Budde's report claimed that Telstra had negotiated a cheaper wholesale copper access deal with Optus to protect its network assets, as, he said, the deal will push back the advent of VoIP technology competition in the market.
The report said that Telstra's recent agreement on pricing for PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) access from mid-2003 to mid-2006 with its chief rival was designed to protect the telecommunications player's "aging network" from becoming obsolete.
However, Telstra spokesman Rod Bruem said that the notion that Telstra negotiated a "cheap deal" with Optus was nothing but a "media beat-up".
"Pricing for the service was determined by the ACCC [Australian Competition and Consumer Commission]," said Bruem. "The comment by Budde saying 'after close to a decade of failed, or at least very painful, negotiations, Telstra has come up with this announcement' is total nonsense."
Bruem said Optus had signed a two year deal with Telstra and the negotiation process that was reported in the media was simply it being renewed.
"IP infrastructure is definitely on its way, but trying to build up what happened as an anti-competitive move is just a search for a headline," he said.
Telstra will do anything to protect its assets. The ACCC appear to do exactly the same too.
Compared to the US and UK, we australians are being ripped off at an obscene level by telstra who are seeking any way at all to maintain their multi-billion dollar profits, including increasing line rentals just recently, their extreme anti-competitive broadband pricing deals and the constant and almost universal innacuracies on resedential phone bills (always to theiur favour), even after record profits.
Record profits should drive prices down, right?