Conroy caves in to FTTN deadline demands

The Federal government has announced today that bidders for the national FTTN network will receive an extra 12 weeks to study network information for their proposals.

Federal Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, announced the extension today after pressure from Terria — formerly the G9 — and other industry figures to extend the deadline for proposals.

Conroy has now given all bidders an extra 12 weeks from the date that "all material is made available" to examine Australia's network infrastructure ahead of submitting their proposals.

"In February, I wrote to carriers seeking the voluntary disclosure of network information ... Telstra has provided some network information, however, despite its best efforts some information is not yet available," said Conroy in a statement.

"The provision of network information is vital to allow potential proponents to build the network to compete on an equal basis," he said, adding that "it is important that interested parties have adequate time to make use of information about existing infrastructure."

Although Conroy had previously refused to lengthen the bid process, but threats from Optus to pull out of the bid, and repeated claims that the network details provided by Telstra were inadequate for rival proposals may have prompted the Minister's decision.

"The Minister is under extreme pressure to deliver on this network by the end of the year — it was an election promise," said Paul Budde, telecommunications analyst.

"For him to delay proceedings at this stage is our clearest indication yet that Telstra is not living up to its end of the bargain. The government can see itself that Telstra hasn't offered up the right information," he said, "now they've put the ball back in Telstra's court."

Opposition communications spokesperson, Bruce Billson, issued a statement today describing the government's original 25 July deadline for proposals as "unrealistic".

"The bulk of this information is held by Telstra and without it other potential bidders are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to developing and costing credible proposals," he said.

David Kennedy, research director for analyst firm Ovum said he was "not surprised" by Conroy's decision: "If anything, the government has been pushing too hard to meet a political timetable."

"The extension must be kept in perspective: the network will take around four years to build, and it will be used for decades. A few extra weeks to ensure that the process is genuinely competitive are well worth any additional delay," he concluded.

Advertisement

Talkback 12 comments

  1. Watch the knives Senator. Sydney Lawrence -- 22/05/08

    Senator Conroy being the expert negotiator that he is, would be very aware that those well versed in the whinge and win theory(Optus) will flood Australia with tears (and litigation) if they don't get their own way.

    The Senator has a tight schedule to meet and deliver the promised NBN to Australians. Personally, I don't see any possibility of a successful delivery of the fibre with other than a Telstra build.

    1. tears (and litigation) Anonymous -- 22/05/08

      We all know who the masters of litigation are, and it's not TERRiA.

      Even if Telstra end up building the network (which I personally wouldn't like) at least there is now a slightly better chance of a fairer outcome.

      It is always a concern if an arbitrary political deadline were to override due process.

    2. Telstra Bully John -- 24/05/08

      Sydney you are full of it!!

    3. G9 / Optus Stooge Mr Smith -- 25/05/08

      John, let me guess ... your wallet is full Optus pay slips ...

      Easy to throw stupid one liners around isn't it...

    4. The irony James Bell -- 25/05/08

      Unlike your Telstra dividends hey Mr Smith?

    5. Irony is James' favorite word David -- 25/05/08

      As shareholders the interest is based on a choice of investing in a diverse range of companies. An attitude towards a company is not based on a handful of shares which may contribute a very small percentage of a person's income. For someone who's only association with a company is holding shares and to defend them the way Sydney does would have to be based on moral grounds and not financial. This is not implying that the cause is wrong or right, just that he believes it is right.

      Whereas an employee of a company who gets 95% of their income from one source is very likely to lie, cheat and manipulate to benefit that employer, they would also be be just as likely to change sides and attack the old source if the rewards are in his better interests.

      James Bell = financial motivation
      Sydney Lawrence = crusader

    6. Crusaders indeed James Bell -- 25/05/08

      David with a thought process like yours one really does have to wonder.

      The majority of people who post here and other forums such as Whirlpool in fact have no financial interests in any of these companies, but rather just care about the services they are receiving. As Telstra has an apalling history of providing decent broadband services it supposedly makes the majority of us "anti-Telstra". It's simply illogical to so supportive of one monopolistic corporation, so stop trying to turn the tables around by labeling staunch Telstra backers as "crusaders".

    7. What are you true interests James? David -- 25/05/08

      Why don't you tell the world what you do for a living and which company you work for. You are an employee of one of the members of the G9, part of the TTTT group and up until a few years ago you were an employee of Telstra and praised / pushed their services. I am sure you will sell your soul for a few bucks more.

    8. Could be nasty. Sydney Lawrence -- 25/05/08

      Dear John, full of what?

    9. Full of.... Reggie "The King" Crooner -- 28/05/08

      Full of passion for a cause one truely believes in...

      I'm a fence sitter but kudos for being passionate to your cause

  2. "Tail wagging the dog" Anonymous -- 22/05/08

    Is Senator Conroy better be careful that he does not "dance" to the tune of Terria!!!

    What we need is quite simple!

    True competition!!! Not the regulated, spongy type OPTUS love.

    1. "spongy type OPTUS love" Brock Stevens -- 28/05/08

      How can we have true competition without structural seperation of the FTTN network regardless of who builds the damn thing?

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Jude Willis Why eBay tried to screw Aussie users
    Now that the bizarre ruckus over eBay's proposed PayPal monopoly appears totalled, it seems a good time to ponder why eBay chose Australia to risk its reputation on such a massively unpopular scheme.
  • Array The more things change…
    With all the excitement over the iPhone, few people have noticed that 1 July was the 11th anniversary of the deregulation of Australia's telecommunications market.
  • Array I'm a celebrity, don't back me up
    Celebrity comes with its perks — free alcohol, better-looking partners, lots of holiday time — and disadvantages — constant media intrusions, being forced to appear in films with Eddie Murphy for the long-term good of your career, and having to do mindless radio interviews with angry men who've been awake since 4am.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured