VeriSign unit hit with URL-switch suit

By Dawn Kawamoto
30 September 2003 09:00 AM
Tags: network solutions, url, optima, cybersquatting, verisign, dns
Storage specialist Optima Technology has filed a lawsuit against Network Solutions, alleging that the registrar gave away its domain name without its permission and so caused damage to its business.

The suit, filed in Orange County Superior Court, alleges that Network Solutions transferred ownership of its www.optimatech.com name to former Optima employee Michael DeCorte, allowing him to divert Optima's revenue into his possession.

"This is no different than parking your car with the valet, giving your key to the valet attendant and coming out after a wonderful dinner, only to find your car was stolen as the valet gave your keys to a crook without checking to see if you authorised the theft," said Barry Eisler, Optima's president, in a statement Monday.

Optima, which filed its domain name with Network Solutions around 1990, is seeking more than US$3 million in damages from the VeriSign subsidiary.

The lawsuit follows a federal appeals court ruling in July, in which the original owner of Sex.com won the right to sue Network Solutions for transferring a domain name without proper notification. Previously, a lower court had ruled domain names were not covered by laws governing tangible property.

When Optima noticed its sales plummeting in 2001, it began investigating and discovered its revenue had been diverted, according to Optima spokesman Jack Geering.

"We don't know exactly when (DeCorte) gained control of our domain name and when he began diverting our sales traffic," Geering said. "When we confronted Network Solutions, they refused to give us the information. They said they had a letter from our company authorising the transfer and had also had follow-up phone calls with us."

Optima alleges DeCorte was joined by another former employee, Raymond Martin, in diverting its revenue via a fake Web site.

Network Solutions returned the domain name back to Optima in 2001.

VeriSign, which bought Network Solutions in 2000, declined to comment on the pending Optima litigation.

Separately, the Sex.com case has been returned to the lower courts to render a decision, according to Tom Galvin, a spokesman for VeriSign. He said the Optima case is first filed since the federal appeals court ruling.

Geering said Optima decided to pursue its case against Network Solutions after the federal appeals court had ruled in the Sex.com case.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Digitalcameras Store Anonymous -- 04/04/06 (in reply to #120132159)

    I want mp3 player. What will advise?

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Love me, tender
    Considering how expensive and drawn-out tender processes can be to solve problems that might be very immediate, it's little wonder that the Victorian Police IT department tried to work the tender exemptions system.
  • Array 2009 funding drought rolls on
    For Australian start-ups looking for venture capital, 2009 was a very bad year. 2010 may be no better.
  • Array Can not-so-smart meters help the NBN?
    It was interesting to witness Conroy's recent enthusiasm to spruik the NBN's role in supporting the Smart Grid, Smart City initiative. What a pity that Conroy hadn't yet seen the damning report from the Victorian auditor-general about that state's smart-meter roll-out.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured