Auditor-general slams AU University's software project

By Patrick Gray
03 March 2003 05:00 PM
Tags: ams, rmit, university, gray, patrick, academic, project, governance
The Victorian Auditor-General's Office has slammed RMIT University's management over their bungled Academic Management System (AMS) IT project, identifying "fundamental failures" in project management structures.

The AMS, which "went live" in October 2001, was supposed to streamline processes by consolidating all of RMIT's student management activities, but instead cost the university more than AU$47 million, a figure equal to 3.7 times the original budget, according to the report.

The problems arose from poor project management and governance, documentation failures, and the need to modify the key proprietary component of the PeopleSoft system selected for the AMS.

Individual issues in the report read like an administrative nightmare. RMIT's general ledger had to be updated manually using "...estimated revenue figures because reliable actual data was not available", and quite often RMIT staff had to revert to manual processes just to get the job done.

As of June 2002 tuition calculations were not performed for 5,000 students. The system was so problematic that RMIT International, the subsidiary responsible for managing international students, actually reverted back to the old system shortly after the implementation of the AMS.

The auditors' report, which was released on Friday, blames the project problems on poor communication, ineffective change management, and the lack of "a clearly defined governance structure".

The report outlines a documentation meltdown, and says the AMS project culture was "viewed as one of blame" internally.

"In undertaking the audits, we had to place significant reliance on the representations made by key project personnel, due to the absence of key documentation on processes and governance arrangements," it said.

Furthermore, the report says, the lack of documentation demonstrates an inadequate project governance, a lack of a "structured approach or suitable project methodology", as well as referring to "a lack of essential rigour [and] a lack of effective risk management".

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured