Microsoft hits back at stolen tech allegations

Microsoft has denied it used stolen intellectual property to build Media Player 9 and has called Burst.com's account of last week's trial on the matter "inaccurate" and "groundless".

Microsoft was ordered by a U.S. judge last week to produce thousands of e-mails as part of an investigation into whether the software giant stole intellectual property from Burst.com and used it in Media Player 9.

Jim Desler, PR manager at Microsoft Corporate Communications told ZDNet UK: "Microsoft vehemently denies Burst's allegations and contends that the technology that is part of our Media Player 9 was developed by Microsoft engineers."

Desler expressed surprise at Burst's account of the court hearing: "Their fundamental premise -- that there were missing e-mails from a specific period of time -- is simply wrong." Instead, he said, the companies "discussed a routine discovery issue arising from the fact that not every email sent or received gets saved".

According to Desler, the judge "simply directed us to do a more thorough search of our backup files to search for any e-mails that, as a matter of business routine, were not saved elsewhere."

In addition, Desler said that Microsoft is an intellectual property company that respects the intellectual property rights of others. "We dedicate tremendous time and resources to technology innovation and development."

"Like many large companies, from time to time we are the target of groundless claims and/or litigation," he added.

Microsoft was responding to comments from Richard Lang, chief executive of Burst.com, who told ZDNet UK that two years after becoming a Microsoft partner, the software giant tried to buy the company's technology for US$1 million. Around a year after the offer was turned down, Lang said Microsoft announced a "third generation video streaming technology", which appeared to be based on Burst.com's technology.

"In early 2002, Bill Gates made the official introduction -- they called the product Windows Media Player 9 -- which in our view incorporated our patents without a licence," Lang said.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    God forbid anyone say that Mic ...Anonymous -- 05/09/03

    God forbid anyone say that Micro$oft ever stole code from anyone. They are whole, the cream of the crop, the best of the best. God has sent Bill Gate$ as His Second Son.
    Time will show them the value of consumers' support. I just wonder when consumer's rights will kick in.

    Its been proven in the past th ...Anonymous -- 06/09/03

    Its been proven in the past that Microsoft has stolen technology from others, just ask Stacker about their disk compression technology.

    This is another examply of M$ trying to take a small company and completely screw them over. The only problem is Burst found some lawyers who agreed to work for free and take a (generous) cut of the payout. And I'm guessing those lawyers made an excellent decision.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured