Even though everyone already knows, I'd still love to tell everyone again (for about the 100th time - in case we missed someone, lol), that you, SYDNEY MIKE LOST YOUR FAMILY'S LIFE SAVINGS, Optus customer Mr 14%. You poor stupid ***t.

    AND YOU DID REPLY, AS I KNEW YOU WOULD, moron, hahahaha.

    So as I promised I would continue to do and as you wish, now 101 times: -

    SYDNEY MIKE (Optus customer/Mr 14%) LOST HIS FAMILY'S LIFE SAVINGS BY STUPIDLY INVESTING IN TELSTRA SHARES.

    Be hearing from you soon, little sheep, dumb***k.

    re I feel pity for you. Sydney Mike -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122480)

    Ha Ha Ha !!! Mr Woolies, you are even funnier than your pathetic little bum boy Jason. Keep up the comedy routine you two. It's better than just sitting around together holding hands, kissing, and slapping each other on the back, whilst being unable to recognize the fact that I am simply teasing you too poofters. I'll try saying it once again, Get a Life, you knuckleheads !!!!

    OMG Sydney Mike -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122457)

    Jason, I suggest you sit down and do your sums again you knucklehead. Take $ 248,500 and add 14% per annum compound interest over 14 years (remember you just told me you bought your "Dream Property" back in 1995.) The total comes out to be $ 1,555,944.90. I don't believe that is what treble your outlay works out to be does it you prized F...WIT ?
    But then again, I think that you are just like your twin dipstick "Mr Woolies" and simply full of hypothetical crap. Otherwise you wouldn't keep trying to blow your bugle.

    OMG, I am corresponding with the stupidest man on earth. Jason -- 06/02/09 (in reply to #320122475)

    Dumb***k extrordinare. Can you get any sillier? I almsot sh*t my pants from laughing so loud at how f**king ridiculously stupid you are.

    You are getting 14c (((PER SHARE))) NOT 14c PER DOLLAR. SO, NO YOU ARE NOT GETTING 14% AT ALL, you absolute braindead MORON. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? Helloooo, stupid, the light is on but is anybody home?

    Seems you are the king size f**king knucklehead, who can't count, can't understand anything and will keep making himself the laughing stock of ZD for ever more.

    Please don't so, idiot, you are the funniest comedian I have ever seen. TARD.

    OMG, I am corresponding with the stupidest man on earth Sydney Mike -- 07/02/09 (in reply to #320122477)

    That was hilarious kiddies (Jason & Woolies). I was looking forward to it, and I am still rolling on the floor laughing, at the both of you ! You sure do take the bait, you pair of dead set morons !

    c'mon journalist! Anonymous -- 04/02/09

    You could have come up with a more interesting title to this article, more interesting than "crocodile interupts telstra operation"

    How about:
    "Baby croc helps join Telstra Fibre Optic Cable"

    c'mon journalist! Anonymous -- 04/02/09 (in reply to #320122262)

    How about, " Crocodile eats Union Delegate while he slept under tree during normal working hours".

    or Anonymous -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122295)

    crocodile eats worker pushed to collapse by greedy management,

    or Anonymous -- 05/02/09 (in reply to #320122348)

    Crocodile eats hard worker but then excretes the new Liberal leader, who loses the next election and becomes Telstra CEO.

    Questions for the Telstra Managers Darren Ellis -- 06/02/09

    1) If workers found a dry route to re-run cable during the flood. Why was this route not used to run the cable in the first place?. Do we need to review the policy on where cables can be run in flood prone areas?

    2) Access Points under water. Does Telstra have a policy regarding construction of access points in flood prone areas. Perhaps it would be prudent to construct the access points on or in structures above the flood levels. At least then they could be serviced by boat.

    3) Considering such critical infrastructure was put at risk should the policy of only having 5km of cable in regional depots be reviewed? Mind you can regional depots handle the 2.2 tonne, 3 mtr dia reels of cable anyway?

    Great story about overcoming adversity but what can be done to avoid the need to overcome in the first place? Secondly how can we make it easier to respond when these problems do occur?

    I am not a communications expert but it looks like someone needs to do some follow-up work on risk management

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie A guide to the future of the internet
    Last week we looked at the history of the internet in Australia. It's been around for 20 years and changed our lives in so many ways. Imagine what it could do given another 20 years.
  • Array Carelessness busts Linux security
    No operating system can ever properly protect a computer from trojans as long as users continue to do silly things. Just because Linux is immune to your standard drive-by viruses it does not mean that it can escape trojan horses.
  • Array Sun shining on Ajnaware
    Graham Dawson talks about the future of iPhone app development and augmented reality.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured