Search may be Microsoft's next target, court told

Microsoft may be unlawfully wielding its desktop dominance to put the squeeze on search engines and on document formats like Adobe Acrobat, the state of Massachusetts claimed on Friday.

Massachusetts, the only state government still pursuing antitrust claims against Microsoft through the federal courts, made its allegations in a legal filing with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C.

"If Microsoft is taking steps to hobble the competitive effectiveness of these rival products and thereby supplant them, such serial killing of competing technologies is a serious and troubling prospect," read the three-page filing, which offered no details.

In addition, Massachusetts charged Microsoft with demonstrating "troubling business behavior" that could run afoul of existing court orders.

This move comes as the battle for Web search dominance is heating up, with Yahoo saying on Wednesday that it will drop Google's technology in favor of its own. At the same time, Microsoft is trying to find ways to make more money from Web searches by integrating such features more closely into its Windows operating system.

"Given the vague and unsubstantiated nature of the allegations, it's difficult to respond," Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake said on Friday. "However, we are always willing to sit down and discuss any issues of concern. We are firmly committed to firm compliance with the consent decree and all matters in antitrust law."

In 2002, Microsoft entered a consent decree with the Bush administration, which Kollar-Kotelly accepted, to settle the antitrust case. It also established a schedule for ongoing antitrust oversight of the company's actions.

On Thursday, Microsoft said it will voluntarily alter a music-purchasing feature in Windows XP in response to criticism from the U.S. Department of Justice. A joint filing from Microsoft and the Justice Department is expected to be submitted to Kollar-Kotelly later on Friday.

Massachusetts Attorney General Tom Reilly has objected to the 2002 peace accord in the antitrust dispute and has kept fighting.

In November, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., heard the state's arguments in favor of overturning the settlement but has not yet ruled. A decision is expected at any time.

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured