Australian ISPs face prosecution over Net gambling

Australian Internet Service Providers face prosecution if they do not protect their subscribers from illegal gambling content on the Internet.

In a move designed to take the onus for blocking content away from the ISP, the Internet Industry Association has released a draft Interactive Gambling Code of Practice that calls on them to provide content filters.

Association chief executive Peter Coroneos says that the code is intended to shield association members from prosecution under the new Interactive Gambling Act and stop them from being forced to block content hosted offshore.

Under the draft code Internet Service Provider must provide each subscriber with a scheduled filter to block illegal gaming content.

They will be able to charge for the filter.

In the case of individual subscribers the ISP will have the option of providing the filter through an online or disk based registration process, but in the case of commercial subscribers, ISPs will have meet the user's network requirements by providing the appropriate software and/or facilitating access to firewall consultancy services.

However, the ISP will not be required to supply them to individuals, businesses or schools that indicate they already have one of the scheduled filters or some other means of restricting access to prohibited gambling content.

By providing the filters the code places the onus on the subscriber to filter what they access from the Internet, however, ISP's who fail to comply with the code can be forced to comply by the Australian Broadcasting Authority and may be prosecuted under the Interactive Gambling Act.

The code lists 15 approved filters and filter services that will be available to ISPs. However, more may be added later.

The IIA has called for comments on the draft code before filing it with the Australian Broadcasting Authority for formal registration. Members will have until November 15 to make submissions on the proposed code.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    How bloody rediculous is this. ...Anonymous -- 17/10/01

    How bloody rediculous is this... Does Telstra (or any comms company) face prosecution for providing the means of communication one can use to make an obscene phonecall? Does a car company face prosecution if someone uses one of their cars in a drive by shooting??? No... but our wonderfully (woefully???) informed government is placing yet another weight around the already struggling internet community. Get a Grip pollies!!! Just because you are scared of the true freedom of information the internet represents does not give you the right to take that freedom away from us... if you don't like gambling, or porn, or anything else on the net then don't go to the sites that host it. If you really want to do something useful then make spam illegal and give us subscribers the rights and the laws to sue spammers!!!

    Orwell's 1984 is another step ...Keith Styles -- 17/10/01

    Orwell's 1984 is another step closer. This government acts like a third world dictatorship towards the Internet user. If it doesn't like the freedom provided by the Internet, it OUTLAWS our access or snoops on our privacy.
    Where are the laws which give us the power to stop spamming or junk mail?

    Just who are we trying to fool ...Anonymous -- 17/01/02

    Just who are we trying to fool here? PRIVACY is PRIVACY! If I want to gamble, send emails expressing my views on any damned subject I please or look at scantily-clad people doing what comes naturally, all from the comfort of my own home, then I will.

    While the government is at it, if they're at all serious about what they're doing, they should be closing brick and mortar casinos and banning all forms of gambling and gambling advertisements (I'd like to see the economic figures on that one), removing porn magazines from the newsagency shelves (let's face it, those plastic covers are a joke) and hey...what the heck...just SHUT DOWN THE INTERNET! Close down television - there is more readily accessible violence, nudity, offensive language and questionable morality/ethicity on television than you can hope to find in a single day anywhere else. Personally, I can't wait for the day when I can program my own viewing. But I digress...if the government doesn't want me to gamble, then stop bombarding me with Powerball, Tattslotto, Ozlotto, Crown Casino (need I go on?) advertising everywhere I go. In fact, just shut the lot down. Then you can close the bowling alleys, then the cinemas. After that, we can look at ways of darkening windows and legislating against being seen outside without an ID tag.

    Wake up, not everyone is a paedophile, or rapist, or compulsive gambler for Pete's sake.

    It appears obvious to me that ...Anonymous -- 22/01/03

    It appears obvious to me that the reason both Australia and the USA are trying to ban online gambling is because there is nothing in it for them.

    US legislators make it clear that they see online gambling as a threat to revenue taxed from land-based casinos and, of course, land-based casinos (apart from the ones that have gone online from foreign shores) support online-gambling-ban-legislation presumably on the premise that there is only so much money to go around.

    I was shocked to learn recently that the American Indians, who run a large number of the land-based gambling resources in the US, only receive a percentage of net gain in the teens - the bulk is taxed by companies and cities who supported them in the initial establishment of these facilities.

    If you're desperate to recover from extreme poverty you'll accept any offer to establish a means of income.

    As an expatriate Aussie living in the US and webmaster for a casino portal online, I think it's obvious that if there was a way to tax online gambling facilities almost to extinction, then both countries would come out in support.

    Problem gamblers and teen exposure are minimal in comparison to total numbers of people who play and appear to be the hook upon which governments are hanging their hats.

    Nina

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured