ACMA asks for suggestions on restricted content

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is calling for comments on planned changes to the way online and mobile content is regulated.

ACMA is proposing a new framework on content regulation, which aims to "amalgamate the regulation of all content services delivered via carriage services and extend the regulatory framework ... to a broad range of content services delivered on convergent devices", according to the Authority.

While ACMA claims that the consolidation of the existing legislation is an attempt to bring the regulatory framework up to date with developments in the areas of mobile and streaming online content, the changes outlined in the proposal also indicate increasingly tighter controls on content itself.

The changes proposed will not only increase measures to limit access to restricted content, but will also broaden ACMA's powers to remove prohibited content hosted in Australia.

ACMA said: "The changes apply to content hosted on sites hosted either in Australia or overseas. In the case of Australian content, ACMA will have a capability to issue a notice to whoever hosts content that is classified X18+ or refused classification to take it down, or to place content classified MA15+ or R18+ behind access restrictions."

The legislation also includes an unconditional prohibition of X18+ material hosted in Australia.

ACMA intends to cover a range of platforms with the amendments, including Internet content accessed from a home computer or a mobile, and mobile premium content.

The Authority has paid particular attention to the regulation of premium mobile content with the upcoming round of changes, after introducing legislation governing its access in 2005. The changes will require that age restricted mobile content only be provided by numbers prefixed with 195 or 196.

ACMA is now seeking comment from the interested parties on the changes. Deadlines for submissions of comment vary according to each piece of individual legislation, for more information visit http://www.acma.gov.au.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 3 comments

  1. CENSORSHIP? Keith Styles -- 30/10/07

    This NGO is starting to sound like a nanny.

    I'm an adult. I don't need some nebulas bureaucrat telling me what I can or can't read or look at!

    A nasty little corporal with a moustache from Austria, last century, tried to pretty much do what this group of nongs are trying to do. He failed miserably, but it took a world war to stop him.

    Do we really need this tight control of our thoughts and potentially a barrier to our world trading ability?

    1. Re: CENSORSHIP? Ash Laws -- 05/11/07

      Oh, come on. I agree that these suggestions by ACMA sound a little over the top, but I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to Nazi Germany.

      I am quite against any government regulation of the internet, as all it takes is one false step for a landslide of beaurocracy and legislation.

    2. Unable to log in on mxit Anonymous -- 06/07/08

      Plz help!0760174931

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured