Misspelled Google case may end up in court

A local businessman wants googl.com.au and has threatened to sue the Australian domain regulator to get it.

The domain was recently registered to local Peter Bojanac -- who claimed to ZDNet Australia  he had applied for a trademark for 'googl' -- but has now been confiscated by .au Domain Administration (auDA). The regulator's chief executive Chris Disspain said it was an obvious misspelling of Google and therefore its registration was against his organisation's domain policy.

Google itself owns the local google.com.au domain name as well as a registered trademark.

Disspain said even if the trademark had been registered, it would not give Bojanac any leverage to keep the domain.

According to Bojanac -- the owner of search engine marketing company DanceString -- the domain was registered with the intent of promoting a new software technology he had acquired. He said his product was not a search engine or an online content portal.

"They're in the process of deleting that domain name," he said. "I've requested the return of it, otherwise I'll take legal action against them."

"Google have a trademark on 'Google'. They don't have a trademark on 'Googl'," he pointed out.

Bojanac accused auDA of not being able to uphold its own guidelines, and said having a legitimate claim to a domain name meant nothing to the regulator.

"I'm going to go to my lawyers this afternoon," he concluded.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

  1. Hi Could you ask Peter to get in touch with me please. auDA is being "selective" in its interpretation of policy. They used the exact opposite logic on me several years ago when they claimed that logistics and logistic were two diffe Anonymous -- 22/06/05

    Hi

    Could you ask Peter to get in touch with me please. auDA is being "selective" in its interpretation of policy. They used the exact opposite logic on me several years ago when they claimed that logistics and logistic were two different words and could be different domain names.

    ph 07 5463 2744

    Rgds

  2. TAKING ADVANTAGE OF OWN WRONG It seems the Domain Registration Agency is taking advantage of its own wrong. Firstly, it should not have granted the disputed domain name in favour of its holder as the same is not only capable of creating confusio Anonymous -- 24/06/05

    TAKING ADVANTAGE OF OWN WRONG

    It seems the Domain Registration Agency is taking advantage of its own wrong. Firstly, it should not have granted the disputed domain name in favour of its holder as the same is not only capable of creating confusion but also deceptively similar to the domain name and Trademark in favour of Google.

    Secondly, once they were satisfied that there was no mala fide intention in getting the disputed domain name, they should not now cancel or confiscate it.

    The holder of the domain name seems, at least prima facie, to be acting in good faith. Further, the name of Google is not new in the Internet community and the registration authority must have known about its existence.

    Looking from any count, the confiscation of the disputed domain name is not reasonable now particularly when the business proposed to be started by the holder is different from the Google.

    Alternatively, the holder of the disputed domain name must be suitable "compensated" for "surrendering" his domain name.But, the registration authority has no right to unilaterally confiscate the domain name at this final stage.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Startup Camp Sydney: The review
    Three new Australian technology start-ups, uTag, TrafficHawk.com.au and LinkViz, were conceived and launched over the weekend in a lightning initiative dubbed "Startup Camp Sydney".
  • Array Telstra's BT coat doesn't fit
    The vision of the future BT portrayed this week at an Australian conference was so far removed from how Telstra's David Quilty has described the British telco that I wonder if they were talking about the same UK.
  • Array Australian security: the lucky country
    Does anyone seriously believe that Australian businesses and government agencies manage security any better than the US or UK?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured