Will Microsoft buy Red Hat?

commentary Impossible?

OK. So anti-trust lawyers would have a field day but consider this -- the software giant is on an official spending spree and this is the best time to spread its wings ... to become the Coca-Cola of the IT industry.

Like most successful companies in the FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) world, the Coca-Cola Company has been extremely effective at diversifying both its brands and target audience.

Who would have thought that a mere carbonated soft drink could one day create a beverage powerhouse with nearly 400 brands in 200 countries? Under the umbrella of Coke came spinoffs like Vanilla Coke and Diet Coke for the health conscious. Sprite, Fanta, Lift and Powerade are also familiar names.

To compare Microsoft and Coca-Cola may seem like an unbalanced juxtaposition but there are similarities. Microsoft has launched a "diet" version of Windows called Windows XP Starter Edition in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Russia and India.

Microsoft is intent on growing, organically or otherwise. Since 1994, it has made 61 acquisitions and invested in 138 companies and there´s no stopping now. In fact, chief financial officer John Connors recently said big acquisitions are on the radar following its failed attempt at SAP.

Expansion comes in a variety of ways and for a myriad of reasons. Hewlett-Packard harboured the desire to topple IBM but after shelling out US$19 billion for Compaq, has it come any closer? Oracle's hostile takeover of PeopleSoft is another classic example of guerilla tactics in the tech industry. Will $7.7 billion be enough to kill the competition?

As for Microsoft, there are several opportunities to consider.

If Microsoft wants to expand its operating system empire, then a look at Linux vendors such as Red Hat might do the trick. Instead of a outright acquisition -- since authorities are bound to play the anti-competitive card -- Microsoft can also consider acquiring a stake in the Linux vendor.

If this proves too much of a barrier, then Microsoft might consider developing its own Linux operating system. It definitely has the marketing muscle and R&D dollars to pursue it. Whether it fits into the company´s overall strategy is another question.

Another target could be, well, Oracle.

Since SQL Server has a leading share in the mid-sized market, Oracle would fill the enterprise database gap for Microsoft. As a sweetener, Oracle's majority stake in Japan´s Miracle Linux -- which co-developed the Asianux 1.0 Linux operating environment -- would give Microsoft a backdoor into Asia's burgeoning open-source software market.

Storage vendors such as EMC and Veritas could also be takeover targets. If MSN wants to tighten its stranglehold on the Internet sector, a likely candidate would be Yahoo. And what about online auctions? Should eBay be concerned?

To these companies, the Redmond giant is a bitter enemy. But armed with a blank cheque, Microsoft could prove even more fatal.

Advertisement

Talkback 16 comments

  1. A very misleading title for this story. People will assume Microsoft had officially thought of the idea of purchasing Redhat. Not stocks not nothing!!! Anonymous -- 29/09/04

    A very misleading title for this story. People will assume Microsoft had officially thought of the idea of purchasing Redhat. Not stocks not nothing!!!

  2. I always enjoy finding out the latest in the IT world of news, but this article is no more than gossip to fill a page and waste my time. I did not appreciate the absence of any real content. If the information highway has come to this, people mu Anonymous -- 29/09/04

    I always enjoy finding out the latest in the IT world of news, but this article is no more than gossip to fill a page and waste my time.
    I did not appreciate the absence of any real content.
    If the information highway has come to this, people must really have boaring lives or you can't be bothered sourcing real issues with factual content.

  3. i too agree, what a terrible article! Anonymous -- 29/09/04

    i too agree, what a terrible article!

  4. That a bit sneaking of Microsoft! They can steal their code and modify OS like they did with Windows from Xerox! That'll give them a double monopoly that nobody will beat!! They sure will get really fat greedy billions of profits out of peoples' pockets. Anonymous -- 29/09/04

    That a bit sneaking of Microsoft! They can steal their code and modify OS like they did with Windows from Xerox! That'll give them a double monopoly that nobody will beat!! They sure will get really fat greedy billions of profits out of peoples' pockets. I don't like that idea of it.

  5. Gossip of course (very old gossip to boot), and let us not forget that our MS friends collective ego just would not allow it. They have effectively locked themselves out of this move via comments/marketing like "...its a toy..." "...Op Anonymous -- 30/09/04

    Gossip of course (very old gossip to boot), and let us not forget that our MS friends collective ego just would not allow it.
    They have effectively locked themselves out of this move via comments/marketing like "...its a toy..." "...Open Source is a cancer..." "....we are cheaper..." and "....our systems are more secure..."
    All those sweetheart license deals for the big boys who commit to "exclusive MS architectures" would look rather silly business wise wouldn't they?

  6. Not expected from ZDNet at all !!! Put in some facts.....please do not make this a gossip column..... Anonymous -- 30/09/04

    Not expected from ZDNet at all !!!
    Put in some facts.....please do not make this a gossip column.....

  7. Ok, this is not even a well thought out fantasy. GPL. It's the holy water to Microsoft's Dracula. They won't touch it. Microsoft can't buy Red Hat because of their twice convicted monopolistic ways. However, even if they COULD, GNU/Lin Anonymous -- 30/09/04

    Ok, this is not even a well thought out fantasy.

    GPL. It's the holy water to Microsoft's Dracula. They won't touch it.

    Microsoft can't buy Red Hat because of their twice convicted monopolistic ways. However, even if they COULD, GNU/Linux is not a single entity product; it belongs to the a world-wide community. Microsoft would own nothing simply because they don't see any monetary values in GNU/Linux's community values.

  8. I half expect them to buy SCO Microsoft owns Unix, Shock, Horror, Dispair! Anonymous -- 30/09/04

    I half expect them to buy SCO
    Microsoft owns Unix, Shock, Horror, Dispair!

  9. I'm glad I don't use Red Hat. Anonymous -- 01/10/04

    I'm glad I don't use Red Hat.

  10. Neither RedHat nor Fedora Core are the only GNU/Linux OSs. If RedHat is tempted to sell its actives to William Gates III (were there another two homonimous morons before this one?) I'll spit on it. Hey, Gates, Ballmer and company! We are legion. Anonymous -- 01/10/04

    Neither RedHat nor Fedora Core are the only GNU/Linux OSs. If RedHat is tempted to sell its actives to William Gates III (were there another two homonimous morons before this one?) I'll spit on it.

    Hey, Gates, Ballmer and company! We are legion. Sell your buggy, sick, horribly designed OSs. This is a free market. It's all about freedom, don't it?

    But if you think you are going to erase us, the free thinkers, the free people, the not-slaves of your **** empire, you must have less I.Q. than the number of MB of RAM of your toys.

    You can buy RedHat, you can buy Sun, you can buy all the NASDAQ enterprises. But, you can't buy us. There are things that all your money can't buy. One of them: my freedom.

    Yours very truly, suckers,

    Andrés González Cantú

  11. Your missing the most important point... WHO ON EARTH WOULD BUY AN MICROSOFT OWNED LINUX!!!!! Linux stands for everything that microsoft isn't. People use Linux because they don't want to use Microsoft. If Microsoft was to acquire a Li Anonymous -- 04/10/04

    Your missing the most important point...

    WHO ON EARTH WOULD BUY AN MICROSOFT OWNED LINUX!!!!!

    Linux stands for everything that microsoft isn't. People use Linux because they don't want to use Microsoft. If Microsoft was to acquire a Linux vendor or create their own distro, they would fail.

  12. Why this caption when there is more stuff inside..? Anonymous -- 07/10/04

    Why this caption when there is more stuff inside..?

  13. I think M$ should buy SCO and, with the UNIX brand, they would suit everyone in the free sofware world... How about that for an apocalypse scenario? Anonymous -- 21/10/04

    I think M$ should buy SCO and, with the UNIX brand, they would suit everyone in the free sofware world...

    How about that for an apocalypse scenario?

  14. If Microsoft expanded into opensource linux like that.. Everyone would buy mandrake NUF SAID Anonymous -- 21/10/04

    If Microsoft expanded into opensource linux like that.. Everyone would buy mandrake NUF SAID

  15. Only kids and people without a purpose use Linux for political reasons. And it's a poor religion. Microsoft owning RedHat would most likely bolster enterprise confidence in Linux, increase hardware support, and also make it less scary for new u Anonymous -- 09/12/04

    Only kids and people without a purpose use Linux for political reasons. And it's a poor religion.

    Microsoft owning RedHat would most likely bolster enterprise confidence in Linux, increase hardware support, and also make it less scary for new users. But it's irrelevant as Microsoft buying Linux would dillute their brand and position and cause lost faith with their Windows customers. It's just not plausible.

  16. Those basterds!!! I would buy a god dam mac before I used a Microsoft Linux!!! Anonymous -- 02/04/05

    Those basterds!!! I would buy a god dam mac before I used a Microsoft Linux!!!

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Jude Willis Why eBay tried to screw Aussie users
    Now that the bizarre ruckus over eBay's proposed PayPal monopoly appears totalled, it seems a good time to ponder why eBay chose Australia to risk its reputation on such a massively unpopular scheme.
  • Array The more things change…
    With all the excitement over the iPhone, few people have noticed that 1 July was the 11th anniversary of the deregulation of Australia's telecommunications market.
  • Array I'm a celebrity, don't back me up
    Celebrity comes with its perks — free alcohol, better-looking partners, lots of holiday time — and disadvantages — constant media intrusions, being forced to appear in films with Eddie Murphy for the long-term good of your career, and having to do mindless radio interviews with angry men who've been awake since 4am.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured