Personal Net use at work: Should you pay?

commentary So, work's a bit slow.

Your mind wanders and you start thinking about updating that digital music collection. You head over to mp3s4free.net and spend 30 minutes downloading some free music. Well pleased with your beefed up catalogue of music files, you wearily turn back to your spreadsheets. Next morning, you come in to work to see a small white envelope. It is a bill, with two items. Bandwidth and time costs for the period during which you were exploiting mp3s4free.net's offerings. As you choke on your cappuccino, you notice a second envelope from the human resources department. It contains a typewritten note inviting you to explore the vast career possibilities that lie beyond your present employer. Immediately.

This scenario leapt to mind this week as a result of two stories: an Australian company enthusiastically touting its bandwidth monitoring system and the long list of government departments, both here and in the United States, whose employees visited the mp3s4free Web site during a 12-day period in October last year. (According to the investigators involved, the log files seized to date site do not actually show users were downloading anything they shouldn't have been. Apparently they only showed "actions that referred to downloads, not actually downloads". Hmmmmmmmmmm.) Now while the bandwidth monitoring company's plans reek of overkill, the number of government agencies whose employees visited mp3s4free.net in less than two weeks indicates (on face value) that acceptable use policies regarding the Internet are being widely disregarded. (Of course, if there are legitimate government projects in Australia and the US that require visits to mp3s4free.net, I am happy to be corrected. Be curious to know what justifiable interests the Reserve Bank of Australia or the US Department of Agriculture would have in the Web site, though).

Should employers be able to bill employees for personal Internet usage? What punishments should be meted out to employees who breach acceptable use policies (and how should those punishments be graded depending on the nature of the offence? E-mail us at edit@zdnet.com.au and let us know.

  • By the way, on the subject of bandwidth and the Internet, it was interesting to catch the latest in the brawl between Telstra and Unwired over the telecommunications powerhouse's ADSL coverage in Sydney. After being assailed with Telstra's legal might, Unwired has agreed not to repeat representations that Telstra's ADSL coverage in the NSW capital is around the 75 percent mark. (Telstra insists the true figure is closer to 96 percent). However, after ZDNet Australia  published the story, broadband industry observers immediately questioned the Telstra figure, saying many people within the supposed coverage area were being denied access to ADSL due to incompatible equipment (pair gain etcetera). If you're within a coverage area, yet can't get broadband Internet, we'd love to hear from you at the above e-mail address.
  • Advertisement

    Talkback 4 comments

      Charge for bandwidth abuse, an ...Anonymous -- 11/02/05

      Charge for bandwidth abuse, and write up. Fire? No unless they are behind on their pile of work to do. Some jobs are wait and then work overtime, they should have more freedom to browse but not download. I am often required to skip lunch and work oddball hours, I take work home for no extra compensation. so I use the internet to browse things when I am not deluged, and I feel good about it.

      Ppl should be free to browse s ...Anonymous -- 12/02/05

      Ppl should be free to browse sites at work, but not use it for any illegal or inappropriate activity. Downloading music / movies at work is not correct, nor is it correct to do at home for that matter (unless you pay for it).

      For example: If ppl access their hotmail from work, I think that is okay. Because what about ppl who take home work, and need to use the internet - can they charge the company for internet use and bandwidth?

      No! they should not be aloud t ...Anonymous -- 12/02/05

      No! they should not be aloud to do this on company time,they should be focused on the job at hand ,No slackers,cost corperation $ and cent's,RMF Canada.

      If you were smart you would as ...Anonymous -- 15/02/05

      If you were smart you would ask if it would be ok to do so before doing so. Browsing web sites shouldn't be a problem, but downloading music/programs for your own use is a different story.

    Add your opinion

    Latest Videos

    Sponsored content

    Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

    Blogs

    • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
      Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
    • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
      In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
    • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
      The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
    • More blogs »

    Tags

    Back to top

    Featured