ACMA asks for suggestions on restricted content

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is calling for comments on planned changes to the way online and mobile content is regulated.

ACMA is proposing a new framework on content regulation, which aims to "amalgamate the regulation of all content services delivered via carriage services and extend the regulatory framework ... to a broad range of content services delivered on convergent devices", according to the Authority.

While ACMA claims that the consolidation of the existing legislation is an attempt to bring the regulatory framework up to date with developments in the areas of mobile and streaming online content, the changes outlined in the proposal also indicate increasingly tighter controls on content itself.

The changes proposed will not only increase measures to limit access to restricted content, but will also broaden ACMA's powers to remove prohibited content hosted in Australia.

ACMA said: "The changes apply to content hosted on sites hosted either in Australia or overseas. In the case of Australian content, ACMA will have a capability to issue a notice to whoever hosts content that is classified X18+ or refused classification to take it down, or to place content classified MA15+ or R18+ behind access restrictions."

The legislation also includes an unconditional prohibition of X18+ material hosted in Australia.

ACMA intends to cover a range of platforms with the amendments, including Internet content accessed from a home computer or a mobile, and mobile premium content.

The Authority has paid particular attention to the regulation of premium mobile content with the upcoming round of changes, after introducing legislation governing its access in 2005. The changes will require that age restricted mobile content only be provided by numbers prefixed with 195 or 196.

ACMA is now seeking comment from the interested parties on the changes. Deadlines for submissions of comment vary according to each piece of individual legislation, for more information visit http://www.acma.gov.au.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    CENSORSHIP? Keith Styles -- 30/10/07

    This NGO is starting to sound like a nanny.

    I'm an adult. I don't need some nebulas bureaucrat telling me what I can or can't read or look at!

    A nasty little corporal with a moustache from Austria, last century, tried to pretty much do what this group of nongs are trying to do. He failed miserably, but it took a world war to stop him.

    Do we really need this tight control of our thoughts and potentially a barrier to our world trading ability?

    Re: CENSORSHIP? Ash Laws -- 05/11/07 (in reply to #320088832)

    Oh, come on. I agree that these suggestions by ACMA sound a little over the top, but I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to Nazi Germany.

    I am quite against any government regulation of the internet, as all it takes is one false step for a landslide of beaurocracy and legislation.

    Unable to log in on mxit Anonymous -- 06/07/08 (in reply to #320089163)

    Plz help!0760174931

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured