Boards undervalue IT: Boyles

By Steven Deare, ZDNet Australia
23 January 2006 02:44 PM
Tags: boyles, anz, cio, board, boards, technology, bank, cut
Company directors undervalue their IT staff and still believe that automation will help them cut IT budgets without affecting their core business, according to David Boyles, chief information officer of ANZ Bank from 1998-2004.

Boyles, who now advises chief executives and other C-level managers on technology management issues, told ZDNet Australia that boards of directors were increasingly asking whether IT budgets could be cut.

"It's one of the most common questions I'm being asked by people I work with -- can we cut the IT budget to save costs? [They'll say] 'All this stuff is automated, so we'll be fine'," said Boyles.

However many company directors did not completely realise the value of their IT infrastructure to their company's operations, according to Boyles.

"They need to ask themselves, if I cut the [technology] staff to the bone, and the systems stop working for one day, what is the cost to the organisation?"

With the constant increase in online payment services, some big businesses could probably operate for a short time without sales staff more easily than without their e-commerce operations, he said.

"This job [CIO] has the most exposure of any in the company," said Boyles. "And if your retail site is down, someone will calculate what is the loss to the company? I'm not trying to say that IT should run the company, but how often do we have the CIO talking to the board?"

The problem could be partially solved if more [former] technology executives were included on corporate boards, according to Boyles: "How many ex-CIOs do you see on large corporate boards… You get attorneys, HR directors, COOs, but where are the tech people?"

In another claim that could raise the ire of the non-technology savvy, Boyles said he believed it was rare for new technology to be the root cause of project failure. He cited a situation a few years ago when several of the big banks purchased enterprise resource planning software.

"Now I'm not going to name names, but one [bank] had a near employee revolt, and one had a big cost overrun… I'm willing to bet that one of those banks blamed it on the technology."

According to Boyles, the blame for many failed projects lies with project management processes rather than the technology selected to carry out the task.

"What I ask is, 'if it was the technology, was it really the root cause? The root cause is back with the risk management and the steering committee of the project. It's all part of the governance of IT."

Boyles said the software used in most major projects was usually pre-packaged, which is generally not complicated to roll out: "You're telling me that there are all these installations around the world and the software's not any good? I don't think it's the software."

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    IT people brushed aside joe -- 24/01/06 (in reply to #120127828)

    I say, let their systems crash. If IT is so not important, then don't use the computer or its services at all. and i wanna see how a huge successful business is run, then again these mere IT illiterates will never understand. all they see is a screen and think and see words and pictures magically appear on the screen.

    Re: IT people brushed aside Anonymous -- 31/01/06 (in reply to #120127829)

    I completely agree with this. Many large corporations have been using the power of IT to generate new business opportunities, automate business processes, simplify tasks, etc. The all invested heavily in IT, then rewarded with multiple times of what they have invested, but still, they see IT as a least important aspect of their business. I can't wait to see when all companies kill of all their IT departments and buy IT services from IT Consulting firm. I'd say that it would cost multiple times more than having their own IT resources, and they'll get less control over what they want, and they'll have to live with what these consulting firm can offer them.

    Poor management of IT metro -- 24/01/06

    Very few (if any) senior 'C' level managers (and boards) understand how to manage, or allow others to manage their IT function.

    There is still too much emphasis on technical skills, even by senior managers, at the CIO level. The CIO is a difficult and strategic role, not a technical role.

    There is simply no understanding of the competitive advantage a properly tuned and aligned IT strategy with a co-operative, innovative, forward thinking and accommodating CIO can deliver.

    When hiring a CIO, concentrate less on their technical skills, look more at their education, the innovation, process change, and sustainable competitive advantage they can demonstrate.

    Unfortunately, IT is still seen as a cost centre with staff and budgets to cut.

    IT is a cost centre Robert Mettam -- 25/01/06 (in reply to #120127845)

    Of course the bean-counters see IT as a cost centre. They look at marketing and say "This contributes directly to Slaes", then they look at sales and say "This brings in revenue", then they look at IT and after-sales and say "These bring in no revenue but cost us", so they recommend that both IT and after-sales service be cut.
    The remedy could possibly be a better emphasis and education on risk analysis, at the Board level.

    I agree tony -- 15/02/06 (in reply to #120127845)

    I agree - in my experience many IT Support people not only have poor customer skills, but have very limited grasp of the role of IT to support the business and couldn't make out a business case for IT, if their arse was on fire. A CIO needs to be able to be articulate about exactly how IT contributes to the business and also be able to justify expenses - which inevitably means adopting some sort of 'best practice' or quality control methodology like ITIL for example.

    Boyles - Pre-Packaged Software I think not!! Paul Simmons -- 24/01/06

    An interesting article, as a Business IT professional myself I agree with the general comments in the article except for the "pre-packaged" software comments.

    I do however find it a little ironic that Mr Boyles himself is willing to state that most software used in major projects is pre-packaged! He of all people knows that any pre-packaged software used in major IT projects is highly customised to suit the organisation and it's business processes. Most problems are around implementation also.

    It seems Mr. Boyles has forgotten about November 2002, well many of us have not! People in the banking industry will probably know what I'm talking about and that was not a vanilla "pre-packaged" product, but highly customised under his leadership and governance.
    I would also advise readers to do a search of the archives on here and look for an article on a project under his direction and governance (same employer) which was a partnership with Microsoft for ATM and Eftpos solutions... again project was scrapped due to under performing highly customised software.

    A few months later Mr. Boyles sits on the board of Microsoft...

    Get you facts right Anonymous -- 01/02/06 (in reply to #120127846)

    Boyles does not sit on any MSFT board

    ICT cost reduction requested by board Jim Reilly -- 04/02/06

    It seems very strange after 50 years to hear your commnentator making the same remarks I heard in 1956 and just about every year since then. "Why do we not have ICT representation on our boards?"

    In 1956 it was why do we not have EDP knowledge/representation in our senior management team?

    I suppose one of the reasons may be that the people that are good at this profession tend not to be political in their make up and get their satisfaction from problem solving rather than hands off occupations. Hence they never make their way to the top of the pile.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured