It's official: Govt backs Gershon "in full"

By Liam Tung, ZDNet.com.au
24 November 2008 05:41 PM
Tags: contractor, gershon, tanner, ict, government, sir, agency, peter

Federal Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner today said the government would implement the recommendations of Sir Peter Gershon's ICT Review 'in full', including cutting its IT contractor workforce by half.

"The staged roll-out of the review's recommendation will commence immediately in line with the implementation strategy proposed by Sir Peter," Tanner said today in a statement.

"This decision represents the most significant change in the use and management of ICT in the Australian Government to date. We will act decisively in applying Sir Peter's recommendations," he added.

Razor: Gershon and Tanner

Sir Peter Gershon and Lindsay Tanner.
(Credit: Brian Hartigan)

One of the top issues addressed in the review was agencies' reliance on IT contractors, which Gershon reported cost on average $186,000 per annum or twice the amount a public sector employee could expect under the Financial Management and Accountability (FMA) Act.

The review claimed that up to 20 per cent of staff in some agencies had been converted from permanent to contractors, which affected agencies' skill base but also posed a risk since contractors stood outside the standard performance management system. Gershon estimated that 23 per cent of the government's current ICT workforce were contractors.

"This is a turning point, rebalancing the highly-decentralised ICT administration in government and focusing on efficient and effective ICT expenditure and management," Tanner said.

But while Gershon had recommended making the cuts to contractor levels by 2010, the government has given itself to the end of 2011 in order to avoid disrupting current project schedules.

The savings to come from reducing contractors and Gershon's broader recommendations are expected to be $400 million a year, but will only kick in once the changes are fully implemented, according to the minister's statement.

"This savings exercise will be done in a way that does not impede service delivery to citizens and businesses. Reductions averaging 15 per cent for larger agencies and 7.5 per cent for mid-sized agencies are expected and achievable," said Tanner.

Norman Lacy, executive director of ITCRA — an organisation which represents Australian technology recruiters, denied the government over-relied on contractors and disagreed with the reported average cost of them.

At today's announcement Lacy predicted a flight of contractors to countries where they were still in demand.

"The reality is that these people are very much in demand in other countries. There will be a flight to those counties to continue their contracting because they will continue to earn at the rate they're earning now," he told ZDNet.com.au.

Lacy said that a beneficiary of the government's contractor cull would be the private sector, which has in recent years competed with the public sector for skilled IT staff.

"Look, the private sector in Australia will be rejoicing. They don't have to compete with the government for skills. They will be able to engage them much more easily because the Commonwealth has walked away from a significant source of highly skilled ICT professionals," he said.

Advertisement

Talkback 21 comments

    No chance..... Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    For this to happen the Govt will have to employ 10 permanent IT staff, on average, per week. That is impossible given that it takes over 6 months, in some cases, to employ 1 staff member. Stupid politicians making stupid and uninformed decisions, happens all the time.

    Hypocrisy from ITCRA Tony Healy -- 25/11/08

    Not that long ago Norman Lacy claimed Australia faced disaster because of a lack of skilled IT contractors. If that was true, he should be welcoming the availability of more contractors freed up by this decision.

    In 2006, arguing for more 457 visas with his good mates at the ACS, he claimed Australian IT people were paid too much. Now he's worried that pay rates might go down.

    Maybe ITCRA and the ACS should get their stories straight.

    ITCRA Anonymous -- 25/11/08 (in reply to #320116993)

    Lacy has now gone from ITCRA to ICA - from supporting scumbag recruitment parasites to being an advocate for contractors - hence his change of tune. He'll probably have no effect in that area as well.

    farcical Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    so the government tries to screw over IT again with these clown's recommendations... meanwhile the government does its best to prop up the car and building industry by handing them money – anyone remember the IT industry getting a government prop-up during the dot com crash?

    Living a lie Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    I believe the basis for the Gershon report is valid to a certain extent, but expecting a government agency to manage all IT for the Australian Government is only going to add a layer of bureacracy to the process, and relocating this capability will require INCREASES in government spending in the short term. Now is not the time to be implementing this scheme.

    It would be surprising if a government employee could perform as well as consultants that specialise in IT. Has anyone questioned the management layers (employees) that allow pseudo-contractors (contractors who closely resemble employees) to proliferate in the public service? I think it also interesting that other costs of employees such as HR departments, exorbitant super, overtime, sick leave, annual leave, compassionate leave, maternity leave, paternity leave, et al were not factored into the comparison - these factors, at least in smaller organisations make contractors CHEAPER than employees...

    lies? Anonymous -- 25/11/08 (in reply to #320117004)

    The overall aim is to take the experience they were having through consultants and move them inside.

    They will have greater control, less turnover, and they can manage them more effectively. Industry tends to swing from not using enough contractors and specialist consultants to having too many.

    Hes not saying get rid of them all, but basic IT services should not need to be contracted out.

    Cost of APS staff Anonymous -- 25/11/08 (in reply to #320117004)

    EXACTLY.........also you can only ever get a few hours a day of work out of most public servants and they only turn up for half the time with all their leave - maybe there should be a Gershon Review into public servant work comitment. You could probably axe 50% of the APS.

    What is a contractor Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    There is no definition in Gershons report as to what a contractor is. Is it a person who works for an outsourced IT provider? A consultant from Accenture workingon a project or an independent doing a job the department can't seem to get a fulltime person to do. And why is the ACS so keen on supporting this review? Especially as it does nothing to address the loss of the professional IT career in the public service and the retirement of experienced IT staff.

    ACS Anonymous -- 25/11/08 (in reply to #320117016)

    When did the ACS ever do anything for IT people? Do they still exist? Had'nt noticed.

    what is ACS? Anonymous -- 26/11/08 (in reply to #320117021)

    please confirm what ACS is - are you taking about Australian Customs Service? or something else? sorry for asking dumb questions.....

    ACS Anonymous -- 26/11/08 (in reply to #320117137)

    In this context I mean the Australian Computer Society
    regards

    I agree Anonymous -- 25/11/08 (in reply to #320117016)

    Here's the beginning of the smoke and mirrors as the bureaucrats work out how to hire externals and not call them contractors. Should take about 12 months I'd guess.

    Who cares what the ACS says, thinks or does.

    May the force be with you Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    It is no surprise that there is a lot of dead wood in the public service. Problem is that IT is a specialist profession and the contractors are the only ones doing any work. Culling IT contractors just harms the wider Australian community as projects grind to a halt and services are jeopardised. Mr Tanner may think that applying a blanket approach to IT is clever but let's just wait and see the career ending ramifications of this astoundingly superficial and un-scientific review. With the government providing handouts to "needy families" facing the impending recession the timing of axing contractors from the APS is interesting - but then again the APS doesnt really consider that contractors have either families or lives worth worrying about.

    Not again... Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    For sure 2009 will be an interesting year for heaps of contractors in Canberra – yet another ideological driven structural change to government ICT. Anyone remember the introduction of outsourcing? Fifteen years ago, ICT wasn’t “core” government business and could therefore be efficiently moved to the private sector. Now of course it is “core” business and must be brought back in house immediately to yield massive savings. What a pathetic joke.

    The reality is that the government will continue to pay in one way or another. If it wants to implement policy and keep the welfare wheels turning it’s going to need ICT. I expect most agencies will simply hire the big multinationals to do anything new, try to ramp up their in-house staff for BAU (and probably fail), and sweep favoured contractors under the table with some smoke and mirror arrangements. I think a lot of contractors will move to the multinationals in the end.

    It’s still going to be a ridiculous, time and money wasting circus act for a couple of years, but then it is Canberra.

    Thankyou Sir Peter Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    Great news for us contractors! The APS will do as instructed and cut contract numbers initially. Those masquerading as IT specialists will either go into a more suitable line of work (DJ, kebab shop etc) and the others will become public servants. Those real IT professionals that come from interstate or overseas will go back there as the picnic is now over. The remaining IT professionals will either join firms or band together to seek work, and any left will increase their rates as Canberra becomes the pariah of the IT industry. In the end contractors will become more desirable and more expensive - just what we have been waiting for !!!!! This has to be the best example of the expression shooting yourself in the foot.

    It's good you're positive Anonymous -- 26/11/08 (in reply to #320117045)

    You're probably right in the long run but rates are going to fall for certain. It'll be a market correction while all the pointless reshuffle goes on. Most public servants will adopt their default stance - no decisions, no new projects, no new contracts.

    dept of education govt agencies Anonymous -- 25/11/08

    do investigate dept of education, there are contractors doing jobs that can be replaced by permie, at rates of $90-100/hr for over 7-9 years!

    Envy? Anonymous -- 26/11/08 (in reply to #320117065)

    Sounds like the politics of envy. Anyway the market will sort out the "problem" regardless. Remember these contractors are taking on a whole lot more risk that your average APS. In my experience, envious APS are jealous as hell but too scared to go contract for themselves. Really they've missed the boat now - mediocrity is their chosen future.

    Hi Ho.... its overseas I go Anonymous -- 26/11/08

    Have been thinking about working OS, now I have the push. Good luck oz govt, try delivering without people..........idiots

    Productivity Anonymous -- 26/11/08

    Has productivity been considered? Turning contractors into permanents means more personal leaves, annual leaves, public holidays, sick leaves, all of which permanent staff enjoy, but contractors are not paid for. It is our nature to compare, and what is the stimulus for people to have higher productivity at similar rewards? What would the square numbers of savings be when measured against loss of productivity? Every department tried to get rid of contractors before, several times, why do they still use contractors? There should be a study measuring the departments that do not use contractors, such as ABS, against those that use contractors.

    Craig Emerson - empty suit Anonymous -- 26/11/08

    Where is the Minister for Independent contractors? Probably under his desk. Looks like the labour governments appointment of someone to look out for the rights of independent contractors is just another political sham. Must remember that at election time.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured