Australia getting more broadband for its buck

By Marcus Browne, ZDNet.com.au
30 January 2008 03:16 PM
Tags: user, usage, pipe, peter coroneos, isp, iia, data, capacity

Australian broadband users are getting more out of their Internet connections although prices have remained static, a report from the Internet Industry Association (IIA) has found.

"What our most recent survey found was that the prices haven't changed but the capacities of people's connections are increasing," Peter Coroneos, chief executive of the Internet Industry Association (IIA), said.

According to Coroneos, competition between ISPs is driving increased capacity: "Ours is one of the most competitive industries in Australia in terms of the number of players. We identified as many as 600 ISPs of all descriptions at year's end 2007."

Despite the diversity of Australian ISPs, the IIA research found that it was mainly competition between the big names that was most beneficial to customers.

The report found that data caps, particularly those offered by large providers, were being increased substantially to satisfy the high usage patterns of Australian broadband users.

The report concludes that the average cost of data was AU$80/gigabyte at the start of 2007 but fell to AU$52/gigabyte by the end of the year.

Despite the promising statistics, Coroneos said: "A broader question from the research is what can be done to reduce the underlying cost of data in Australia."

He told ZDNet.com.au today that he believes "Australia still has a way to go in terms of utilising the real possibilities of broadband," and said the relationship between broadband, industry and innovation will be critical in the years to come.

"It will fundamentally become what electricity was to industry 150 years ago," he said. "That's the kind of the trajectory we're on, heading towards the industrialisation of broadband."

The IIA chief executive predicted that 2008 will see even greater competition on the capacity front, as some ISPs prepare their business plans with the increased overseas capacity enabled by the Pipe Pacific Cable in mind.

"How fast is fast enough is really a question of end-user expectations, the Internet as a whole is being underutilised at the moment," he said.

While Coroneos believes that the Pipe cable has already had an effect on the broadband market even before its construction, some industry watchers have been more reserved in their judgement.

Guy Cranswick, senior analyst at research firm IBRS, told ZDNet.com.au that "it is absolutely impossible to say right now" how the cable will affect retail broadband pricing.

Advertisement

Talkback 11 comments

    Alternative Headline: Highway Robbery Slightly Less Blatant Anonymous -- 31/01/08

    The problem is that the $52 per gigabyte is an average of companies that charge $3 to $5 per gigabyte (Exetel, aaNet, Internode) and those that charge $150 per gigabyte (Telstra, Optus). Abusive over-pricing of excess usage is still rampant; it's just that customers are more informed and are leaving those companies.

    If I focused on small high profit targets I could afford to discount Anonymous -- 31/01/08 (in reply to #320094643)

    You talk about a few small companies who will not venture outside their chosen high profit areas against companies that are spreading their services across the country and bearing the burden of losing money in some areas.

    Nonsense Andrew Maizels -- 31/01/08 (in reply to #320094662)

    Internode, to pick one example, is the only provider of ADSL2 Annex M services in Australia, and is rolling out a WiMAX network in regional SA right now.

    And even if that weren't the case, it would hardly justify Telstra and Optus slugging their customers with a 10,000% markup on data charges.

    Yes, ten thousand percent.

    Who needs it? Carlos -- 01/02/08 (in reply to #320094703)

    Instead of simply saying Only one who offers Annex M why don't you explain what it is. It allows up to 3.5Mbps upload speed on ADSL2+ if the users is sitting in the exchange, the degradation in speed is much more dramatic then non-Annex M and as such the real speed improvement for 80% of people is under 10%.

    You claim a 100 fold increase in data costs, what benchmarks are you using? looking at both their web sites I can not seem to find any comparison that exceeds 3 -4 times the cost.

    Once again someone who runs an organisation that benefits if Telstra fails comes up with facts to suit their argument even if the inaccuracies are completely transparent.

    Who Needs 10,000% Markups? Andrew Maizels -- 02/02/08 (in reply to #320094750)

    Who needs Annex M? People who want faster uploads.

    Not everyone can take advantage of it, but how does that justify Telstra and Optus's business practices of fleecing uninformed customers?

    I can get data, retail, delivered to my site, in small volume with no commitment, no limits and no prepayment, for $2 per GB. (Exetel's current business SHDSL pricing.)

    So either Telstra and Optus are so overwhelmingly incompetent that they are paying vastly more than that and merely passing the costs on to their customers - in which case, they don't deserve to have any customers - or they are robbing their customers blind - in which case, they don't deserve to have customers.

    The facts are all publically available. That you accuse me of making them up is reprehensible. And how you can claim that I am "someone who runs an organisation that benefits if Telstra fails" is beyond me.

    Perhaps you should stop blindly defending Telstra and flinging accusations about and actually examine the facts?

    Can you confirm a few things Carlos -- 02/02/08 (in reply to #320094822)

    You talk about Exetel's $2 per GB over SHDSL.

    Can you confirm if this is inclusive of the access costs, is true G.SHDSL (Symmetric High Bit Rate DSL) or is it SDSL (ADSL sold in a symmetric form) also if Annex M is so good why are you using a different technology and provider?

    Also one second you talk about 10,000% mark-up and then you say “vastly more”, the previous comment was asking you to provide facts to substantiate such wild comments and once again all that anyone can come up with is punch lines and spin.

    And finally, my apologies if you do not work for a competing organisation but your comments have all the hallmarks of a stooge writer wanting to get extra publicity for their own company.

    A Huge 600MB! Grump -- 03/02/08

    Just checked out BP's latest fantastic plans.
    For $60/mth i can have ADSL2 capped at 600MB.
    So for my first hour each month I could get high speed broadband then spend the next 30 days on ADSL dial-up at 64Kb.
    Can't wait to sign up lol.
    i regularly get unsolicited calls from Telstra attempting to entice me back into the fold but each time i've asked if BP will even come close to matching my current provider's plans for some reason they just hang up??? (as recent as 2 days ago)
    G.

    Au usual pick the worst possible example to bag Telstra Really Really Grumpy -- 04/02/08 (in reply to #320094863)

    Why not mention 12GB capped for $90 or $7.50 per GB, how about 25GB uncapped for $100 or $4 per GB and finally 60GB uncapped for $150 or $2.50 per GB.

    There are actually people out there who don't download lots of stuff or waste bandwidth like you and me on these stupid news sites adding stupid half truth comments.

    Au usual pick the worst possible example to bag Grump -- 05/02/08 (in reply to #320094918)

    Why bother to mention the rest of Telstras' rip-offs when my current ISP provides uncapped,unshaped, unlimited BB downloads for just $45/mth?
    There are also people out there (retired) on limited incomes who don't appreciate Telstra's regular calls attempting to fleece the uninformed.
    G.

    What has cold calls got to do with the subject? Anonymous -- 06/02/08 (in reply to #320094965)

    Every You appear to have been waken at 3am a few times by the phone ringing and become upset. That has nothing to do with the topic and making claims like you do against Telstra fleecing the uninformed is about as stupid a claim as I have ever seen. Telstra is so closely scrutinised that even using one wrong word gets the authorities chasing them. Telstra as an organisation will always try and make a profit and like the majority of companies will try and make their profits honestly. Why don't you stop making these unsubstantiated emotional claims and provide some real facts.

    more highway robbery shane -- 07/02/08

    It must be nice to be able to chop and change isps' to get the "best deals"
    try having to put up with satellite. now THAT is being ripped off. $35.00 a Gb for a 2gb limit before dialup speeds kick in. and we just can't head off to another isp. when I put the question of price and service of satellite to the last government (they introduced the broadband connect service etc) I was informed that sat pricing is based on the "average" of all delivery methods. yeah right!!! Oh and really really grumpy, I like my news sites too. at least with a little digging the truth will out.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured