Britain promises broadband for all

The British government has revealed plans to create a universal service commitment for broadband that would see every last one of the UK's broadband blackspots filled in.

It's even more important [than a next-generation rollout] to ensure that all UK residents have access to high-speed broadband.

Ofcom's Peter Phillips

However, it has not yet made a decision about whether it has a role to play in delivering 100 per cent coverage of next-generation broadband.

The Digital Britain interim report from minister for communications, technology and broadcasting Lord Carter, published overnight, calls for every home in the country to be broadband-enabled by 2012. According to the EU, four per cent of homes in rural areas of the UK are not within reach of broadband access.

However, only 56 per cent of UK homes had a broadband connection last year, figures from the Office for National Statistics show.

Under the plans set out by Lord Carter, all Britons would be guaranteed a connection speed of up to 2Mbps "delivered by a mixture of fixed and mobile, wired and wireless means".

The call for more widespread broadband has already received some industry backing. Strategy and markets development partner for Ofcom, Peter Phillips, told a conference last week: "It's even more important [than a next-generation rollout] to ensure that all UK residents have access to high-speed broadband."

Chief executive of the Broadband Stakeholder Group, Anthony Walker, also believes the question of availability must be dealt with.

"Where possible it is now time to address those 'notspots' in terms of availability and I think that's really on the basis that broadband is increasingly being seen as a basic utility for households, both in terms of the benefits of connectivity and also things like access to services such as BBC iPlayer and others," he told ZDNet.com.au sister site silicon.com, recently.

The report also details the government's intention to tackle 'broadband refuseniks' — those people who can get fat pipe access but for whatever reason choose not to — by encouraging the development of "public service champions of universal take-up".

On the issue of next-generation broadband, however, Lord Carter is far more circumspect, deferring a decision on whether the public sector has a role to play in helping push out next-gen coverage.

"We will establish a government-led strategy group to assess the necessary demandside, supplyside and regulatory measures to underpin existing market-led investment plans, and to remove barriers to the timely rollout, beyond those declared plans, to maximise market-led coverage of next-generation broadband," the report said.

"We will, by the time of the final Digital Britain report, have considered the value-for-money case for whether public incentives have a part to play in enabling further next-generation broadband deployment, beyond current market-led initiatives."

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    Gordon replaces Sol, KRudd and Wayne Mel Sommersberg -- 31/01/09

    What a headline, if only it were true. It's lovely to see many countries around the world making plans, solid plans, to update their networks. If only our own national government were able to put Australia amongst this select list of countries with governments that obviously give a damn more than ours does.

    His name is Rudd not Potter. Brod -- 31/01/09 (in reply to #320121982)

    11.5 years of political and social vaccuum under Howard, but you expect Rudd to wave the magic wand and make up for it all, in just over a year?

    Intelligence vacuum Mel Sommersberg -- 01/02/09 (in reply to #320121985)

    Brod, Under the Howard Government we got Cable, ADSL1, ADSL2, ADSL2+, half a dozen wireless technologies and a promise of another more widespread wireless network and a proposal for FTTN/FTTH. What more do you want?

    The only thing wrong was that the whole country didn't benefit but at least what transpired actually transpired. KRudd just makes promises and appoints working parties and steering committees to 'have a look' at what 'could' happen in years to come. All KRudd does is stuff around. How many new faster network technologies have been rolled out under KRudd's stewardship? Not one. Infact he, along with Senator CONroy, actually scrapped one that had ink put to paper. Take off the blinkers and wake up to yourself.

    In three years time we'll still be discussing the FTTN proposal here and many of the people who read what is being said will still be doing it with a 56k connection.

    The grass is always greener... Anonymous -- 01/02/09 (in reply to #320121982)

    My mother always taught me that "comparisons are odious", but in this case it is quite instructive.
    UK has a land area slightly in excess if the size of Victoria and a population of 60M compared to 5M. Compare apples to apples and you will see that coverage of high-speed broadband in Victoria already far exceeds the coverage in UK.
    Someone else can talk about the economics of covering an area 31 times the size of UK with a population of 1/3rd.
    I say, good onthe British government, but don't let it intrude on the debate we need in this country.

    Suck it and see Mel Sommersberg -- 01/02/09 (in reply to #320122028)

    Anonymous, the size of this country never prevented the construction of the overland telegraph and that was back when this country had a population of only approx 1 million with most of that in Sydney and Melbourne. Where did the overland telegraph run? Between Adelaide and Darwin. How many people lived there? Bugger-all.

    They didn't resort to excuses back then. They needed something and then built it. It sickens me when I see people saying it's too hard. with modern construction techniques and the machinery to achieve great things, along with the Aussie tradition of giving it a go we should be able to build a true national fibre network. The conparison of land masses is a moot point and just doesn't wash.

    Who thinks Britain is ahead? Verity Pravda -- 02/02/09

    The Digital Britain report is a draft report. What makes its call for universal broadband at 2Mbps) more credible than the Regional Telecommunications Review call for a new Communications Service Standard of 12Mbps?

    As to young Mel whatever. The Howard Government didn't deliver any ot those things. The market and the regulations did. The regulatory framework was essentially the 1996 draft put forward by Michael Lee (ALP).

    In fact, under Howard Telstra wasn't turning on ADSL2+ - this happened under Rudd.

    The ink might have been on the OPEL contract, but it was cancelled because OPEL couldn't DELIVER, technically, they couldn't meet the conditions precedent in the contract. Conroy would have been wilfully mis-spending Government money if he hadn't cancelled it.

    (Oh and the HFC networks were deployed before Howard became PM I think.)

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured