CDMA users to ignore three-month deadline?

While the news of a three-month delay to the closure of Telstra's CDMA network has been welcomed by many, a number of problems still haunt Next G.

The National Farmers Federation (NFF) president, David Crombie, has been campaigning against the switch-off and welcomed the delay. "Many farmers are only now able to access and assess the new network fully," he said.

"Realistically, farmers and rural Australians haven't had much time to get, and adequately test, the new hardware to know whether Next G fulfils its requirement of being as good, if not better than CDMA."

Labor's political rivals also gave their conditional support to the decision.

Nationals leader Warren Truss said it is critical Telstra and the government work together to ensure CDMA users are able to obtain comparable service on Next G.

"It has been clear to many thousands of Australians living outside the major cities that Next G is not yet providing the service and coverage that users have come to expect under CDMA," he said.

Want to know more?

For all the latest news, analysis and opinion on wireless, click here

The Opposition communications spokesperson, MP Bruce Billson, backed the decision by Broadband Minister Stephen Conroy to postpone the closure, labelling the delay a direct result of actions taken by the Coalition during its tenure.

"This postponement decision was made possible by licensing conditions put in place by the former Coalition government that Telstra's Next G network must provide equivalent or better coverage than CDMA before the shutdown can occur," he said in a statement. "It will provide Telstra with additional time to fine-tune its Next G network and assist customers to make the transition."

Billson however criticised the Broadband Minister over comments that CDMA users should "find out what they need to do to replace their CDMA equipment and services ... [and] act quickly and carefully to ensure they obtain the right handsets, other equipment and services suitable to their needs".

"In many parts of rural and regional Australia mobile phones provide an important lifeline for hundreds of thousands of people and therefore it is vital they are serviced by a network that instils confidence by providing broad and reliable coverage," he said.

"While Telstra was confident its Next G network provided equivalent or better coverage than CDMA, anecdotal reports from around the country suggested this was not the case for everybody."

A survey of 1,200 farmers carried out by the NFF last week found that 71 percent believed CDMA to be more reliable than Next G and 23 percent said they had yet to make the switch to the 3G network.

However, an audit conducted by the Australian Communications and Media Authority found that while Next G performs in terms of coverage, hardware problems still dog the 3G network.

The question of appropriate equipment has been of particular concern to some, including the NFF. The Federation said the most common complaint raised by its members was that Next G handsets often needed a car kit to work, whereas CDMA phones can get a signal without additional equipment.

"From where the government sat, it was difficult to have a win-win situation. There are a number of complaints from rural areas -- it was difficult to please them and Telstra ... It really came down to a handset issue -- a number of handsets were not as sensitive as their CDMA peers," Nathan Burley, research analyst at industry watchers Ovum, said.

In announcing his decision, Minister Conroy also queried whether Next G can currently meet farmers' data needs. "Many essential service providers, farmers and agricultural companies use CDMA telemetry systems for remote data communications. I am concerned that some of these customers may not have had access to the necessary Next G equipment in time to migrate to the Next G network," he said.

Telstra in turn said it will "demonstrate that Next G Wireless Link and Telemetry customers have access to the necessary Next G equipment and have been given every opportunity to migrate".

CDMA users play waiting game
Telstra has so far declined to say how many users remain on CDMA but it has been engaging in a number of marketing initiatives to encourage the laggards to move to Next G, including crediting those moving from CDMA to a Next G contract with AU$100 against their bill and giving customers who agree to a three-year contract on Next G a handset upgrade every 12 to 18 months.

However, Telstra does not believe that the announcement of a three month period of grace will discourage the remaining users from finally making the switch.

"The majority of customers have made the move. There's some offers in the market now that won't be around in two to three months' time, so we're not concerned," the spokesperson said.

Ovum's Burley, however, said the delay could well stimulate procrastination among CDMA users: "There's no doubts from Telstra's comments that there's a lot of users waiting until the last minute and there's a lot of users who will wait an extra three months," he told ZDNet.com.au.

Despite the necessity of keeping the two networks running concurrently for an extra three months, Burley said that Telstra's bottom line is unlikely to be hit hard.

"I don't think it will be a significant impact," he said. "If you look at what the financial analysts are saying it's not a huge cost and potentially they may keep some customers happy [by keeping CDMA open]."

Telstra said Conroy's decision will not affect its financial guidance for the year.

AAP contributed to this report.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 8 comments

  1. Read the report and make up your own mind Anonymous -- 22/01/08

    It is noted that the definition of equivalent has been accepted by ACMA as NOT identical and this is clearly stated in the report many times.

    The report CLEARLY states that handset specifications are generally the issue when it comes to the end uses perception of the problem. There are many technical factors that change an end user experience.

    In total the report surveys found that there was less then a 3% coverage difference between CDMA and 3G.

    The blacked out sections of the report are declared Commecial in Confidence by Telstra, but indicate that a large proportion of handsets in use in rural areas are NOT suitable for that use. These were sold in the early part of the 3G rollout.

    They clearly state that users with problems should talk to Telstra FIRST - and my understanding is that Telstra are replacing handsets at a rapid rate - often with no changeover cost.

    The report also agrees that when the CDMA network is closed - the continual improvement of the 3G network will continue as much of the antenna equipme nt will be transferred to 3G use - naturally increasing the coverage.

    Also be aware that not all shops with a Telstra logo are a Telstra owned shop. Many are franchises with no link to Telstra other than a reseller agreement.

    If you are in the country - talk to Telstra Country Wide and make sure you go to a Telstra owned shop.

    http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/80704/CDMA-Next_G_Coverage_Equivalence.pdf

  2. $900 million lesson Anonymous -- 22/01/08

    What have we learnt with the spending of $900 million dollars on NextG.

    NextG was built in a rushed 10 months allowing huge chunks of the $900 million to be squandered into contrived performance bonuses.

    98% coverage of Australia was first advertised in October 2006 and 15 months later we are still waiting to achieve that figure.

    The engineering societies appealed to the highest bidder and give awards to an incomplete and non fully performing NextG network.

    Ericsson has been exposed for corruption.

    Lawyers in the telecommunication space have made so much money that they can now build their own version of an Australian telecommunications network.

    The Telstra mouthpiece tells us to report any issues with poor reception areas however it appears to be deaf in both ears when dealing with country concerns.

    "Talk to the Hand" would have made a better NextG slogan than "98% Coverage".

    The new superior NextG network cannot sell itself and needs millions of dollars in advertising to prop it up.

    Harvey-Norman payed people $200 to use NextG, free beer would have been better.

    Although the new network is more expensive than the old for the average mobile phone user, Australians are slowly discovering that by world standards they are being ripped off.

    Money well spent? Definite yes if you were in the receiving loop.

    Shareholders know very little about telecommunications networks and providing genuine levels of service throughout the entire year and for years to come.

    Bagging Telstra? Yes and no. The company needs to empower its capable engineers not its corporate flunkies. NextG is not the first WCDMA network to be installed, but the big money pie has brought out the worst in its implementation.

    SPAM is good for Telstra revenues by congesting bandwidth - don't give your e-mail address to Telstra.

    Syd is superiorman for his stellar performance in remaining cool and calm in these fiery forums.

    1. How many one liners can you come up with FU -- 22/01/08

      One more one liner and you could have been elected PM.

  3. CDMA-V- 3G Anonymous -- 22/01/08

    It is not just the lack coverage thats the problem cdma users have throw away a damm good mobile ph thats robust but convert to a delicate one.It does not stop here either as I found out.A std prepaid is $99 yet for regional use its $199 or $299 yet you get zero concession.Why should I fork out this sum just have my usable ph thrown away just to suit Telstra,quite frankly IT SUCKS.Telstra should replace my prepaid ph after all they updated the service and broke the aggreement and given they were still advertising CDMA not so long back then cut it in favour of 3 G. This outright piracy let alone the ambush at retail outlets of the impending closure to force customers to change at considerable cost just to maintain a phone that works.
    To me this is tantamount to fraud and deception and should be investigated.I will not convert to #G network unless they provide a replacement ph at no cost and those for people on 12/24 mth contracts as well.Lets also consider what is the profit margin the Telstra gets on the new phs they are not at cost price are they!!!! more profit.

    regards wayne Bunbury WA

    1. Yeah I agree Anonymous -- 22/01/08

      I tried to sue the fuel companies when they stopped making leaded petrol for my 1963 holden. Come on ... it's not fair, why should I upgrade my car when the body is only half full of rust and when it uses more iol then fuel but at leat it runs.

      Using your arguement they would still have the old analogue network running if people could still find a 1980's handset that works. ps. I still have my first mobile phone from 1991.

    2. Agree to this RON -- 22/01/08

      95 RON is the standard grade of fuel in Europe.
      In Australia we call it "Premium" because it helps create a new market for more dollars.

      In reality 95 RON is better for the environment than the 92 RON we call "standard". But don't let the facts get in the way of profit making.

      Telstra had every opportunity to introduce something that is desirable and worthwhile - but it has cocked it up big time because it became greedy.

    3. And which company isn't Anonymous -- 23/01/08

      You talk about greedy...

      How about Optus and Elders sitting on $968 million of our money without even wanting to spend $20 per month to host their own web site.

      After fighting to win the government's USO funding Optus handed back the responsibilities for maintaining the USO when they realised it took too much effort and didn't provide a big enough return, actually a loss, meaning Telstra was forced to take it over and incur the costs without the profits.

  4. Upgrade your battery Anonymous -- 24/01/08

    A 3GPP WDMA mobile phone will create more radio emission energy in a geographic area that has low or marginal coverage. This is necessary so that it can participate in the signal coding algorithms (Orthogonal Codes also known as device data streams, and PN Codes also known as device/base station channel streams). If a 3GPP WCDMA phone in a geographic area that has low or marginal coverage cannot present itself to the base station receiver with the correct frequency strength then it will interfere with signal coding algorithms and the phone by its 3GPP design will not participate in the WCDMA network resulting in a no network coverage message for the user.

    The ability for 3GPP WCDMA phones (and associated base stations) to present themselves with steady fixed signal strength levels at the receiver end is crucial for a WCDMA network to function without degrading the network.

    Therefore country users in geographic areas that have low or marginal WCDMA coverage will find that their phones will consume more battery power and that their phones will display a no network coverage message much earlier before the battery actually goes flat. This problem can be alleviated by upgrading to the latest battery technology (a fancy way of saying upgrade your phone) which is what Telstra is encouraging people in these areas to do.

    My view is that Telstra should be giving these phones away for free and that users in these marginal areas should always keep their phone batteries fully charged as practicable and at least have another means of operating at full power e.g. car kit.

    Yes, it is currently a worse situation for these users than the old CDMA, but technological advances in phone technology will make NextG desirable for them in the future. Perhaps Telstra can help them out here if they cannot be bothered installing base stations in these areas to alleviate this problem.

    (Note: I have never been a Telstra employee and I don't own Telstra shares, so Sol how about a job offer for explaining this?).

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured