Microsoft targets Linux defectors with discounts

Microsoft said it plans to offer smaller companies a more lenient licensing plan intended to stem any potential defections to Linux or other open-source software.

The software giant on Tuesday said it will launch the new plan, called Open Value, early next year. The new program is part of Microsoft's controversial Licensing 6 volume licensing program, which was put in place this summer.

Many Microsoft customers--particularly smaller companies--have resisted Licensing 6 and its "Software Assurance" program for buying software under two- or three-year maintenance contracts. As many as two thirds of Microsoft customers either rejected the plan or bought partial upgrades under the older Licensing 5 program, analysts say.

Gartner estimates the program raised a majority of customer fees anywhere from 33 percent to 107 percent. After two delays, Microsoft fully enacted Licensing 6 in August.

Smaller businesses, which are the target of Open Value, make up the majority of companies which declined to sign up for Licensing 6.

"Licensing 6's penetration into the (small and medium-sized business) market was not as well accepted as Microsoft would like it to have been," said Gartner analyst Alvin Park.

Under Open Value, smaller businesses can sign up for Software Assurance and spread payments out over a three-year period. This payment option could attract many cash-strapped operations looking to keep current with Microsoft technology, without paying hefty upfront fees.

Analysts said the new Open Value program could help prevent small businesses from switching to competing products, such as Linux, Lindows or StarOffice.

"With Open Value, Microsoft is doing everything they can to keep small and mid-size businesses, which are the most likely for further defection," said Yankee Group analyst Laura DiDio.

"We certainly hope our customers will stay on board with Microsoft products. And we recognise that our products have to provide compelling value and that (small and medium-sized business) customers have their own distinct business needs," Rebecca LaBrunerie, a Microsoft licensing program manager, said in an e-mail to CNET News.com.

"Licensing 6.0 addressed primarily the needs of larger enterprises, and...we needed to circle back around to meet the needs of (small and medium-sized business) customers. The Open Value payment plan is one step in that direction," said LaBrunerie.

Park said that under the Open Value plan, "these companies won't be able to look at alternatives. They won't be able to look at competing products."

Locking customers in is a key component of Licensing 6, analysts say. Under Microsoft's older licensing program, companies could buy software upgrades at any time. But Microsoft removed these "version upgrades" under Licensing 6, moving companies to an annuity model where they pay up front under two- or three-year upgrade contracts.

Companies signing up for the annuity program would be highly unlikely to consider alternatives during the contract period, since they have already paid in advance for upgrades, analysts said.

Still, the "pay before you buy" program met with stiff resistance from a majority of Microsoft customers.

"It looks like only...25 percent to 30 percent (of customers) went for Licensing 6," Didio said. "You still have two thirds that didn't sign up."

Gartner came to slightly different conclusions based on discussions with hundreds of large businesses and computer dealers. The market research firm estimates one third of Microsoft customers refused to sign up for Licensing 6, while another third "bought upgrades on part of their licenses," Park said.

Microsoft's long-term problem is wooing smaller businesses. Those companies have the most financial incentive to seek out alternatives, particularly given recent economic woes. They can also switch technology vendors more easily than large companies, said DiDio.

"These folks are feeling pretty disenfranchised," DiDio said. "Fifty percent of the market are small and mid-sized businesses with under 1,500 users--many with under 1,000 users. So that's half your installed base."

Didio sees these smaller companies as ripe candidates for StarOffice running on Windows or even Windows replacements such as Linux and Lindows. Because of the licensing terms for these competing products, smaller companies can install the software for a fraction of what it costs to obtain Microsoft upgrades under Software Assurance.

"Take a look at their infrastructure," Didio said. "If you have a company with 1,000 PCs or 500 PCs, they're going to be in centralised office locations. It's not so difficult for those folks that do not have a huge infrastructure to rip out and replace Microsoft and switch to something else."

Analysts couldn't say how many small or medium-businesses might take advantage of Open Value. But they noted Microsoft has reason to be concerned about further defections.

While Microsoft slowly ramps up Open Value, the company is offering another incentive aimed at small businesses. Until Jan. 31, 2003, the company is offering zero-percent financing for one of its Software Assurance programs targeted at small businesses.

The slow ramp up for Open Value is so Microsoft can prep dealers that will be selling Open Value licenses. Allowing dealers to handle Open Value--as opposed to Microsoft itself--makes sense for two reasons, said Park: Smaller businesses tend to buy products through dealers and Microsoft wants to give something back to keep dealers loyal to Microsoft. With Licensing 6, Microsoft took lucrative "Enterprise Agreements" away from dealers, selling them direct instead.

"Microsoft wants to give something back to the (sales) channel, by letting them sell Open Value licenses," Park said. "They really took a lot of money out of the channel's pocket, because they got a piece of the action on Enterprise Agreements."

Park described "a company-wide" component of Open Value as a "baby Enterprise Agreement." Under this option, small companies would receive a huge discounts for buying licenses in bulk rather than piece by piece.

"Microsoft would like nothing better for companies with 5 to 500 employees to sign up for the companywide option and get Office, Windows, client-access licenses--the whole thing," Park said.

"That's an even better way to lock people into not some, but all Microsoft products for three years," he added.

Talkback 7 comments

    Sorry to late, we are changing ...Anonymous -- 27/11/02

    Sorry to late, we are changing to Linux and this message is posted from a new Linux desktop.

    "Analysts said the new Op ...Anonymous -- 27/11/02

    "Analysts said the new Open Value program could help prevent small businesses from switching to competing products, such as Linux, Lindows or StarOffice."

    This is definite proof that ZDNet and CNet (owners of ZDNet) don't know what they're talking about. Lindows is a Linux distribution, albeit a crippled one. If you are going to mention it explicitly then why not mention Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian (all three of which have far greater market share than Lindows) or any of the other distributions?

    I have no intention of changin ...Anonymous -- 27/11/02

    I have no intention of changing from Win 98 to XP because of the expensive licencing problems. I am investigating Linux as I suspect that Microsoft will soon no longer support Win 98 as well as Win 95.

    Why Lindows, when users could ...Anonymous -- 27/11/02

    Why Lindows, when users could run Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE or some other type of real Linux?

    Here is a hint.

    Number 1 distro for servers is RedHat

    Number 1 distro for desktops is Mandrake

    I have to agree with one of th ...Anonymous -- 13/12/02

    I have to agree with one of the anonymous responses, I would not upgrade from W98 to XP if I was given it and 36 months free support. I only keep W98 & MS Office to produce databases and automated applications for friends and customers. Many of them I have managed to convince them to at least look at Linux and they have been generally impressed. Linux has come along way in the last 12 months to 2 years. While it has some way to go with "ease"
    of office automation, given some of the packages available, it has the ability to equal if not surpass, some MS products. While I personally do not profess to be a guru, I have performed a number of Linux installs on both servers and desktop PCs and had very little problem. If you put MS 2K Server and a boxed or unboxed Linux distro side by side the Linux distro would get my vote every time.

    Heck, if small to medium-sized ...Sum Yung Gai -- 30/12/02

    Heck, if small to medium-sized business want a solid IT platform, they should look at what the City of Largo, Florida, here in the USA, has done. Their IT shop support over 800 employees, including the secretaries, with the Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) running on Red Hat Linux 7.2. Also, in Portland, Oregon (USA), Riverdale High School, and several others in that area, have switched to LTSP, slightly tweaked for educational purposes.

    LTSP allows the use of cheap, older computers as thin clients(Pentium-133's are overkill for this) for the LTSP servers. Both organizations run OpenOffice.org 1.0 and Mozilla, as well as rdesktop. Largo also runs WordPerfect 8 for GNU/Linux, whereas Portland leverages The GIMP and various educational software. I did an install of LTSP this weekend as a test, and it's actually kind of easy, especially if you use the ISO images hosted at www.k12ltsp.org. The one thing you really need on the LTSP server is lots of RAM (I'd say 3 to 4GB for a couple hundred users running OpenOffice and Mozilla simultaneously), but RAM's ridiculously cheap compared to a bunch of Windows/MSOffice licenses.

    Maintenance, at both organizations, has come way down. Instead of running around fixing Windows "DLL Hell" problems, issues with printing, and so on, their respective IT staffs have silent beepers, can think about how to save yet more money, answer users' questions without being in a rush, and actually keep tabs on security.

    LTSP is what we, as Free Software advocates, should be marketing to small/medium sized business whenever we get the chance. They would save a whole lot of money and get a much more stable platform to use.

    Check out http://www.k12ltsp.org and http://www.ltsp.org.

    Be leary of Microsoft's License Agreements Anonymous -- 02/08/05

    Microsoft makes promises that it does not keep. They "pretend" to be flexible but like dangling carrots to make a deal look worthwhile and they supposedly want to "help" the client with the "best pricing" - but beware, they will change pricing when license agreements are ready to be signed. They will not honor pricing given if they ahve something "different" in the "real" system.

    Make sure you have everything in writing from them, with a dates and a guarantee from someone that must HONOR their promiseses form a legal standpoint. Make sure you have someone from legal review it. DO not relaease any information to them - figure things out on your own.

    Based on my experience, do all of the work re licensing on your own. Get in writing from any vendor that they work for YOU not Microsoft. Get it in writing that all communications to forwarded and shared must be approved before doing so or they are in breach of contract.

    This comes from experience.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured