iPod's 'dirty little secret' wins Web fans

Two filmmakers are getting attention around the Net for an "antiadvertising" project aimed at protesting what they call the "dirty secret" of the iPod music player--its battery life.

Brothers Casey and Van Neistat, who collaborate on video projects using Mac editing software, said they were told by a technical support representative at Apple Computer that the cost to replace the dead battery in an 18-month-old iPod would be US$255--comparable to the cost of a new device. Irked at what seemed to be the early obsolescence of the music player, the brothers trekked around New York City stenciling the words "iPod's unreplaceable battery lasts only 18 months" on all the iPod posters they could find.

Now the Neistats claim that the video they created of their exploits is getting 50,000 hits a day on the Web site Ipodsdirtysecret.com. As of Wednesday afternoon, the site's traffic counter indicated it had seen more than 194,000 visitors.

As it turns out, it's possible to replace the battery for as little as US$49 using third-party kits. Apple itself offers a battery-replacement service for about US$106 including mailing, with a 90-day guarantee on materials and workmanship. Apple's program was introduced only in the past two weeks.

Other iPod users have reported that the device's battery life diminishes with use, as is common for many rechargeable batteries. Unlike standard disposable batteries, the rechargeable power supplies used in the iPod and other high-tech gadgets do not come in a standard design. Replacing the battery involves a tricky process of dismantling the gadget, but third parties offer this service for around US$70.

More information on the iPod Battery Replacement Program is available from Apple's technical support Web site.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    McDonald's stopped serving foo ...tooner440 -- 17/12/03

    McDonald's stopped serving food in styrofoam containers because of the environmental hazards. They made a big deal about it, with a publicity campaign and everything. Funny thing is, they still serve the food in styrofoam in most places outside the US. Consumer groups in the US put enough pressure on McDonald's to force them to change their policy, and McDonald's turned it into a PR win, loudly trumpeting their concern for the environment. They received no such pressure outside the US, so their concern for the environment outside the US diminished accordingly.

    All corporations are the same. The only person looking out for the consumer is the consumer.

    Styrofoam was banned some 15 y ...Anonymous -- 21/07/04

    Styrofoam was banned some 15 years ago in Australia (and McD's have since used paper or cardboard). I'm not sure what this has to do with anything.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured