Napster clones under attack by NMPA

A group representing music publishers and songwriters on Tuesday filed a federal suit against some makers of file-swapping software, marking the latest in a string of legal tangles over copyright infringement on the Internet.

The National Music Publisher's Association (NMPA), which represents the owners of most songs published in the United States, said it filed suit in Los Angeles federal court against the parent companies of file-swapping services MusicCity, Grokster and Kazaa

"This lawsuit seeks to protect the rights of music creators from flagrant piracy," Edward Murphy, president of the NMPA, said in a statement. "As the legitimate market for online music develops, however, it is also about fundamental fairness to the music services that wish to comply with the law by taking licences."

The lawsuit is the latest chapter in an ongoing saga aimed at stopping consumers from trading copyrighted musical and other works over the Internet through peer-to-peer networks, a practice popularised by Napster. In October, the Recording Industry Association of America and the Motion Picture Association of America sued MusicCity, Grokster and Kazaa in a move to prevent people from trading copies of music and films over the Web.

The copyright holders, so far, have been victorious against a handful of companies, effectively stopping file trading on Napster, shutting down Scour and placing Aimster in financial straits. The music and film industries' new targets may be harder to rein in. While Napster and Scour ran services that assisted Web surfers in their search for copyrighted works, MusicCity merely makes software that allows individuals to swap computer files.

Although the NMPA has joined record labels and artists in many of the suits targeting file-swapping services and software makers, to date it has shown greater willingness to settle than some of its legal partners. In September, the publishers struck a deal with Napster, which agreed to pay US$26 million to settle the dispute.

MusicCity said it has not yet been notified by the NMPA about Tuesday's lawsuit, but added that it is "vigorously" defending all legal actions against it.

"I'm learning that in this brave new world of lawsuits that there appears to be no one that has to notify you," said Steve Griffin, chief executive of StreamCast Networks, which handles the MusicCity site. "It saddens me that we can't have a business dialogue before people think they could go off and sue companies."

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    Whats next MIRC,ICQ ??????? Wh ...justgeoff -- 22/11/01

    Whats next MIRC,ICQ ???????
    Where will it end....
    They (the music companies) dont realise that if they shut one down another will open.

    You can not stop people from sharing files.

    Next MIRC,ICQ ?????? Me MeeM MeeeeeeeM -- 10/04/08 (in reply to #120007062)

    Pffft just go away

    Randomo UuUuUUUUUuUUuu -- 10/04/08 (in reply to #320099440)

    Hi little people =D writting on this is fun and you should realy consider that no one cares =X lol much muhahahahahahaha pp

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured