The issue highlights the potential legal minefield faced by companies which opt to build Web sites using prefabricated templates obtained via the Internet rather than start from scratch.
Media Web chief executive officer, Luke Connell, claimed to have obtained the Web site's template from a US-based company called Free Web Templates, and that any correlation between the design of the Media Web Web site and that used by Hankook Logitech was purely coincidental.
The allegation were posted by participants in the broadband community forum hosted by Whirlpool.
"When I found out about the match I went and looked through the Korean Web site carefully," said Connell. "There's no cross over between the content, and I put my own design on the buttons on the top of the page."
Despite not having obtained legal advice Connell was adamant that he had in no way infringed copyright, and had obtained the template in good faith.
"I have only just launched the business, and I intend to put all the initial capital back into the company, not into building Web sites," Connell said.
Connell went on to say he intended to change the company Web site as soon as possible, so as to avert potential conflict.
Matthew Hall, partner in the IT and intellectual property group for legal firm Phillips Fox warned against downloading such Web site templates, without entering into a contractual arrangement with the template provider.
"It is important for the company obtaining the Web site to download to obtain the terms and conditions for the sites use which clearly state that the design can be used freely, together with an indemnity from being sued should another company claim rights to the design," Hall said.
Nonetheless Hall pointed out that it would be difficult for a South Korean company to have copyright on its work recognised in Australia, as the Asian country does not subscribe to the Berne Convention, which outlines international legal framework for the protection of copyright.
"At the end of the day, the Korean company would have to prove that their work had been copied and their copyright infringed, and then have the ruling recognised in Australia, which would be very unlikely," Hall said. "They would have to prove that the Australian company had copied the Web site directly from them, rather than obtained it from the US site, which would be very hard to do."
Mediaweb should just leave their site as it is. They look nothing like one another, and the other site can go jump in the lake.
And as for claiming copyright over a public web template?... I've never heard such a load of crap in my whole life. Public means just that - many people can use it.
Does that mean that I can go and charge people an entrance fee into the public toilets in our city?