P2P group: We'll pay girl's RIAA bill

By John Borland, Special to ZDNet
11 September 2003 08:30 AM
Tags: 12, riaa, girl, year, p2p, old, peer, mother
A peer-to-peer group says it will cover costs for a 12-year-old New York girl who agreed to pay record labels US$2,000 to settle a file-swapping lawsuit.

P2P United, a peer-to-peer industry trade group that includes Grokster, StreamCast Networks, Limewire and other file-trading software companies, said Wednesday it had offered to reimburse Brianna Lahara and her mother's payment to the Recording Industry Association of America. Lahara's mother agreed Tuesday to settle copyright infringement charges on behalf of her daughter.

"We do not condone copyright infringement, but someone has to draw the line to call attention to a system that permits multinational corporations with phenomenal financial and political resources to strong-arm 12-year-olds and their families in public housing the way this sorry episode dramatises," said Adam Eisgrau, the executive director of P2P United.

Eisgrau said he had not yet been in direct contact with Lahara or her mother.

In the few days since Lahara's unexpected rise into the public eye, the schoolgirl's case has become a cause celebre for RIAA critics, who say the recording industry's wave of lawsuits against file-traders is misguided.

According to a New York Post profile, Lahara is a 12-year-old honors student who lives in public housing. Her name turned up in one of the 261 lawsuits filed by the record industry group on Monday.

Lahara's US$2,000 settlement was the first announced deal of what is expected to be many out-of-court agreements. RIAA President Cary Sherman said Monday that a handful of settlement agreements, averaging around US$3,000 apiece, were already being negotiated.

In a statement released jointly by the RIAA and Lahara on Tuesday, Lahara said she was "very sorry" for what she had done. According to the RIAA, the girl's computer had illegally been sharing more than 1,000 songs through the Kazaa software.

"We understand now that file-sharing the music was illegal," her mother, Sylvia Torres, added in the statement. "You can be sure Brianna won't be doing it anymore."

The RIAA said the deal with Lahara satisfied its goal of sending a message to file swappers.

"As this case illustrates, parents need to be aware of what their children are doing on their computers," Mitch Bainwol, the group's new chief executive, said in the statement.

Previous targets of RIAA lawsuits have sometimes found financial help from the file-swapping community.

Daniel Peng, a Princeton University junior who agreed to settle file-trading charges with the RIAA for US$15,000 earlier this year, has raised nearly US$10,000 toward covering his costs from public donations made through PayPal and other online payment services, according to his Web site.

Eisgrau said P2P United had no plans to pay other file-swappers' legal fees. The recently founded group plans to lobby in Washington, D.C., for policies such as compulsory music licensing on peer-to-peer networks, which would force the music companies to allow songs to be traded on file-trading networks in return for some payment to copyright holders.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    wake up to yourselves, Lahara ...withheld -- 11/09/03

    wake up to yourselves, Lahara broke the law. I guess being a honours student she was unable to read the copyright label.

    Just remember don't do the crime unless you are prepared to do the crime.

    Lastly, if she was so poor that she was forced to download mp3, who did she afford a PC.

    Nice gesture but bad message. ...Anonymous -- 11/09/03

    Nice gesture but bad message.

    1) RIAA sues some kid
    2) Someone comes to the rescue
    3) Kid suffers no hardship
    4) RIAA is seen, by the public, as slightly less evil than before step 2

    RIAA gets bad publicity through suing people for more money than they can afford. If those getting sued can afford to pay, then no-one will care about what the RIAA is doing to people's lives.

    So in a way I've said "let the kid suffer". But the point is anyone who sues a regular person over some imaginary loss deserves the bad publicity that comes with the money. P2P United have deflected some of that bad publicity but none of the money. That's what bugs me.

    If the RIAA cannot price the C ...Anonymous -- 11/09/03

    If the RIAA cannot price the CD lower, then you are going to have copying and file sharing.

    If you lower the prices, then you will STOP file sharing.

    I think that RIAA are being unreasonable by stopping music to be copies and then keeping the price the same. It is one or the other. You cannot have both !!

    I think the RIAA don't like the IT industry !

    Why doesnt every one then as a ...Anonymous -- 12/09/03

    Why doesnt every one then as a public protest
    refuse to buy any CD's from any music chain.

    If everyone who used to purchase a few CD's a week
    stopped buying for 3 months - 6 months.

    This would show the RIAA / record companies that
    they need the consumer for them to exist.
    It might even make them drop the price.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Can not-so-smart meters help the NBN?
    It was interesting to witness Conroy's recent enthusiasm to spruik the NBN's role in supporting the Smart Grid, Smart City initiative. What a pity that Conroy hadn't yet seen the damning report from the Victorian auditor-general about that state's smart-meter roll-out.
  • Array Can the Telco Reform Act be win-win?
    In the second of our two programs looking at the Senate Inquiry into the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Bill, we hear from shareholders, bureaucrats and industry groups.
  • Array Has New Zealand's smiling assassin delivered?
    One year into its tenure, how has the new New Zealand Government performed on issues of technology and telecommunications?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured