Red Hat CEO: Tired of Microsoft's Linux whining

In the past, when Microsoft put Linux down, the Linux community would rely upon its users to defend it in such popular open source forums as Slashdot. The Linux vendors would stay above the fray.

No more. Matthew J. Szulik, Red Hat CEO has taken off the kid gloves and come out swinging in a rebuttal to Microsoft's recent Linux putdowns.

It's not as though Szulik hasn't had provocation. In recent weeks, Microsoft big wigs have been lining up to take swings at Linux.

Doug Miller, Microsoft group product manager, opened up by saying of Linux, "there's very little value in free."

At Microsoft's January investment conference, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer proclaimed, "Linux is our enemy No. 1."

And, on Valentine's Day, Microsoft's chief of Windows, James Allchin, sent a very special valentine to Linux, proclaiming that open source is an "intellectual property destroyer," an innovation killer, and with a touch of the surreal, suggested that open source and therefore Linux, is un-American.

Szulik's exasperated response is, "There's so much FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) here, it's hard to know where to start."

But, then he does so by dividing Microsoft's arguments into three core contentions: Linux is immature; Linux threatens Microsoft's core business and open source destroys intellectual property and kills innovation.

Addressing the first issue, Szulik simply points to the market facts of life. He notes that International Data Corporation's (IDC) most recent server operating system study shows that Linux has now captured almost 30 percent of the market. And he can't resist saying though that "'blue screen of death' does not refer to Linux systems, but rather to the immature Windows products."

When it comes to Linux threatening Microsoft core's business, Szulik agrees, that's exactly what Linux is doing at the server operating system level.

From here, he moves into the high rhetoric of open source believers, "But even more dangerous, the open source model threatens the core business strategy of Microsoft domination, monopoly, total control and restricted consumer choices. History has shown that hegemonists and those who restrict freedom ultimately fail. Microsoft is on the wrong side of history."

Szulik finds Allchin's comments about open source's destruction of innovation to be "a bizarre accusation." Since then Microsoft has recast Allchin's comments, saying it's only one section of the GNU General Public License (GPL) that Allchin objects to.

To Szulik, it makes no difference. "Open source is creating tremendous intellectual property in software that is copyrighted through the GPL every day. With open source, the users own it, improve it and share it to everyone's benefit."

Indeed as far as Szulik is concerned, "I'd argue that a worldwide monopoly, enforced by business practices that a federal judge has found to be predatory and anti-competitive probably has more to do with killing innovation than anything the open source movement could ever do."

While Szulik is concerned about his business coming under attack by Microsoft, it's not because he fears failure. As he said, "It's nice to know that Linux and open source have grown so much, and moved so firmly into the mainstream of computing that Mighty Microsoft is scared." What troubles him concerns Linux and Red Hat having "to face such specious and unfounded arguments and accusations." But he also knows "which movement is on the right side. Freedom, access and individual rights always prevail in the long run."

And, so with fervour and a belief that right and history are on his side, not to mention superior technology, Szulik meets the Microsoft challenge with flags waving. Whatever else may be said about the Windows vs. Linux debate, let it never be said that it will be a dull fight between warring technocrats.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Microsoft's techno bable! soun ...Keith Styles -- 28/02/01

    Microsoft's techno bable! sounds like Huff & Puff.
    I am trying to decide which new OS to upgrade my PC. Linux is looking better every day.
    As a win98SE user with the latest updates, I am sick & tired of the endless daily maintenance, registry fixups, IE5 repairs, system freezeups & hangs caused by sloppy programming. It annoys me even more when I need assistance from Microsoft. They want to charge me to fix their problems!
    I don't believe WinME or Win2000 is that much better & they are certainly slower & more complex.
    I have a lot of friends who are of the same opinion! Get your act togeher Microsoft, before you start crying wolf.

    Keith... I have been using Mic ...Anonymous -- 28/02/01

    Keith... I have been using Microsoft products for over ten years. I too have finally gotten tired of less and less features in the product families and less ability in the modifying of how my computers operate. I am 47 years old and a Linux Newbie. I am having a blast being able change any feature on the destop and how the programs operate. As soon as I get more familiar with the Peguin os I am going to put the os on the rest of my home PC's.
    Currently I am using Mandrake and Red Hat. Out of the two, Mandrake was the easiest to get up and running, Red Hat seems to be a little (not much) faster but harder to get up and running. Mandrake just about does everything for you.
    Yeah, Microsoft has a lot to worry about... just for one simple fact...
    Microsoft Suxs...

    Robert
    EP TX 32 USA
    Have a Happy Penguin Day..!

    Keith,I have a small LAN in my ...Tom C. -- 01/03/01

    Keith,

    I have a small LAN in my apartment and I run mostly LINUX and I also run Solaris 8 on my Ultra 1.

    Ever notice now under any version of Windows the hard disk light is always on? It is perpetually paging? Disk fragmentation slows it down too and you have to wast time and not to mention wear and tear on the disk from all of the paging and defragging....

    Unless you are running very low RAM, you rarely see such constant paging on Linux. Linux keeps alot of data in RAM, and as long as you have a small UPS to protect against power dips, you are fine. Less wear and tear on the disks and a faster OS.

    Also, with Linux you get rid of stupid drive letters in favor of a more logical tree structure, in which any other filesystems on other disks or remote machines (NFS or SAMBA) can be mounted anywhere, looking like local storage!

    You can turn a Pentium or 486 class machine into a great fileserver. One of my main servers is an old Gateway P75 tower that I upgraded the CPU with a 200MMX Overdrive, added some RAM, 10gb EISA disk, a scsi card, 9gb scsi disk, 24X scsi CDROM, ISA network card - instant server running Redhat 6.1 with updates and the latest 2.4.2 kernel. She serves files like a pro, serves as a second workstation, and rips and stores my mp3 files.

    Life is wonderful and good without Bill Gates to mess it up! Try running Win2k on that server and it wouldn't be nearly as fast or stable.

    Linux/UNIX is just better. Period.

    Indeed, Microsoft is fearful o ...Anonymous -- 01/03/01

    Indeed, Microsoft is fearful of Linux, and so am I. At this point in time, Open Source is GREAT! It provides the flexibility for end-users to make manipulations to work out bugs without the need to wait for a patch from the developer. Keeping in mind, however, this revolution is only relatively new to the market, yet is spreading at one of the greatest speeds seen in IT history.

    If Open Source becomes the norm for IT software, what will happen to the jobs of the software developers who spend many pain-staking days behind computer screen, coding away, who only asked for a respectable pay rate for their work? Sure, I KNOW, Red Hat pays around $50k/yr to their developers. But, considering that Red Hat is possibly the largest Open Source company, doesn't this set in anyone elses mind that this will be the highest rate of pay you will get in an Open Source development industry?

    Thats comprable to companies such as Microsoft who is possibly the largest Closed Source software co., which offer salaries in the many hundreds of thousands. How is this fair to the developers?? Sure, the other techo's will still benefit, they will probably get pay rises because of the reduced operating costs - at the expense of exploiting developers!

    And you can say as often as you like that everyone said the same about VCR's, but, am I the only one who realises that you pay for VCR's and videos, but not open source software??

    Open-source supporters have become so much of a close-knit group that it is nearly a cult to which people are afraid to speak out on. Many of the people in these tight-knit groups have probably only had their opinions changed to agree with it, because it is the "mainstream" thing to do.

    Encourage open-source software as much as you like for all I care, but just think about the many jobs you will be destroying, especially, if you are a developer yourself!

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured