Conroy FTTN demand puts Telstra spending on hold

Telstra has confirmed it will provide the government with the information it is seeking on the telco's broadband network -- and will put some of its investment on hold until after the fibre-to-the-node tender process is over.

The announcement comes after Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Stephen Conroy last week requested information from a number of telcos on their network assets, in order to provide the data to those companies planning to tender for the construction of Australia's fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network.

In a statement released to the ASX today, acting company secretary Claire Elliott said: "Telstra has responded to the Minister's request by proposing to provide a set of existing network information subject to security safeguards and the full indemnification of Telstra by the Commonwealth."

Telstra said the Minister's request centred around on information on the physical elements of the network, including the location of exchanges.

"We have a series of very strong protocols making sure that information doesn't fall into wrong set of hands," Telstra's head of regulatory affairs Dr Tony Warren said yesterday. "Being asked to share with all and sundry -- clearly we're not prepared to do that without the appropriate safeguards in place and we will be discussing with government to make sure those safeguards are in place."

A Telstra spokesperson said that the company would be seeking similar safeguards to those imposed during the T3 sale, such as data rooms, audit trails and strict protocols around who can take or copy the network information.

"We have a number of concerns about the information but our objective at this moment is very much to provide the information as quickly as we can, so the government and the country can get on with FTTN process," Telstra's Warren said.

The telco also revealed today that it expects the FTTN network to affect its own spending plans.

"In view of the FTTN process now commencing we will review current investment plans and it is likely that some investment will be put on hold until we know the outcome of the bid process."

Telstra said it will affect investment in areas where upgrades might be duplicated by the FTTN network -- but everyday maintenance won't be affected.

"We're not going to put people's services at risk -- we'll repair things when they break," Telstra's spokesperson said.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    Network details to tenderers - Conroy request William J Caelli -- 04/03/08

    It is absolutely essential that for any broadband policy setting an inventory of ALL network assets in the nation exists and that includes, in particular, any systems that limit access, including numbers, location, extent, configuration and performance factors of RIMs or equivalent multiplexing gear, pair gain circuit statistics, pair gain technologies and limitations, etc.

    As Wozniak of Apple fame was recently reported as saying - he had "sympathy" for those stuck "on the hill" with nothing but dial-up at all. "Pair gain victims" of Telstra are those who need help urgently.

    However, does any nation want such security significant data made publicly available or even detailed to other national governments or overseas corporate entities?

    Once again we are living with the legacy of the decision not to separate "logical/services" operations from the base telecommunications infrastructure in Telecom/Telstra BEFORE its sale.

    Bill Caelli - Gold Coast

    Shift of information and responsibility Lord Watchdog -- 05/03/08 (in reply to #320096726)

    If Telstra (or anyone) is asked to provide the Commonwealth with information then one would think that the Commonwealth would assume responsibility for protecting such information in their custody.

    I don't think that Telstra should have been split up before being sold in the same way that AT&T was split up in America. If Telstra was split into state-based companies here then the lot would have been swallowed in corporate takeovers.

    What should have happened is that Telstra and its subsidiaries be sold off as retail entities and the Commonwealth retain ownership of the network and be responsible for wholesaling and network maintenance/improvements only.

    With that model in place network access for all retailers would be more open and fairer.

    It's all well and good for Americans to come out here and moan about how things have been done. Notice how none of them offer to put up the money to change things for the better though, unlike Deutsch Telecom, who has offered to build a second national network and mirror Telstra's wholesale offerings.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured